Home » General Discussions » Heated Discussions and Debates » fredcow logic
( ) 2 Votes
|
|
| Re: fredcow logic [message #479875 is a reply to message #479757] |
Thu, 14 March 2013 22:17   |
 |
nikki6ixx
Messages: 2545
Registered: August 2007
Karma: 0
|
General (2 Stars) |
|
|
^ Third worst page claim in RenForums' history.
Renegade:
| Aircraftkiller wrote on Fri, 10 January 2014 16:56 |
The only game where everyone competes to be an e-janitor.
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: fredcow logic [message #479879 is a reply to message #479851] |
Fri, 15 March 2013 02:11 |
ehhh
Messages: 2095
Registered: December 2010
Location: UK
Karma: 0
|
General (2 Stars) |
|
|
| crushu06 wrote on Thu, 14 March 2013 22:44 |
| Jesse wrote on Thu, 14 March 2013 15:30 |
Pathetic excuse for a human being.
|
Don't change the subject to trist. stay on topic please
|
go mod abuse pls
|
|
|
|
| Re: fredcow logic [message #479880 is a reply to message #479873] |
Fri, 15 March 2013 02:44 |
 |
Spoony
Messages: 3915
Registered: January 2006
Karma: 0
|
General (3 Stars)
Tactics & Strategies Moderator |
|
|
| Jesse wrote on Thu, 14 March 2013 20:52 |
So let me get this straight .. you're still hung up on the initial issue where I already admitted I phrased that wrong and rephrased that ..
|
no, you're "still hung up on it", and by "hung up on it" I mean lying about what happened (again) and using it as a feeble excuse to dodge my repeated challenge to back up your accusations of debate cheating. Everyone knows why you won't really back it up. It's because you were lying. Again.
| Quote: |
The only thing I could get you to respond to (obviously the truth to the rest of what I was saying or FACTS as you like to call them, are too much for your fragile ego to handle) was the cw.cc league thing getting ruined, which was actually just a setup to make you freak out and get angrier than you usually do.
|
no, it's because the clanwars thing was the only thing you've said so far that there's any point having a debate about, albeit a debate you've lost a dozen times over already.
| Quote: |
By the way your analogy sucks cock. There's only one renegade league on the internet, you were the only person with the connections to host one.
|
Like I said, spin it all you like, the facts are what they are. I'm the only person who could be bothered hosting one. Nothing stopped you except the fact you didn't give enough of a shit. Why don't you just be honest about THAT part at least, if nothing else? Your life is far too cool and hectic to admin a renegade league, or something.
No, spare me your excuses. I don't have magic powers nobody else has. The only reason nobody else hosted a clan ladder is nobody gave enough of a shit. Be honest about that. You mean 99% of the competitive renegade community all wanted a clan ladder, and none of them - even working together - could get anything done about it?
| Quote: |
That is in no way equivalent to someone disallowing someone into their public bowling alley. There are like thirty bowling alleys in a 20 mile radius, there is only one competitive renegade league
|
That's where the analogy doesn't quite work in reality, because bowling alleys are businesses; they're run because the owner charges the bowlers. Like I said, the correct analogy would be a bowling alley where the owner let people use it for free. I bet there aren't many of them in a 20 mile radius...
| Quote: |
which you chose to pussy out and quit at because your extremely fragile ego was scratched by some kids not disagreeing with you.
|
Yeah, ok. Because nobody EVER disagreed with me at clanwars until then, it was a new and bewildering experience 
learn your renehistory please; i'm actually quite fine with people disagreeing with me
| Quote: |
You left everyone to play in the sand with no toys over something retarded as fuck and made a huge drama queen scene about it instead of just going about business as usual, but hey, just another day in the life of Spoony I guess.
|
I'm glad you said "business as usual", because you realise what business as usual is? It's not hosting a league for you. That's the default state. Hosting a league for you is not the default state.
