Home » General Discussions » Spam Fest » jarhead
| Re: jarhead [message #454857 is a reply to message #454757] |
Fri, 16 September 2011 22:12   |
 |
liquidv2
Messages: 3407 Registered: February 2007
Karma:
|
General (3 Stars) |
|
|
| Azazel wrote on Fri, 16 September 2011 03:12 | Therefore, you haven't had a first hand experiance with him, thus you can't make an accurate judgement.
|
i trust many of the people i've heard from about him
i don't trust you, and the fact that crimson does says a lot about her as a person
| Azazel wrote on Fri, 16 September 2011 03:12 | He wouldn't want to moderate/admin anywhere else for one reason alone, loyalty.
|
that one reason is no one else would put up with his shit
| Azazel wrote on Fri, 16 September 2011 03:12 | He certainly knows how to do his job properly and he'd be a great asset to any community.
|
i don't understand how you created this sentence with a throat full of dick
| Azazel wrote on Fri, 16 September 2011 03:12 | I'm certainly not arsekissing, because that's something I wont do. I'm simply speaking my mind, everyone's allowed to have their own opinion after all.
|
in my opinion you're a hypocritical piece of shit, and the fact that you of all people are the only one standing up for him doesn't help his case
if anything it hurts it
| Azazel wrote on Fri, 16 September 2011 03:12 | Mudkips: Maybe if you didn't act like a troll so much, he wouldn't have been so hostile towards you? (If he was, anyways).
|
maybe if jarhead wasn't a shitty admin people wouldn't have so many issues with him
| Azazel wrote on Fri, 16 September 2011 03:12 | For players/users that haven't actually had a problem with Jarhead here's my advice to you: Don't believe everything you read about him, because most of it probably isn't even true. So unless you have actually had a "first hand experiance" with him, then it's pointless in saying "I've heard this" and "People have said that". Go experiance what he's really like for yourselves and I bet you'll be suprised.
|
for players/users that take anything you say seriously there isn't much hope
your word isn't any more credible than MUDKIPS's word based on your own statement
Jarhead is a heaping pile of shit, and you're the lone fly circling it
anyone reading this topic can identify that immediately
|
|
|
|
 |
|
jarhead
By: MUDKIPS on Tue, 13 September 2011 09:05
|
 |
|
Re: jarhead
By: ChewML on Tue, 13 September 2011 09:48
|
 |
|
Re: jarhead
By: R315r4z0r on Tue, 13 September 2011 12:59
|
 |
|
Re: jarhead
By: ChewML on Tue, 13 September 2011 13:34
|
 |
|
Re: jarhead
By: MUDKIPS on Tue, 13 September 2011 15:02
|
 |
|
Re: jarhead
By: Sean on Thu, 15 September 2011 08:58
|
 |
|
Re: jarhead
By: MUDKIPS on Thu, 15 September 2011 13:07
|
 |
|
Re: jarhead
|
 |
|
Re: jarhead
By: kadoosh on Tue, 13 September 2011 15:13
|
 |
|
Re: jarhead
By: TankClash on Wed, 14 September 2011 15:08
|
 |
|
Re: jarhead
By: Spoony on Tue, 13 September 2011 15:20
|
 |
|
Re: jarhead
By: Gohax on Tue, 13 September 2011 20:56
|
 |
|
Re: jarhead
By: R315r4z0r on Tue, 13 September 2011 18:46
|
 |
|
Re: jarhead
By: Spoony on Wed, 14 September 2011 01:55
|
 |
|
Re: jarhead
By: Gohax on Thu, 15 September 2011 08:07
|
 |
|
Re: jarhead
By: MUDKIPS on Wed, 14 September 2011 13:27
|
 |
|
Re: jarhead
By: grant89uk on Thu, 15 September 2011 10:35
|
 |
|
Re: jarhead
By: slosha on Thu, 15 September 2011 11:30
|
 |
|
Re: jarhead
By: liquidv2 on Thu, 15 September 2011 15:35
|
 |
|
Re: jarhead
By: Sean on Fri, 16 September 2011 01:12
|
 |
|
Re: jarhead
By: MUDKIPS on Fri, 16 September 2011 03:28
|
 |
|
Re: jarhead
By: Spoony on Fri, 16 September 2011 08:17
|
 |
|
Re: jarhead
By: R315r4z0r on Fri, 16 September 2011 07:51
|
 |
|
Re: jarhead
By: Sean on Fri, 16 September 2011 11:25
|
 |
|
Re: jarhead
By: MUDKIPS on Fri, 16 September 2011 12:36
|
 |
|
Re: jarhead
By: ChewML on Fri, 16 September 2011 13:26
|
 |
|
Re: jarhead
By: R315r4z0r on Fri, 16 September 2011 18:41
|
 |
|
Re: jarhead
By: Prulez on Fri, 16 September 2011 08:53
|
 |
|
Re: jarhead
By: ehhh on Fri, 16 September 2011 09:06
|
 |
|
Re: jarhead
By: Prulez on Fri, 16 September 2011 11:38
|
 |
|
Re: jarhead
By: liquidv2 on Fri, 16 September 2011 22:12
|
 |
|
Re: jarhead
By: Crimson on Sat, 17 September 2011 18:01
|
 |
|
Re: jarhead
By: ChewML on Thu, 15 September 2011 18:29
|
 |
|
Re: jarhead
By: ChewML on Fri, 16 September 2011 09:59
|
 |
|
Re: jarhead
By: Crimson on Fri, 16 September 2011 15:57
|
 |
|
Re: jarhead
By: MUDKIPS on Sat, 17 September 2011 00:56
|
 |
|
Re: jarhead
By: Sean on Sat, 17 September 2011 09:27
|
 |
|
Re: jarhead
By: Prulez on Sat, 17 September 2011 10:01
|
 |
|
Re: jarhead
By: MUDKIPS on Sat, 17 September 2011 10:51
|
 |
|
Re: jarhead
By: Sean on Sat, 17 September 2011 10:59
|
 |
|
Re: jarhead
By: MUDKIPS on Sat, 17 September 2011 12:31
|
 |
|
Re: jarhead
By: Crimson on Sat, 17 September 2011 18:10
|
 |
|
Re: jarhead
|
 |
|
Re: jarhead
By: Starbuzz on Sat, 17 September 2011 12:32
|
 |
|
Re: jarhead
By: Prulez on Sat, 17 September 2011 14:00
|
 |
|
Re: jarhead
By: liquidv2 on Sat, 17 September 2011 17:52
|
 |
|
Re: jarhead
By: ChewML on Sat, 17 September 2011 14:30
|
 |
|
Re: jarhead
By: MUDKIPS on Sat, 17 September 2011 16:41
|
 |
|
Re: jarhead
By: ChewML on Sat, 17 September 2011 18:04
|
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Sat Dec 06 12:44:25 MST 2025
Total time taken to generate the page: 0.01506 seconds
|