Renegade Public Forums
C&C: Renegade --> Dying since 2003™, resurrected in 2024!
Home » General Discussions » Heated Discussions and Debates » erikboxem
Re: erikboxem [message #272161 is a reply to message #272159] Tue, 10 July 2007 04:45 Go to previous messageGo to next message
_SSnipe_ is currently offline  _SSnipe_
Messages: 4121
Registered: May 2007
Location: Riverside Southern Califo...
Karma: 0
General (4 Stars)
0x90 wrote on Tue, 10 July 2007 12:40

Ghostshaw wrote on Tue, 10 July 2007 13:31

Sadukar is right, the latest *cheat name removed*doesn't work without a renegade restart, so he would eitehr have had to have let and rejoined or he was running it all along.



to be even more specific: it has to be loaded with renegade (right from the start) for a long time now (since 1.3, that was dec 2006 i guess).
which means you have to load renegade with the cheat right from the beginning (or even more: the cheat _before_ renegade) and it will last until you exit renegade completely.
so its absolutely impossible that he turned it on "to search the cheater" just for 10 seconds and turned it off again without exiting renegade (and thus at least leaving the game).

imo you caught a cheater there and hes now trying to save his ass.

unfortunately i didnt implement any backdoor or w/e, else i could tell you if he cheated or not Razz

regards
0x90




didnt u make that cheat i heard?
Re: erikboxem [message #272163 is a reply to message #272082] Tue, 10 July 2007 04:50 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Herr Surth is currently offline  Herr Surth
Messages: 1684
Registered: July 2007
Karma: 0
General (1 Star)
Quote:

understandable? yes a bit.
No, it isnt. Cheating is not in any way allowed. excuses like "but so many do it" or "i use it to find other cheaters" are pathetic.


Quote:


Banning Erikboxem is out off the question
Might I ask why?
Re: erikboxem [message #272164 is a reply to message #272082] Tue, 10 July 2007 04:52 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Goztow is currently offline  Goztow
Messages: 9730
Registered: March 2005
Location: Belgium
Karma: 13
General (5 Stars)
Goztoe
He's probably the one paying the bills.

You can find me in The KOSs2 (TK2) discord while I'm playing. Feel free to come and say hi! TK2 discord
Re: erikboxem [message #272166 is a reply to message #272082] Tue, 10 July 2007 04:57 Go to previous messageGo to next message
jnz is currently offline  jnz
Messages: 3396
Registered: July 2006
Location: 30th century
Karma: 0
General (3 Stars)
Why would he need to cheat? Just stand still and die, then you pwnt the cheater. His excuse was stupid and i don't belive it one bit.
Re: erikboxem [message #272167 is a reply to message #272082] Tue, 10 July 2007 05:06 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Hex is currently offline  Hex
Messages: 858
Registered: March 2004
Karma: 0
Colonel
hes the server owner

goztow wrote on Tue, 11 May 2010 08:00

If we had to ban all who ever cheated or ever created a cheat (obj3cts and such) then I don't think there would be many members left here (sad fact).


reborn wrote on Fri, 29 January 2010 23:37

std is for pro's. Razz
Re: erikboxem [message #272170 is a reply to message #272082] Tue, 10 July 2007 05:14 Go to previous messageGo to next message
MexPirate is currently offline  MexPirate
Messages: 883
Registered: March 2006
Location: UK
Karma: 0
Colonel
I don't think you can really get any more owned than that - even ox90 is turning around and pointing out the obvious flaws in your retarded story.

This post should be merged with the other on the same subject - the other post also has this guys IP for any server owners that want to ban him.


http://i41.photobucket.com/albums/e255/Cloudx16/Newer%20Stuff/03f9b76a.png
It's a mexican pirate .... F*ck a dog by Blink 182
Re: erikboxem [message #272171 is a reply to message #272167] Tue, 10 July 2007 05:17 Go to previous messageGo to next message
EvilWhiteDragon is currently offline  EvilWhiteDragon
Messages: 3751
Registered: October 2005
Location: The Netherlands
Karma: 0
General (3 Stars)

Well, if you have any morals, and selfdignity, you would leave as soon as you would figure out the one paying the bills is a cheater.
Either ban him or leave him, pretty simple. Noone needs cheating serverowners. Specially not hte ont htat are cheating in a community war are pretty hopeless.