So we went from "spoony is hosting a league for clearshot and simpee" to "spoony is not hosting a league for clearshot and simpee". If I'm a terrible person for joining that second category, then so are you... so, for that matter, are clearshot and simpee. They never hosted a league for me, nor did you. If you think clearshot and simpee deserve a clan league to play on, then the only sensible thing for you to say to me is to thank me for hosting one for them for so long, in spite of the despicable way they treated me for no reason. No fucker else did, now did they? Nobody gave enough of a shit about them. They just pretend they do.
| Quote: |
I'm glad you ignored all the FACTS I provided about how shitty your life is. I guess you already realize there's no rebuttal though so at least that's a step forward.
|
Uh no. Firstly you were guessing about what my life is like; secondly this is not the "life forum", thirdly I don't seem to care whether you're impressed by my social life as much as you do?
if you recall, the last time you tried guessing about my life was when you went berserk on christmas eve a couple of years ago; you said my parents must be divorced and must have been abusing me because that's the only reason anybody would ever be an atheist.
(I'll correct that one - my parents are happily married and have been since their twenties. In defence of divorce, though, I do have a few friends whose parents are divorced, and I'll take their company over yours anyway; their parents may be divorced but they're still far less obnoxious than you are)
Of the "facts" (see: guesses) you've offered about what my life is like, the only one you were right about was my age. That's not quite the insult you seem to think it is, by the way. I will say that when I was your age I wasn't playing computer games, and I expect that'll probably sound like an insult, but just remember that I don't care what your hobbies are; I wish you well of them.
| Quote: |
What time is it there that you responded? Like 4:30 AM? Perfect time to be keyboard warrioring on a forum that has no relevance to you anymore for a game you no longer play and renegade players you should no longer want to associate with.
|
Doesn't matter what time. Probably 2-3. I'm a bit of a night owl, mainly because of my job. I could tell you what that is, but why? Who cares?
| Quote: |
Oh well, who am I to judge, I've seen worse in this community, two examples have already posted in this thread. It's always the anti-socials that band together, yet they still don't get anymore social. I never understand it.
|
You're right about one thing - you don't understand it. You're young and foolish, and you'll learn. All this stuff about someone's social life just shows you're a big silly. You'll learn that "having a life" simply means doing what you want to do. Likewise a person's job is not a point of shame unless it's something immoral. You meant these things as insults; you're only showing that you don't know very much about life, really. But that's ok, you're just young. Where you ARE going wrong is bitching at people for either playing renegade (or not playing renegade) and saying stuff on forums. Like I said, doesn't matter what a person's hobbies are, it's up to them to have fun with it - but why call someone a sad bastard because they're playing the same game you're playing, and posting on the same forum on which you're posting? Tell me, do your real life friends know how seriously you take this computer game? Would you be embarrassed if they did know?
| Quote: |
Keep calling me angry, it's actually kind of hilarious because it's not true at all but instead of responding to anything that you know is true you always just call the person angry. What is it that you're so insecure about really?
|
Well, kiddo, you keep calling me stuff too; difference is I challenged you to back it up several times and you've made it very clear you couldn't.
I know a funny joke, by the way.
- How do you know Anthrax isn't angry?
- He tells you.
| Quote: |
I hope you're still awake ready to respond to this within the next hour too; I'm sure as hell AirCraftKiller is too busy not caring and having a life to respond so I need someone to talk to.
|
That stuff you were saying to him about hovering over the f5 button - that only applies to him and not you, does it?
| Quote: |
It's funny, when I first started playing this game (10 years ago now) I used to think SH0WBlZ was a pretty intelligent and hilarious mother fucker, I almost had the same kind of infatuation for you that liquidv2 has now.
|
Ah. There's something I forgot to say. Have you noticed that when someone agrees with you against me, it proves you're right (see the "15-1" and "99%" thing, but when someone agrees with me against you (see this thread) there's obviously something fishy going on? Liquid and Aircraftkiller are my butt buddies who are ganging up on you for ulterior motives? Noobie please. Someone is quite capable of looking at a situation and thinking you're an idiot as well. (For the record, I've debated both of those two people on plenty of other issues)
| Quote: |
But after receiving an education it's actually hilarious as hell to read your debates and diagnose all your character flaws.
|
Enjoy. Like I said, we all need a hobby and whatever yours are are your own affair.
| Quote: |
I wish I would have been more intelligent when I was younger to realize what kind of rejects peruse this forum non-stop. Internet addiction is a real thing, and you guys can still seek help!
|
Uh ok. I glance at forums maybe once a week or so, usually less than that.
| Quote: |
Anyways, this post will clearly upset you so I know you won't respond to any of it directly
|
ah, another thing you "know"
| Quote: |
you'll just deflect towards me and call me angry and tell me I'm lying because I can't find evidence to a question you've never answered even though you said you could provide me many examples (you've yet to do such a thing and you know you can't).
|
Like I said, spin it all you like - the important point is you were repeatedly challenged to back up your accusations with evidence, and you can't - because you were lying.
