|  | 
	|  | 
	| 
		
			| Re: The Revolution controller [message #171664 is a reply to message #171662] | Fri, 16 September 2005 01:57   |  
			| 
				
				|  |  Scythar Messages: 580
 Registered: February 2003
 Location: Finland
 
	Karma: 0
 | Colonel |  |  |  
	| Why not? FPS games should be a lot easier now that you can actually aim with your hand instead of an analog stick. And since it has motion detector, you can use it as a sword, for example. Just swing your arm and cut them up. It can also be turned sideways to resemble   an old fashioned pad. You can attach special devices to it through the plug in the end too. 
 There's a hole in the sky through which things can fly.
 [Updated on: Fri, 16 September 2005 01:58] Report message to a moderator |  
	|  |  | 
	|  | 
	| 
		
			| Re: The Revolution controller [message #171668 is a reply to message #171662] | Fri, 16 September 2005 03:50   |  
			| 
				
				|  | Dr. Lithius Messages: 609
 Registered: March 2005
 
	Karma: 0
 | Colonel |  |  |  
	| Silly little Nintendo. . .  Always focusing on hardware, never truly paying attention to software. . .  All and all, though, I've gotta say that at first, my reaction to the controller was "What on Earth?!"  After a few moments and some light reading, however, I think I can see how playing a game with that would work.  I dare say I even dig the concept. 
 . . .holy crap, that's going to be a freaking blast.  Not even the PC has a game that combines a first-person shooter with a lightgun game.  Think of the possibilities!| Scythar wrote on Fri, 16 September 2005 01:57 |  | FPS games should be a lot easier now that you can actually aim with your hand instead of an analog stick.
 
 | 
 [Updated on: Fri, 16 September 2005 03:51] Report message to a moderator |  
	|  |  | 
	|  | 
	| 
		
			| Re: The Revolution controller [message #171678 is a reply to message #171662] | Fri, 16 September 2005 07:07   |  
			| 
				
				|  |  Oblivion165 Messages: 3468
 Registered: June 2003
 Location: Hendersonville, North Car...
 
	Karma: 0
 | General (3 Stars) |  |  |  
	| First thing i thought of was that jaguar system that used a controller. Biggest bomb in history. (if i remember correctly) 
 Watching the footage, it looks promising but you will need a huge tv, and lots of room between you and other players.
 
 "My eye!"
 
 Etc
 
 WOL: Ob165ion Skype: Oblivion165 Yahoo Instant Messenger: CaptainJohn165
 |  
	|  |  | 
	|  | 
	|  | 
	| 
		
			| Re: The Revolution controller [message #171695 is a reply to message #171662] | Fri, 16 September 2005 10:43   |  
			| 
				
				|  |  cheesesoda Messages: 6507
 Registered: March 2003
 Location: Jackson, Michigan
 
	Karma: 0
 | General (5 Stars) |  
 |  |  
	| I think the concept is ridiculous. I read this article earlier, and while I agree that it does have possibilities, I think it's a little too hasty to make this their official controller. They should just try and stick with what works, but maybe release it as an alternative controller. Yes, I do see some usefulness to it, I just see it as a flop. I mean, I have absolutely no desire to use a remote to play a game. I just see it too hard to adjust to, and plus, still to this day I miss certain numbers on my actual remote control, so I can see myself messing up even more often while playing a game with that controller. 
 whoa.
 |  
	|  |  | 
	| 
		
			| Re: The Revolution controller [message #171699 is a reply to message #171662] | Fri, 16 September 2005 11:15   |  
			|  |  
	| I think that games made for this "remote controller" will have some unique and different gameplay, but this controller design is no where close to being revolutionary. It's just a light gun shaped like a remote control that you can plug normal controller parts into. 
 Sony's Eyetoy for the PS2 is a more "revolutionary" way to interact with games then the Revolution's remote controller.
 
 This controller should be an alternative controller, while a normal controller is the primary for the games (so people can play the games normally, and if they want they could play them with the remote), or like the Eyetoy, only for certain games.
 
 .:Red Alert: A Path Beyond Modeler:.
 E-mail: sirphoenixx@gmail.com
 AIM: Sir Phoenixx
 ICQ: 339325768
 MSN: sirphoenixx@hotmail.com
 Yahoo: sirphoenix86
 If anyone needs any help with using 3dsmax, or gmax feel free to contact me.
 My Gallery: sir-phoenixx.deviantart.com/gallery
 |  
	|  |  | 
	|  | 
	| 
		
			| Re: The Revolution controller [message #171702 is a reply to message #171695] | Fri, 16 September 2005 12:00   |  
			| 
				
				|  |  Scythar Messages: 580
 Registered: February 2003
 Location: Finland
 
	Karma: 0
 | Colonel |  |  |  
	| | j_ball430 wrote on Fri, 16 September 2005 13:43 |  | I think the concept is ridiculous. I read this article earlier, and while I agree that it does have possibilities, I think it's a little too hasty to make this their official controller. They should just try and stick with what works, but maybe release it as an alternative controller. Yes, I do see some usefulness to it, I just see it as a flop. I mean, I have absolutely no desire to use a remote to play a game. I just see it too hard to adjust to, and plus, still to this day I miss certain numbers on my actual remote control, so I can see myself messing up even more often while playing a game with that controller.
 
 | 
 
 Sticking up with what works has never quite been Nintendos thing. Let's not forget that it was Nintendo that came up with joystick, d-pad, analog sticks, and wireless controllers first, others have just been following their footsteps. Most innovations in todays controllers are Nintendos original inventions.
 