Btw, if he only used it to specate a suspected cheater, why does he have a screenshot with himself on it? I mean, if you think up excuses, then please, at least make them look believable.


http://www.blackintel.org/usr/evilwhitedragon/pointfix.gif
BlackIntel admin/founder/PR dude (not a coder)
Please visit http://www.blackintel.org/

V, V for Vendetta

People should not be afraid of their governments.
Governments should be afraid of their people.
Re: erikboxem [message #272172 is a reply to message #272082] Tue, 10 July 2007 05:19 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Sir Kane
Messages: 1701
Registered: March 2003
Location: Angerville
Karma: 0
General (1 Star)
That's ALMOST as awesome as that:
http://jelly-server.com/nuke/modules.php?name=FUDForums&file=index&t=msg &S=f39a0bff8be6d860ea0d517458d3d9ef&th=4212&goto=44152#msg_44155


Proud N9500 and proud N6270 user. Creator of the IEE libraries (original bhs.dll) and the RB series software.
http://n00bstories.com/image.fetch.php?id=1189992501http://www.n00bstories.com/image.fetch.php?id=1257492907
Re: erikboxem [message #272174 is a reply to message #272082] Tue, 10 July 2007 05:28 Go to previous messageGo to next message
IR4p3dy0u is currently offline  IR4p3dy0u
Messages: 121
Registered: March 2007
Karma: 0
Recruit
Actually if the person is using RG while running RGH, there are a couple ways to test for *cheat name removed*:)
Re: erikboxem [message #272175 is a reply to message #272082] Tue, 10 July 2007 05:39 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Geert42 is currently offline  Geert42
Messages: 11
Registered: July 2007
Karma: 0
Recruit
You can all write and think about this case what you want.

OK he had *cheat name removed*1.33 on,
i explained to you why,

I did not say he had a cheat attached to it,
and yes he is paying the dedicated-server.

Again i (and Duke-Gaming)stand fully with Erikboxem and i know he would not use *cheat name removed*to cheat.
Why is that so hard to believe?

@the maker off rgh,
i only admire you for the knowledge of writing this cheat,
for the rest you only wrote it to screw up a nice game.

This will be my last post inhere,
i have nothing more to say.

Well maybe can someone find out who shot Erikboxem 2 times inside the ref., without killing him.
That's the real cheater not Erikboxem.
I know there were a lot of QoQ..... guy's ingame,
(not implying that it was 1 of them) Big Grin
Re: erikboxem [message #272176 is a reply to message #272082] Tue, 10 July 2007 05:43 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Herr Surth is currently offline  Herr Surth
Messages: 1684
Registered: July 2007
Karma: 0
General (1 Star)
Quote:

Why is that so hard to believe?
If you cant answer that question, im sorry for you Big Grin
Re: erikboxem [message #272177 is a reply to message #272175] Tue, 10 July 2007 05:47 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Goztow is currently offline  Goztow
Messages: 9730
Registered: March 2005
Location: Belgium
Karma: 13
General (5 Stars)
Goztoe
Geert42 wrote on Tue, 10 July 2007 14:39

You can all write and think about this case what you want.

OK he had *cheat name removed*1.33 on,
i explained to you why,

I did not say he had a cheat attached to it,

--> *cough* is a cheat: it includes aimbot, shows you where enemies are through walls (including stealth enemies!) and allows things like PT hack. You can also load object-cheats with it but most people find that unnecessary. You fail.

and yes he is paying the dedicated-server.

--> obvious... you fail twice

Again i (and Duke-Gaming)stand fully with Erikboxem and i know he would not use *cheat name removed*to cheat.
Why is that so hard to believe?

--> translation: "he pays for the bills and I get power on that server, you don't expect me t walk away?" you fail three times

@the maker off rgh,
i only admire you for the knowledge of writing this cheat,
for the rest you only wrote it to screw up a nice game.

This will be my last post inhere,
i have nothing more to say.

--> Do,n't go away, run away!