As for the nonsense you asked me about where are the debates I lost, take a good look at what a bad question that is. What a silly point to try to prove, it's barely even a point at all. Why aren't you posting these debates where I lost and did some form of debate cheating to get myself out of it? We all know why - because you can't. You were lying.
By the way, you owe me a retraction and an apology for calling me a liar several times. I've challenged you to back this up with evidence and you've made it perfectly clear you can't. I value honesty very highly; I won't lie even to scum like you. You should withdraw it and apologise. (You won't though, you haven't the balls or the intellectual honesty)
Unleash the Renerageâ„¢
Renedrama [ren-i-drah-muh]
- noun
1. the inevitable criticism one receives after doing something awful
[Updated on: Fri, 15 March 2013 03:25] Report message to a moderator |
|
|
|
| Re: fredcow logic [message #479881 is a reply to message #479855] |
Fri, 15 March 2013 03:56 |
 |
liquidv2
Messages: 3407
Registered: February 2007
Karma: 0
|
General (3 Stars) |
|
|
| Jesse wrote on Thu, 14 March 2013 18:45 |
I know you're waiting for your posse of fanboys to gang up on me hoping I'll get discouraged like any of your previous "victims". Fact is I have no idea why so many of these lowlifes idolize you, maybe it's because they have so much in common with you. You seem to think me telling you the truth ( a truth you obviously can't admit to) is equivalent to getting angry. You're what .. 30 something? Single? Don't play renegade but still religiously search your name in the search box at least once a day of every major renegade forum? Have absolutely no relevance to this game anymore after single handedly destroying the competitive side of it? Challenge people to e-debates and declare yourself the winner every time after the person you're "debating" commits seppuku out of disgrace to the fact that they even wasted their time gracing you with a rebuttal?
|
i don't get it; why don't you answer his two simple questions? all he did was ask you to back up your opinion, and you're dodging it harder than trooprm02 ever dodged anything
what do you mean by "single handedly destroying the competitive side"? you mean clanwars? without him it wouldn't have existed in the first place (not sure if you remember, or actually understand that)
you speak so fondly of smak forums and whatnot, so i'm confused by your statement
you're gracing Spoony with a rebuttal? you're not even able to back up your very first few posts; why are you still posting at all? i blame the derfcow within you 
| Jesse wrote on Thu, 14 March 2013 18:45 |
I'm actually trying to help you, I'm currently enrolled in a 400 level abnormal psychology course and could probably give you a free consultation, assessment and diagnosis of your symptoms if you'd like. My treat for such a well respected member of the renegade community.
|
| Jesse wrote on Thu, 14 March 2013 18:45 |
I'd really like to find the source of your insecurities and misguided narcissism. You're obviously compensating for something and I'd be more than willing to help you out if you'd let me. The funny thing about you stating that you're most interested in being right is that when you tell your mind you're right, you're always right. You're only right in your mind, and that's all you'll ever be, but at least you have a 100% streak of correctness. As long as it's in your head that you're right you're always right man! You can be outnumbered 15-1 but hey, you're Spoony.
|
rather than lecture him on something i'm sure he already knows, why not answer his simple questions (which were even more simple than you think - they asked you to back up your own words)
| Jesse wrote on Thu, 14 March 2013 18:45 |
Other famous people in power that have never been wrong: Fidel Castro, Adolf Hitler, Joseph Stalin, Saddam Hussein, Osama Bin Laden, and Hugo Chavez. So glad you ran Cw.cc with an iron fist, I would have been so disappointed if the competitive aspect of this game would have been around the last five years. Good thing you'd never let something so petty tear your community apart just to make sure your ego didn't deflate at all. Wouldn't want to lose a bit of that e-reputation or anything.
