|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Luner-Landings - What do you think. [message #213415 is a reply to message #210333] |
Tue, 15 August 2006 14:51   |
 |
warranto
Messages: 2584
Registered: February 2003
Location: Alberta, Canada
Karma: 0
|
General (2 Stars) |
|
|
http://www.space.com/news/060813_apollo11_tapes.html
| Quote: |
“That’s the furthest thing from the truth,” Wood told SPACE.com. “There are no lost Apollo video tapes,” he emphasized.
[...]
Wood said he doubts the tapes have been trashed. On the other hand, there’s a 50/50 chance they were recycled.
“Since telemetry recording tapes back then cost $90 to $100 a reel … well, that was back when $100 dollars was $100 dollars,” Wood said. A magnetic rehab center at Goddard, he said, may have wiped the tapes clean—a budget-saving measure for reuse of the recording tapes.
“What we’re hoping, though, is that somebody, maybe, might have saved some of them,” Wood added. “We want to interest people to see something better than it happened at the time.”
|
[Updated on: Tue, 15 August 2006 14:51] Report message to a moderator |
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Luner-Landings - What do you think. [message #214443 is a reply to message #210333] |
Mon, 21 August 2006 23:35 |
 |
sterps
Messages: 223
Registered: October 2003
Location: Victoria, Australia
Karma: 0
|
Recruit |
|
|
I used to think the moon landing was a hoax. But i dont now, especially after studying astronomy at university. You must realise, man has visted the moon more than once. Even if the moon landing was staged, they would had been there by now, especially with the technology they have today.
| Quote: |
NO, we are protected from radiation by the earth magnetic field.
spacewalkers are protected by that.
The ozone layer does not protect us from radiation, it protects us from ultraviolet rays? i am not certain.
anyway a contry didn't know about the hoax and though it was posiible, so on their spacecraft the put a 6 feet lead sheet around it. to protect it from radiation, well you could imagine what happend on take off.
|
The magnetic field of the earth does protect earth from radiation from the sun, BUT, the atmosphere does also block most Ultra Violet rays from reaching the surface. This happens at the ozone layer in the stratosphere.
[Updated on: Mon, 21 August 2006 23:40] Report message to a moderator |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Luner-Landings - What do you think. [message #214484 is a reply to message #210333] |
Tue, 22 August 2006 09:37 |
 |
jnz
Messages: 3396
Registered: July 2006
Location: 30th century
Karma: 0
|
General (3 Stars) |
|
|
i just thought something and want somebady to disprove it, there is alot of quortz(spelling  ) in the big splash this quortz would have turned into "shocked" quortz.
why didn't it pick up any shocked quortz?
oh and that site had an error:(i am not to sure on this)
| Quote: |
Moon formed from the debris flung into space after a collision between early Earth and a Mars-size planet.
|
this was not a planet, i didn't orbit the sun?
[Updated on: Tue, 22 August 2006 09:40] Report message to a moderator |
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Luner-Landings - What do you think. [message #215286 is a reply to message #210333] |
Sat, 26 August 2006 04:31 |
 |
Sniper_De7
Messages: 866
Registered: April 2004
Location: Wisconsin
Karma: 0
|
Colonel |
|
|
Why would we need to send another man on the moon? If we really really wanted to go on the moon and/or needed to, robots would probably be used. Why would we risk sending men when we've already done it before? or why would we waste money to prove conspiracy nutjobs wrong.
Oderint, dum metuant.
It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles, or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood; who strives valiantly; who errs, who comes short again and again, because there is no effort without error and shortcoming; but who does actually strive to do the deeds; who knows great enthusiasms, the great devotions; who spends himself in a worthy cause; who at the best knows in the end the triumph of high achievement, and who at the worst, if he fails, at least fails while daring greatly, so that his place shall never be with those cold and timid souls who neither know victory nor defeat. - Theodore "Teddy" Roosevelt
|
|
|
|
| Re: Luner-Landings - What do you think. [message #215334 is a reply to message #210333] |
Sat, 26 August 2006 11:17 |
 |
Crimson
Messages: 7429
Registered: February 2003
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Karma: 0
|
General (5 Stars)
ADMINISTRATOR |
|
|
If we faked it and it was so obvious that we faked it, the Soviets would have blown the whistle on the whole thing. Just because there's a motive to fake it doesn't mean it was, in fact, faked. We really DID figure it out.
I'm the bawss.
|
|
|
|
Search
Help
Members
Register
Login
Home