Well maybe can someone find out who shot Erikboxem 2 times inside the ref., without killing him.
That's the real cheater not Erikboxem.
I know there were a lot of QoQ..... guy's ingame,
(not implying that it was 1 of them) Big Grin

Red answers


You can find me in The KOSs2 (TK2) discord while I'm playing. Feel free to come and say hi! TK2 discord
Re: erikboxem [message #272179 is a reply to message #272082] Tue, 10 July 2007 05:50 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Hex is currently offline  Hex
Messages: 858
Registered: March 2004
Karma: 0
Colonel
I can list at least 3 DG mods/admin that do not support his actions

goztow wrote on Tue, 11 May 2010 08:00

If we had to ban all who ever cheated or ever created a cheat (obj3cts and such) then I don't think there would be many members left here (sad fact).


reborn wrote on Fri, 29 January 2010 23:37

std is for pro's. Razz

[Updated on: Tue, 10 July 2007 05:59]

Report message to a moderator

Re: erikboxem [message #272183 is a reply to message #272082] Tue, 10 July 2007 05:58 Go to previous messageGo to next message
IR4p3dy0u is currently offline  IR4p3dy0u
Messages: 121
Registered: March 2007
Karma: 0
Recruit
 did not say he had a cheat attached to it,
and yes he is paying the dedicated-server.


RGH itself is a cheat you moron.

Community game with QoQ in it, pretty sad a community would use them in a game, Ive busted them in fnall server several diffrent times cheating, but still always managed to hand thier asses to them.

Either way your guy got busted cheating, hes no diffrent then that matix guy that got busted cheating in his own server. GUILTY!!!
Re: erikboxem [message #272184 is a reply to message #272082] Tue, 10 July 2007 05:59 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Herr Surth is currently offline  Herr Surth
Messages: 1684
Registered: July 2007
Karma: 0
General (1 Star)
Quote:

I can list at least 3 DG mods/admin that do not support his actions

when they still are DG Mods/Admins they DO support him, at least in my opinion

[Updated on: Tue, 10 July 2007 05:59]

Report message to a moderator

Re: erikboxem [message #272190 is a reply to message #272082] Tue, 10 July 2007 06:35 Go to previous messageGo to next message
DutchNeon is currently offline  DutchNeon
Messages: 533
Registered: January 2007
Location: The Netherlands
Karma: 0
Colonel
May i add 1 thing, we didnt said you guys won by erik, i mean, you guys had seriously teamplay which we almost didnt ( first a no leader, i think we would had more with Luna, buit you guys still probably won ) and the lag to some american guys ( the Usual stuff, you walk in tunnel, suddenly a 500er spawns in front of you, you try to kill him but no damage happens, and suddenly you are dead + Gameplay Pending ).

As my state in our forum, Using a cheat to catch cheaters is kinda strange, its like: using cheats against cheaters. As stated, hes a 'cheat hunter' , so he hunts with that cheat, meaning he uses this cheat all the time in your server?.

Also, if he didnt intended to use, we cant know, he could lie, or speak the truth, only erik himself knows. but running it from start ( as mentioned ) is needed, shows he intended to use, why load it up anyway then, if you not gonna use. Its like: Starting aimbot, im not sure if im gonna use it you think, but you start it, so it means you probably have a reason to start itL Using it.

The Name thing is an Advantage over other players, if he didnt used other options of the cheat, he still have an advantage over other players, cause they ( we ) cant see the names, but he could.

Im Not saying he 'owned himself' and that hes guilty, im only giving reasons why he probably used it for other stuff.

[Updated on: Tue, 10 July 2007 06:40]

Report message to a moderator

Re: erikboxem [message #272191 is a reply to message #272183] Tue, 10 July 2007 06:39 Go to previous messageGo to next message
QoQuake is currently offline  QoQuake
Messages: 4
Registered: July 2007
Karma: 0
Recruit
IR4p3dy0u wrote on Tue, 10 July 2007 07:58

 did not say he had a cheat attached to it,
and yes he is paying the dedicated-server.


RGH itself is a cheat you moron.

Community game with QoQ in it, pretty sad a community would use them in a game, Ive busted them in fnall server several diffrent times cheating, but still always managed to hand thier asses to them.

Either way your guy got busted cheating, hes no diffrent then that matix guy that got busted cheating in his own server. GUILTY!!!



well ok then
u pwn qoq?
proove it
i challange u to a sniper cw
u in? or u all mouth no action

[Updated on: Tue, 10 July 2007 06:40]

Report message to a moderator

Re: erikboxem [message #272193 is a reply to message #272082] Tue, 10 July 2007 06:51 Go to previous messageGo to next message
IR4p3dy0u is currently offline  IR4p3dy0u
Messages: 121
Registered: March 2007
Karma: 0
Recruit
Sure quake Ill play you a 1 vs 1 sniper match, then after that you can play me 1 vs 1 aow so you in?

