Command and Conquer: Renegade Official Forums: Tactics and Strategies

Home » Renegade Discussions » Tactics and Strategies » Stealth tank vs. Mammy

Show: Today's Messages :: Polls :: Message Navigator

Stealth tank vs. Mammy [message #-965257]

Wed, 06 November 2002 09:49

Anonymous

quote:
Originally posted by KIRBY098:
Stealth tanks should ALWAYS own mammoths. If you get smoked in a stealth by a mammy.........

Well, you are definately a newbie. (Not n00b)

I think thats the other way around, as long as the mammy has turret lock on the stealth will be iced in no time.
[Big Grin]

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		Stealth tank vs. Mammy By: Anonymous on Thu, 10 October 2002 09:56
		Stealth tank vs. Mammy By: Anonymous on Thu, 10 October 2002 13:40
		Stealth tank vs. Mammy By: Anonymous on Fri, 11 October 2002 00:03
		Stealth tank vs. Mammy By: Anonymous on Fri, 11 October 2002 17:00
		Stealth tank vs. Mammy By: Anonymous on Fri, 11 October 2002 17:10
		Stealth tank vs. Mammy By: Anonymous on Fri, 11 October 2002 06:15
		Stealth tank vs. Mammy By: Anonymous on Wed, 16 October 2002 00:23
		Stealth tank vs. Mammy By: Anonymous on Wed, 16 October 2002 07:46
		Stealth tank vs. Mammy By: Anonymous on Wed, 16 October 2002 07:55
		Stealth tank vs. Mammy By: Anonymous on Tue, 05 November 2002 21:13
		Stealth tank vs. Mammy By: Anonymous on Wed, 06 November 2002 17:01
		Stealth tank vs. Mammy By: Anonymous on Wed, 06 November 2002 07:18
		Stealth tank vs. Mammy By: Anonymous on Wed, 06 November 2002 09:49
		Stealth tank vs. Mammy By: Anonymous on Wed, 06 November 2002 22:29
		Stealth tank vs. Mammy By: Anonymous on Fri, 08 November 2002 08:09
		Stealth tank vs. Mammy By: Anonymous on Sat, 09 November 2002 03:48
		Stealth tank vs. Mammy By: Anonymous on Mon, 11 November 2002 01:20

Previous Topic:	Doing "nothing" tactic
Next Topic:	:rolleyes:

Goto Forum:

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Mon Dec 22 16:51:58 MST 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.00892 seconds