| 
		
			| Re: My Two Cents on Non00bs [message #206752 is a reply to message #206665] | Thu, 06 July 2006 01:45   |  
			| 
				
				|  |  JohnDoe Messages: 1416
 Registered: May 2006
 
	Karma: 0
 | General (1 Star) |  |  |  
	| | Crimson wrote on Wed, 05 July 2006 13:47 |  | But both teams CAN'T do it. Nod's beacons do far less damage than GDI's.
 
 | 
 
 You don't beacon to destroy the ref, you beacon to get points off it...if one side does a little more damage, then it's really not a big deal if you look at the bigger picture. I mean...after all Nod has it easier to take the tunnel because Sakura > Havoc.
 
 lol
 |  
	|  |  | 
	|  | 
	|  | 
	| 
		
			| Re: My Two Cents on Non00bs [message #206796 is a reply to message #206752] | Thu, 06 July 2006 10:39   |  
			| 
				
				|  |  Crimson Messages: 7431
 Registered: February 2003
 Location: Phoenix, AZ
 
	Karma: 0
 | General (5 Stars)ADMINISTRATOR
 |  |  |  
	| | JohnDoe wrote on Thu, 06 July 2006 01:45 |  | 
 | Crimson wrote on Wed, 05 July 2006 13:47 |  | But both teams CAN'T do it. Nod's beacons do far less damage than GDI's.
 
 | 
 
 You don't beacon to destroy the ref, you beacon to get points off it...if one side does a little more damage, then it's really not a big deal if you look at the bigger picture. I mean...after all Nod has it easier to take the tunnel because Sakura > Havoc.
 
 | 
 
 Far less damage = less points = unfair/unbalanced.
 
 Either way, I do not favor tactics that are both difficult/impossible to defend against and lacking in skill. How the heck can one team take control of the tunnels in such a short amount of time to disarm?
 
 I'm the bawss.
 |  
	|  |  | 
	|  | 
	|  | 
	| 
		
			| Re: My Two Cents on Non00bs [message #206811 is a reply to message #206797] | Thu, 06 July 2006 12:43   |  
			| 
				
				|  |  Spoony Messages: 3915
 Registered: January 2006
 
	Karma: 0
 | General (3 Stars)Tactics & Strategies Moderator
 |  |  |  
	| | z310 wrote on Thu, 06 July 2006 13:46 |  | 
 | JohnDoe wrote on Thu, 06 July 2006 04:45 |  | ...Sakura > Havoc.
 
 | 
 
 Could you please explain?
 
 | 
 havoc is an easier target than sakura
 
 
 | Crimson wrote |  | How the heck can one team take control of the tunnels in such a short amount of time to disarm?
 
 | 
 you take the tunnels before they nuke, and you have a couple of people hold them so they can't
 
 Unleash the Renerageâ„¢
 
 Renedrama [ren-i-drah-muh]
 - noun
 1. the inevitable criticism one receives after doing something awful
 |  
	|  |  | 
	| 
		
			| Re: My Two Cents on Non00bs [message #206813 is a reply to message #206796] | Thu, 06 July 2006 12:44  |  
			| 
				
				|  |  JohnDoe Messages: 1416
 Registered: May 2006
 
	Karma: 0
 | General (1 Star) |  |  |  
	| | Crimson wrote on Thu, 06 July 2006 12:39 |  | 
 | JohnDoe wrote on Thu, 06 July 2006 01:45 |  | 
 | Crimson wrote on Wed, 05 July 2006 13:47 |  | But both teams CAN'T do it. Nod's beacons do far less damage than GDI's.
 
 | 
 
 You don't beacon to destroy the ref, you beacon to get points off it...if one side does a little more damage, then it's really not a big deal if you look at the bigger picture. I mean...after all Nod has it easier to take the tunnel because Sakura > Havoc.
 
 | 
 
 Far less damage = less points = unfair/unbalanced.
 
 Either way, I do not favor tactics that are both difficult/impossible to defend against and lacking in skill. How the heck can one team take control of the tunnels in such a short amount of time to disarm?
 
 | 
 
 = less points for repairing...it all evens out.
 
 It's not like you're going to lose the ref because of it...being able to beacon there is an advantage you get from taking control of the tunnels just like pointwhoring buildings is an advantage you get from taking control of the field...makes sense to me.
 
 
 | Quote: |  | 
 Could you please explain?
 
 | 
 
 Hmm...could have something to do with Havoc being like twice Sakura's size.
 
 lol
 |  
	|  |  |