Renegade Public Forums
C&C: Renegade --> Dying since 2003™, resurrected in 2024!
Home » General Discussions » Heated Discussions and Debates » FOX News ...
FOX News ... [message #109699] Mon, 23 August 2004 15:01 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
SuperFlyingEngi is currently offline  SuperFlyingEngi
Messages: 1756
Registered: November 2003
Karma:
General (1 Star)
cowmisfit

Fox news DOES tell the truth, it shows both sides of the story, fair and balanced, wheter you think it is or not , it most deffinitly is. Infact, the owner of Fox News is backing KERRY I rember seeing a few weeks ago.


Rupert Murdoch backing Kerry? That's something I don't see happening. If you're going to say something like that, show an actual article or at least something. FOX News is such a lie. They feed fools like you false opinions all day long. Like how they pretend that there is an actual debate surrounding the Swift Boat ads, when in fact it's all a bunch of crap, and how they pretend that the Swift Boat ads and the Move On ads are two heads of the same coin.

atrios.blogspot.com

Why are the Swift Boat Liar ads and Move On's ads equivalent? On one hand we have proven liars contradicting existing Navy records and 35 years of public comment, and on the other hand we have legitimate questions, raised by many prominent news organizations, about whether George Bush bothered to show up for national guard service as he was required. There are many legitimate questions about Bush's failure to fulfill his duty, including his failure to take a required flight physical, as well as the fact that Bush lied about his military record in his autobiography. Kerry has Navy records to back up his claims, Bush does not.


"To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public." -- Theodore Roosevelt (1918)

"The danger to political dissent is acute where the Government attempts to act under so vague a concept as the power to protect "domestic security." Given the difficulty of defining the domestic security interest, the danger of abuse in acting to protect that interest becomes apparent. --U.S. Supreme Court decision (407 U.S. 297 (1972)

The Liberal Media At Work
An objective look at media partisanship
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: Stop using Nader to win against the Democrats.
Next Topic: For Crimservative...
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Tue Jun 18 16:26:42 MST 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.01139 seconds