Command and Conquer: Renegade Official Forums: Tactics and Strategies

Home » Renegade Discussions » Tactics and Strategies » MRLS or Artillery?

Show: Today's Messages :: Polls :: Message Navigator

MRLS or Artillery? [message #234469]

Sat, 16 December 2006 03:55

w0dka
Messages: 181
Registered: March 2006
Location: Leipzig, Germany

Karma:

Recruit

Sometimes when i sit in such a fragile glass cannon i ask myself which is the best? Sure you can say sometimes the artillery is more useful then the MRLS but on some maps its exactly the other way round.
So which veh do you like more?

I myself hate the MRLS... because if you fight a smart oponent he would simply drive to your side and blow you to hell while you can't fire at him... Sure you shouldn't let something so close... but remember stanks... or fast vehicles...

And infantry on long range is a little bit tricky ... i missthe bodyshots with the art

But yes its the mabethe best hit&hide vehicle... a full voley of rockets do decent damage to everything while you are behind a rock reloading.

Thanks.

[Updated on: Sat, 16 December 2006 03:58]

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		MRLS or Artillery? By: w0dka on Sat, 16 December 2006 03:55
		Re: MRLS or Artillery? By: MexPirate on Sat, 16 December 2006 04:12
		Re: MRLS or Artillery? By: w0dka on Sat, 16 December 2006 04:57
		Re: MRLS or Artillery? By: MexPirate on Sat, 16 December 2006 05:45
		Re: MRLS or Artillery? By: w0dka on Sat, 16 December 2006 05:52
		Re: MRLS or Artillery? By: MexPirate on Sat, 16 December 2006 06:11
		Re: MRLS or Artillery? By: Tunaman on Sat, 16 December 2006 11:14
		Re: MRLS or Artillery? By: JPNOD on Sun, 17 December 2006 07:18
		Re: MRLS or Artillery? By: puddle_splasher on Tue, 19 December 2006 04:42
		Re: MRLS or Artillery? By: Canadacdn on Wed, 20 December 2006 19:24
		Re: MRLS or Artillery? By: fl00d3d on Wed, 20 December 2006 22:47
		Re: MRLS or Artillery? By: tompie15 on Sat, 23 December 2006 14:22
		Re: MRLS or Artillery? By: Veyrdite on Tue, 26 December 2006 23:38
		Re: MRLS or Artillery? By: Jzinsky on Fri, 29 December 2006 09:21
		Re: MRLS or Artillery? By: Uberfahr on Mon, 01 January 2007 08:25
		Re: MRLS or Artillery? By: EvilWhiteDragon on Mon, 01 January 2007 15:51
		Re: MRLS or Artillery? By: jnz on Mon, 01 January 2007 21:45
		Re: MRLS or Artillery? By: Uberfahr on Tue, 02 January 2007 04:30
		Re: MRLS or Artillery? By: MexPirate on Tue, 02 January 2007 06:41
		Re: MRLS or Artillery? By: jnz on Tue, 02 January 2007 04:39
		Re: MRLS or Artillery? By: Tunaman on Tue, 02 January 2007 08:11
		Re: MRLS or Artillery? By: Spetz5 on Wed, 10 January 2007 15:10
		Re: MRLS or Artillery? By: Sniper_De7 on Wed, 10 January 2007 15:53
		Re: MRLS or Artillery? By: Renerage on Wed, 10 January 2007 23:06
		Re: MRLS or Artillery? By: Jerad2142 on Fri, 19 January 2007 10:35
		Re: MRLS or Artillery? By: Sniper_De7 on Fri, 19 January 2007 10:56
		Re: MRLS or Artillery? By: Tunaman on Fri, 19 January 2007 13:40
		Re: MRLS or Artillery? By: mrpirate on Fri, 19 January 2007 14:09
		Re: MRLS or Artillery? By: MexPirate on Fri, 19 January 2007 14:17
		Re: MRLS or Artillery? By: DutchNeon on Tue, 23 January 2007 17:06
		Re: MRLS or Artillery? By: Jerad2142 on Wed, 24 January 2007 22:02
		Re: MRLS or Artillery? By: Veyrdite on Sat, 27 January 2007 21:58
		Re: MRLS or Artillery? By: Jerad2142 on Sun, 28 January 2007 01:00
		Re: MRLS or Artillery? By: Tunaman on Sun, 28 January 2007 01:47
		Re: MRLS or Artillery? By: Jerad2142 on Mon, 29 January 2007 07:48
		Re: MRLS or Artillery? By: Tunaman on Mon, 29 January 2007 11:21
		Re: MRLS or Artillery? By: MexPirate on Mon, 29 January 2007 17:26
		Re: MRLS or Artillery? By: Tunaman on Mon, 29 January 2007 20:31
		Re: MRLS or Artillery? By: Renerage on Mon, 29 January 2007 23:08
		Re: MRLS or Artillery? By: MexPirate on Wed, 31 January 2007 02:53

Previous Topic:	SBH stealing ur ride?
Next Topic:	Shotty=teh n00b ownz?

Goto Forum:

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Fri May 17 15:15:31 MST 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.01112 seconds