|
i was under the assumption you hardly clanned at any point in the past 5 or more years (that's based off your own words); with that being said, you seem rather upset that clanwars is no longer active
|
|
|
|
| Re: fredcow logic [message #479882 is a reply to message #479873] |
Fri, 15 March 2013 04:26 |
|
liquidv2
Messages: 3407
Registered: February 2007
Karma: 0
|
General (3 Stars) |
|
|
| Jesse wrote on Thu, 14 March 2013 22:52 |
By the way your analogy sucks cock. There's only one renegade league on the internet, you were the only person with the connections to host one. That is in no way equivalent to someone disallowing someone into their public bowling alley. There are like thirty bowling alleys in a 20 mile radius, there is only one competitive renegade league which you chose to pussy out and quit at because your extremely fragile ego was scratched by some kids not disagreeing with you. An equivalent analogy for this would be you being the kid to go home crying with his sandbox toys because you were building a sand castle and little tommy accidentally ran your toe over with your tonka truck.  You left everyone to play in the sand with no toys over something retarded as fuck and made a huge drama queen scene about it instead of just going about business as usual, but hey, just another day in the life of Spoony I guess.
|
like Spoony already explained, it's your analogy that doesn't hold up here (and it's easy to point out why)
pretend Renegade is a small unknown town in Wisconsin, and Spoony opened up a bowling alley - he let anyone come to it, and only kicked out people that broke the bowling alley rules (the few people banned for cheating or faking their bowling scores over the years)
i like both simpee and clearsh0t, but i wasn't around clanwars.cc during any of this - in this example, they are two of the most-known townsfolk in Renegade, Wisconsin
they tend to give the guy running the bowling alley crap, and after a while (several years, literally) he decides he's had enough and bans them from his bowling alley
in this case, you and a number of other people are angry at the guy running the bowling alley for not running it the way you want him to; why not make your own bowling alley, and why did no one else do so? he was quite honestly not the only one that could have run a bowling alley; if that thought is what prevented people from doing so, that's their problem (i don't understand why it would be his)
rather than making another bowling alley, people decided to just bowl in the streets, their front yards, and basements and whatnot (simpee and clearsh0t eventually moved away from Renegade, Wisconsin, and stop by on occasion)
| Jesse wrote on Thu, 14 March 2013 22:52 |
I'm glad you ignored all the FACTS I provided about how shitty your life is. I guess you already realize there's no rebuttal though so at least that's a step forward. What time is it there that you responded? Like 4:30 AM? Perfect time to be keyboard warrioring on a forum that has no relevance to you anymore for a game you no longer play and renegade players you should no longer want to associate with. Oh well, who am I to judge, I've seen worse in this community, two examples have already posted in this thread. It's always the anti-socials that band together, yet they still don't get anymore social. I never understand it. Keep calling me angry, it's actually kind of hilarious because it's not true at all but instead of responding to anything that you know is true you always just call the person angry. What is it that you're so insecure about really? I hope you're still awake ready to respond to this within the next hour too; I'm sure as hell AirCraftKiller is too busy not caring and having a life to respond so I need someone to talk to.
|
like Spoony said, i don't understand why any of that has anything to do with this topic
if Spoony's job was cleaning up old people poop all day or something would it make you feel less bad about being wrong? or would you say "Hey, all you do is clean up old people poop, so your words have no validity"
that's the kind of thinking people had in the old days of kings and whatnot; Spoony is an example of civilized society, where the only thing that matters is what's right and not who's saying it
this shouldn't be too hard to understand, but since you haven't gotten it already i don't think you're going to
| Jesse wrote on Thu, 14 March 2013 22:52 |
It's funny, when I first started playing this game (10 years ago now) I used to think SH0WBlZ was a pretty intelligent and hilarious mother fucker, I almost had the same kind of infatuation for you that liquidv2 has now. But after receiving an education it's actually hilarious as hell to read your debates and diagnose all your character flaws. I wish I would have been more intelligent when I was younger to realize what kind of rejects peruse this forum non-stop. Internet addiction is a real thing, and you guys can still seek help!
|
if Spoony is a sad nerd for being right on the internet, what does that say about you? you can't handle being wrong on the internet - that makes you a winner somehow?
if Spoony was wrong at least he would admit it; i think that's how people should be, but it's less and less how people are becoming
before you say "SPOONY CANNOT BE WRONG, FOR HE IS SPOONY," look back and tell me where he didn't let people try to prove it - it seems to me like you're blaming him because they couldn't
if Spoony lost a bet to me in person, i'm dead certain he would pay up for it (i doubt you would, based on how this is going)
| Jesse wrote on Thu, 14 March 2013 22:52 |
So please just stop responding if you're not going to do anything but troll. It really is pathetic, even for you Spoonerd.