 
 There's one thing I'm very curious about. If Nintendo comes up with nicely priced 3D-glasses, this controller might just bring that true 360° virtual reality we've allways been dreaming of a little closer. With this controller, the concept might finally work to some extend. Of course it would have to be modified, but what I'm trying to say is that if consumers adopt this mobility the controller brings (Using both arms and thus the whole upper body as the input device instead of your fingertips), the concept will be used a lot in the future....you just never know.
 
 
 There's a hole in the sky through which things can fly.
 [Updated on: Fri, 16 September 2005 12:05] Report message to a moderator |  
	|  |  | 
	|  | 
	| 
		
			| Re: The Revolution controller [message #171718 is a reply to message #171662] | Fri, 16 September 2005 14:38   |  
			| 
				
				|  | Dan Messages: 395
 Registered: August 2003
 Location: UK
 
	Karma: 0
 | Commander |  |  |  
	| Well it certainly is, well, interesting. Although it could take a bit of getting used to, it would certainly be different to what we have at the moment. I'd like to try out a game where you weild a sword, that should be fun. Looks like some require the joystick that you hold in the other hand. 
 Fear the Remote Control of Doom!
 |  
	|  |  | 
	|  | 
	|  | 
	| 
		
			| Re: The Revolution controller [message #171724 is a reply to message #171668] | Fri, 16 September 2005 15:35   |  
			| 
				
				|  |  cmatt42 Messages: 2057
 Registered: July 2004
 
	Karma: 0
 | General (2 Stars) |  |  |  
	| | Joseph Collins wrote on Fri, 16 September 2005 05:50 |  | All and all, though, I've gotta say that at first, my reaction to the controller was "What on Earth?!"  After a few moments and some light reading, however, I think I can see how playing a game with that would work.  I dare say I even dig the concept.
 
 | 
 
 I had similar reactions.  Although, I still like to hold my controllers with both hands.
 
 
 GunKataGaming.net
 |  
	|  |  | 
	| 
		
			| Re: The Revolution controller [message #171762 is a reply to message #171662] | Fri, 16 September 2005 19:38   |  
			| 
				
				
					|  Chronojam Messages: 688
 Registered: March 2003
 
	Karma: 0
 | Colonel |  |  |  
	| Responding to what RenX said, don't forget that this will work as an infinite-axis "mouse" with rotational detection. 
 You can move it around in the air as if you were moving a mouse, but also move it up and down and turn it pitch/yaw.
 
 Don't tell me that's not full of possibilities.
 |  
	|  |  | 
	| 
		
			| Re: The Revolution controller [message #171766 is a reply to message #171662] | Fri, 16 September 2005 19:59   |  
			| 
				
				|  |  Oblivion165 Messages: 3468
 Registered: June 2003
 Location: Hendersonville, North Car...
 
	Karma: 0
 | General (3 Stars) |  |  |  
	| I really liked the sword fighting and how the guy put the attached joystick behind the controller to make a rifle. 
 Kick ass.
 
 WOL: Ob165ion Skype: Oblivion165 Yahoo Instant Messenger: CaptainJohn165
 |  
	|  |  | 
	| 
		
			| Re: The Revolution controller [message #171772 is a reply to message #171724] | Sat, 17 September 2005 00:18   |  
			| 
				
				|  |  Scythar Messages: 580
 Registered: February 2003
 Location: Finland
 
	Karma: 0
 | Colonel |  |  |  
	| | cmatt42 wrote on Fri, 16 September 2005 18:35 |  | 
 | Joseph Collins wrote on Fri, 16 September 2005 05:50 |  | All and all, though, I've gotta say that at first, my reaction to the controller was "What on Earth?!"  After a few moments and some light reading, however, I think I can see how playing a game with that would work.  I dare say I even dig the concept.
 
 | 
 
 I had similar reactions.  Although, I still like to hold my controllers with both hands.
 
 
 | 
 
 It can be used sideways like a normal pad too. That's when the lower buttons become useful.
 
 There's a hole in the sky through which things can fly.
 |  
	|  |  | 
	| 
		
			| Re: The Revolution controller [message #171938 is a reply to message #171663] | Sun, 18 September 2005 10:15   |  
			|  |  
	| | gbull wrote on Fri, 16 September 2005 04:52 |  | How can you play console games with that?
 
 | 
 
 
 
  Dreamcast Controller + TV Remote + Gamecube Controller = this.
 
 It's a mock-up made by IGN, I know... But most likely the old Gamecube controller will be the shell of the VMU-like controller Nintendo came up with.
 
 FUCK
 [Updated on: Sun, 18 September 2005 10:19] Report message to a moderator |  
	|  |  | 
	|  |