Even though im pretty much stricly an AOW player, Ill bet I can hang with you sniping if not even beat you.

[Updated on: Tue, 10 July 2007 06:52]

Report message to a moderator

Re: erikboxem [message #272203 is a reply to message #272191] Tue, 10 July 2007 07:35 Go to previous messageGo to next message
sadukar09 is currently offline  sadukar09
Messages: 2812
Registered: May 2007
Location: Ottawa,Canada
Karma: 0
General (2 Stars)
QoQuake wrote on Tue, 10 July 2007 08:39

IR4p3dy0u wrote on Tue, 10 July 2007 07:58

 did not say he had a cheat attached to it,
and yes he is paying the dedicated-server.


RGH itself is a cheat you moron.

Community game with QoQ in it, pretty sad a community would use them in a game, Ive busted them in fnall server several diffrent times cheating, but still always managed to hand thier asses to them.

Either way your guy got busted cheating, hes no diffrent then that matix guy that got busted cheating in his own server. GUILTY!!!



well ok then
u pwn qoq?
proove it
i challange u to a sniper cw
u in? or u all mouth no action


Can you at least type like a intelligent person?


Quote:

[19:16:48] <APBBR> @ryan3k: THE ENFIELD DEFIES THE LAWS OF PHYSICS BECAUSE THE BULLETS INSTANTLY HIT THEIR TARGETS LOL
[19:16:52] <APBBR> @ryan3k: CHRONO TECHNOLOGY IN TEH BULLETS


Quote:

[22:48]<APBBR> @V0LK0V: AOL COMING UR WAI K
[22:48] <APBBR> Host: Quitting due to Westwood Online connection loss.

Re: erikboxem [message #272206 is a reply to message #272175] Tue, 10 July 2007 07:43 Go to previous messageGo to next message
lookitzhiep is currently offline  lookitzhiep
Messages: 12
Registered: May 2006
Karma: 0
Recruit
Geert42 wrote on Tue, 10 July 2007 07:39

You can all write and think about this case what you want.

OK he had *cheat name removed*1.33 on,
i explained to you why,

I did not say he had a cheat attached to it,
and yes he is paying the dedicated-server.

Again i (and Duke-Gaming)stand fully with Erikboxem and i know he would not use *cheat name removed*to cheat.
Why is that so hard to believe?

@the maker off rgh,
i only admire you for the knowledge of writing this cheat,
for the rest you only wrote it to screw up a nice game.

This will be my last post inhere,
i have nothing more to say.

Well maybe can someone find out who shot Erikboxem 2 times inside the ref., without killing him.
That's the real cheater not Erikboxem.
I know there were a lot of QoQ..... guy's ingame,
(not implying that it was 1 of them) Big Grin

Wow! Are you sure he wasn't near the backdoor and a sniper was on the top of the tunnels?? Are you sure it wasn't splash damage from a Mobile Artillery?? And besides, you're inside a building! Just refill and keep doing that until you get killed. Then you look at who killed you and question them. Nice....
Re: erikboxem [message #272209 is a reply to message #272082] Tue, 10 July 2007 07:52 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Stonekirby is currently offline  Stonekirby
Messages: 4
Registered: January 2007
Location: Luxembourg
Karma: 0
Recruit
I play this game now hm 5 years or more

I saw alot cheaters and pros, this made me very sad to read here that the owner of dg community is / was / or whatever the SS proofs that he was running it in a war. And what I say to this crap is: How can you be so f*cking stupid or ignorant to think that it's ok to run a cheat to find an other cheater omfg. Even if you are sure that a guy is cheating and you don't know who it is, this is never an option to take. You have to use anti cheat software and no cheats to find him cuz now you are not better than the cheater is, even if you didn't used the cheat to win the cw. Cuz I know you didn't used it to win cuz we lost all cw exept fnfalls (= gamerz0ne, latly somebody told me dunno if fnfalls = gamerz0ne huh ?!) well and everybody know that fnfalls are the biggest noobs in renegade history. But what is even more stupid is uploading the SS why did you even took that SS ?!. After losing CWs you just said some words like well we lost but we had alot fun thats what counts, thats your opinion and also mine, thats what proofs for me that you didn't used it to win. Erik you disapointed me like hell cuz I respected you very much but this is just stupid, Someone who has no complexs to run a cheat in a cw to find an other cheater has no complex to run a cheat for any other reasons.