|
all he's doing is rationally addressing your points; you seem upset with him because your points don't hold up
rather than blaming him, you should consider the point that you may be wrong about something
you can call me a bad person if you like, but i don't highly value the opinions of others if they can in no way, shape, or form back them up or validate them
and i don't see why anyone else should either
|
|
|
|
| Re: fredcow logic [message #479891 is a reply to message #479880] |
Fri, 15 March 2013 10:36 |
InternetThug
Messages: 1036
Registered: October 2005
Location: vagina
Karma: 0
|
General (1 Star) |
|
|
| Spoony wrote on Fri, 15 March 2013 02:44 |
| Jesse wrote on Thu, 14 March 2013 20:52 |
So let me get this straight .. you're still hung up on the initial issue where I already admitted I phrased that wrong and rephrased that ..
|
no, you're "still hung up on it", and by "hung up on it" I mean lying about what happened (again) and using it as a feeble excuse to dodge my repeated challenge to back up your accusations of debate cheating. Everyone knows why you won't really back it up. It's because you were lying. Again.
| Quote: |
The only thing I could get you to respond to (obviously the truth to the rest of what I was saying or FACTS as you like to call them, are too much for your fragile ego to handle) was the cw.cc league thing getting ruined, which was actually just a setup to make you freak out and get angrier than you usually do.
|
no, it's because the clanwars thing was the only thing you've said so far that there's any point having a debate about, albeit a debate you've lost a dozen times over already.
| Quote: |
By the way your analogy sucks cock. There's only one renegade league on the internet, you were the only person with the connections to host one.
|
Like I said, spin it all you like, the facts are what they are. I'm the only person who could be bothered hosting one. Nothing stopped you except the fact you didn't give enough of a shit. Why don't you just be honest about THAT part at least, if nothing else? Your life is far too cool and hectic to admin a renegade league, or something.
No, spare me your excuses. I don't have magic powers nobody else has. The only reason nobody else hosted a clan ladder is nobody gave enough of a shit. Be honest about that. You mean 99% of the competitive renegade community all wanted a clan ladder, and none of them - even working together - could get anything done about it?
| Quote: |
That is in no way equivalent to someone disallowing someone into their public bowling alley. There are like thirty bowling alleys in a 20 mile radius, there is only one competitive renegade league
|
That's where the analogy doesn't quite work in reality, because bowling alleys are businesses; they're run because the owner charges the bowlers. Like I said, the correct analogy would be a bowling alley where the owner let people use it for free. I bet there aren't many of them in a 20 mile radius...
| Quote: |
which you chose to pussy out and quit at because your extremely fragile ego was scratched by some kids not disagreeing with you.
|
Yeah, ok. Because nobody EVER disagreed with me at clanwars until then, it was a new and bewildering experience
learn your renehistory please; i'm actually quite fine with people disagreeing with me
| Quote: |
You left everyone to play in the sand with no toys over something retarded as fuck and made a huge drama queen scene about it instead of just going about business as usual, but hey, just another day in the life of Spoony I guess.
|
I'm glad you said "business as usual", because you realise what business as usual is? It's not hosting a league for you. That's the default state. Hosting a league for you is not the default state.
So we went from "spoony is hosting a league for clearshot and simpee" to "spoony is not hosting a league for clearshot and simpee". If I'm a terrible person for joining that second category, then so are you... so, for that matter, are clearshot and simpee. They never hosted a league for me, nor did you. If you think clearshot and simpee deserve a clan league to play on, then the only sensible thing for you to say to me is to thank me for hosting one for them for so long, in spite of the despicable way they treated me for no reason. No fucker else did, now did they? Nobody gave enough of a shit about them. They just pretend they do.
| Quote: |
I'm glad you ignored all the FACTS I provided about how shitty your life is. I guess you already realize there's no rebuttal though so at least that's a step forward.
|
Uh no. Firstly you were guessing about what my life is like; secondly this is not the "life forum", thirdly I don't seem to care whether you're impressed by my social life as much as you do?
if you recall, the last time you tried guessing about my life was when you went berserk on christmas eve a couple of years ago; you said my parents must be divorced and must have been abusing me because that's the only reason anybody would ever be an atheist.
(I'll correct that one - my parents are happily married and have been since their twenties. In defence of divorce, though, I do have a few friends whose parents are divorced, and I'll take their company over yours anyway; their parents may be divorced but they're still far less obnoxious than you are)
Of the "facts" (see: guesses) you've offered about what my life is like, the only one you were right about was my age. That's not quite the insult you seem to think it is, by the way. I will say that when I was your age I wasn't playing computer games, and I expect that'll probably sound like an insult, but just remember that I don't care what your hobbies are; I wish you well of them.
| Quote: |
What time is it there that you responded? Like 4:30 AM? Perfect time to be keyboard warrioring on a forum that has no relevance to you anymore for a game you no longer play and renegade players you should no longer want to associate with.
|
Doesn't matter what time. Probably 2-3. I'm a bit of a night owl, mainly because of my job. I could tell you what that is, but why? Who cares?
| Quote: |
Oh well, who am I to judge, I've seen worse in this community, two examples have already posted in this thread. It's always the anti-socials that band together, yet they still don't get anymore social. I never understand it.
|
You're right about one thing - you don't understand it. You're young and foolish, and you'll learn. All this stuff about someone's social life just shows you're a big silly. You'll learn that "having a life" simply means doing what you want to do. Likewise a person's job is not a point of shame unless it's something immoral. You meant these things as insults; you're only showing that you don't know very much about life, really. But that's ok, you're just young. Where you ARE going wrong is bitching at people for either playing renegade (or not playing renegade) and saying stuff on forums. Like I said, doesn't matter what a person's hobbies are, it's up to them to have fun with it - but why call someone a sad bastard because they're playing the same game you're playing, and posting on the same forum on which you're posting? Tell me, do your real life friends know how seriously you take this computer game? Would you be embarrassed if they did know?
| Quote: |
Keep calling me angry, it's actually kind of hilarious because it's not true at all but instead of responding to anything that you know is true you always just call the person angry. What is it that you're so insecure about really?
|
Well, kiddo, you keep calling me stuff too; difference is I challenged you to back it up several times and you've made it very clear you couldn't.
I know a funny joke, by the way.
- How do you know Anthrax isn't angry?
- He tells you.
| Quote: |
I hope you're still awake ready to respond to this within the next hour too; I'm sure as hell AirCraftKiller is too busy not caring and having a life to respond so I need someone to talk to.
|
That stuff you were saying to him about hovering over the f5 button - that only applies to him and not you, does it?
| Quote: |
It's funny, when I first started playing this game (10 years ago now) I used to think SH0WBlZ was a pretty intelligent and hilarious mother fucker, I almost had the same kind of infatuation for you that liquidv2 has now.
|
Ah. There's something I forgot to say. Have you noticed that when someone agrees with you against me, it proves you're right (see the "15-1" and "99%" thing, but when someone agrees with me against you (see this thread) there's obviously something fishy going on? Liquid and Aircraftkiller are my butt buddies who are ganging up on you for ulterior motives? Noobie please. Someone is quite capable of looking at a situation and thinking you're an idiot as well. (For the record, I've debated both of those two people on plenty of other issues)
| Quote: |
But after receiving an education it's actually hilarious as hell to read your debates and diagnose all your character flaws.
|
Enjoy. Like I said, we all need a hobby and whatever yours are are your own affair.
| Quote: |
I wish I would have been more intelligent when I was younger to realize what kind of rejects peruse this forum non-stop. Internet addiction is a real thing, and you guys can still seek help!
|
Uh ok. I glance at forums maybe once a week or so, usually less than that.
| Quote: |
Anyways, this post will clearly upset you so I know you won't respond to any of it directly
|
ah, another thing you "know"
| Quote: |
you'll just deflect towards me and call me angry and tell me I'm lying because I can't find evidence to a question you've never answered even though you said you could provide me many examples (you've yet to do such a thing and you know you can't).
|
Like I said, spin it all you like - the important point is you were repeatedly challenged to back up your accusations with evidence, and you can't - because you were lying.
As for the nonsense you asked me about where are the debates I lost, take a good look at what a bad question that is. What a silly point to try to prove, it's barely even a point at all. Why aren't you posting these debates where I lost and did some form of debate cheating to get myself out of it? We all know why - because you can't. You were lying.