And @ Quake and IR4p3dy0u: why the hate ? Get serious guys peace.
Re: erikboxem [message #272224 is a reply to message #272082] Tue, 10 July 2007 09:31 Go to previous messageGo to next message
DutchNeon is currently offline  DutchNeon
Messages: 533
Registered: January 2007
Location: The Netherlands
Karma: 0
Colonel
We Dont cheat, you guys do, who are the noobs then as stated in 'lack of skill' im not saying you cheat stone, but more ppl of duke got a 'cheat' history.
Re: erikboxem [message #272229 is a reply to message #272183] Tue, 10 July 2007 10:07 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Geert42 is currently offline  Geert42
Messages: 11
Registered: July 2007
Karma: 0
Recruit
IR4p3dy0u wrote on Tue, 10 July 2007 07:58


RGH itself is a cheat you moron.

Community game with QoQ in it, pretty sad a community would use them in a game, Ive busted them in fnall server several diffrent times cheating, but still always managed to hand thier asses to them.




I know what *cheat name removed*is you fool

the QoQ were playing for gamerzone,

and for the record:
@Hex i don't aprove to use *cheat name removed*in a clan-war to catch cheaters,
@spooney you promised us those log-files the log-files you sended were useless, only teamchat was on it i believe.
@Goztow i missed your comment on the last thing i wrote.

@the server-owners,
most off you know Erikboxem and you know how he hates cheaters,
ok he did a stupid thing, i know it and he knows it,
if you want to know more about it ask him, before you hang him.
That is all i want to ask you.

Thanks Geert42
Duke-Gaming administrator
Re: erikboxem [message #272231 is a reply to message #272229] Tue, 10 July 2007 10:20 Go to previous messageGo to next message
EvilWhiteDragon is currently offline  EvilWhiteDragon
Messages: 3751
Registered: October 2005
Location: The Netherlands
Karma: 0
General (3 Stars)

Geert42 wrote on Tue, 10 July 2007 19:07

IR4p3dy0u wrote on Tue, 10 July 2007 07:58


RGH itself is a cheat you moron.

Community game with QoQ in it, pretty sad a community would use them in a game, Ive busted them in fnall server several diffrent times cheating, but still always managed to hand thier asses to them.




I know what *cheat name removed*is you fool

the QoQ were playing for gamerzone,

and for the record:
@Hex i don't aprove to use *cheat name removed*in a clan-war to catch cheaters,
@spooney you promised us those log-files the log-files you sended were useless, only teamchat was on it i believe.
@Goztow i missed your comment on the last thing i wrote.

@the server-owners,
most off you know Erikboxem and you know how he hates cheaters,
ok he did a stupid thing, i know it and he knows it,
if you want to know more about it ask him, before you hang him.
That is all i want to ask you.

Thanks Geert42
Duke-Gaming administrator

well, why would I don't want to see a cheater hang?
Someone that loads up *caugh* before joining a community war is wrong in any way. No lame excuses.
The only VALID excuse would be that he told gamerz0ne beforehand, and them agreeing with that. (or at least some gamerz0ne admin)


http://www.blackintel.org/usr/evilwhitedragon/pointfix.gif
BlackIntel admin/founder/PR dude (not a coder)
Please visit http://www.blackintel.org/

V, V for Vendetta

People should not be afraid of their governments.
Governments should be afraid of their people.
Re: erikboxem [message #272235 is a reply to message #272179] Tue, 10 July 2007 10:48 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
ExEric3 is currently offline  ExEric3
Messages: 746
Registered: February 2005
Location: Slovakia
Karma: 0
Colonel
Hex wrote on Tue, 10 July 2007 14:50

I can list at least 3 DG mods/admin that do not support his actions


Can you put here this list? I am very interested about it.
Previous Topic: lol, "renejew"
Next Topic: Apple MacBook Vs. Dell Latitude D630
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Sun Jun 16 11:13:34 MST 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.01644 seconds