By the way, you owe me a retraction and an apology for calling me a liar several times. I've challenged you to back this up with evidence and you've made it perfectly clear you can't. I value honesty very highly; I won't lie even to scum like you. You should withdraw it and apologise. (You won't though, you haven't the balls or the intellectual honesty)
|
All this and you still are avoiding the initial question? Really? Haha too funny. Why are you more entitled to having your questions answered than I am? We're both playing the same game, only difference is you've yet to respond to the question that I asked you first. Really this whole debate could have been avoided if you'd just answer it. It was a matter of opinion on your side so I don't really see how there can be evidence for it. It's funny though all these years you've been accusing people of not having lives, now that's it's turned on you you couldn't give a shit apparently? Funny how the stance has changed when you take a second to look in the mirror.
Liquid just shut up because anything you say is ad hominem trying to insult my intelligence and it just fails, you couldn't even last two years in college and are probably working minimum wage at Walmart right now. The meme you posted is about Psychology 101, I'm in Psychology 403 which is Psychology for majors, you weren't in college very long so you probably don't even know the difference, so you're forgiven. I don't know where your ego comes from and the subtle arrogant undertones in everything you write is really pathetic; you have nothing to be proud of. I can't even bother rebutting what you say because you'll just try to Spoony me but it fails so hard. I am proud of you for finding a girlfriend and doing something with your life, I hope it all works out in the long run. I'd much rather hang out with derfcow than your awkward ass though.
BTW cool guys my spring break starts this week so don't be expecting any replies not saying I won't respond but it's a lot harder to get internet access and this isn't that enthralling, though I was hoping I could benefit both Spoony and liquid from it. Spoony I know you read this forum at least once a day because any time your name is mentioned you respond within 24 hours (it's not a coincidence every time, and also it's hilarious how you have a 6th sense for knowing you're mentioned, clearly gotta search your name every day and make sure no one is bashing your e-rep).
[Updated on: Fri, 15 March 2013 10:46] Report message to a moderator |
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: fredcow logic [message #479893 is a reply to message #479892] |
Fri, 15 March 2013 10:43 |
InternetThug
Messages: 1036
Registered: October 2005
Location: vagina
Karma: 0
|
General (1 Star) |
|
|
| Good-One-Driver wrote on Fri, 15 March 2013 10:39 |
Does Spoony even play this game anymore?
|
No and neither does liquid but they're the two biggest e-warriors around because renforums is obviously a place that gives them a sense of comfort and is very important to keep a reputation on.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: fredcow logic [message #479895 is a reply to message #479894] |
Fri, 15 March 2013 10:52 |
InternetThug
Messages: 1036
Registered: October 2005
Location: vagina
Karma: 0
|
General (1 Star) |
|
|
| ehhh wrote on Fri, 15 March 2013 10:46 |
liquid still plays, rarely though
anthrax is such a cool guy though
|
I've learned from the coolest, Tristan.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: fredcow logic [message #479899 is a reply to message #479897] |
Fri, 15 March 2013 18:58 |
InternetThug
Messages: 1036
Registered: October 2005
Location: vagina
Karma: 0
|
General (1 Star) |
|
|
| Starbuzz wrote on Fri, 15 March 2013 15:09 |
It's fucking hilarious to see a guy falsely accusing someone of using manipulation and lies to win debates employ the very same techniques while demanding from the falsely-accused his own evidence of past manipulation.
|
Lol okay? Captain retard comes out of left field. I'm still not seeing where I accused him of manipulation and lies .. I'm just asking if he's ever lost an arguement in his own mind. Should be a simple yes or no answer .. nothing to slit your wrists over. I know you hate to see your god be questioned but I promise its not a tough one. God damn you people are fucking weird. This is such a simple question and you're all acting like I'm accusing him of pedophilia. The fact he keeps dodging and hoping his fan base cover his ass is even funnier than the fact that you cockriders actually attempt to.
|
|
|
|
| Re: fredcow logic [message #479901 is a reply to message #479757] |
Fri, 15 March 2013 21:18 |
|
liquidv2
Messages: 3407
Registered: February 2007
Karma: 0
|
General (3 Stars) |
|
|
| Jesse wrote on Fri, 15 March 2013 12:36 |
Liquid just shut up because anything you say is ad hominem trying to insult my intelligence and it just fails, you couldn't even last two years in college and are probably working minimum wage at Walmart right now. The meme you posted is about Psychology 101, I'm in Psychology 403 which is Psychology for majors, you weren't in college very long so you probably don't even know the difference, so you're forgiven. I don't know where your ego comes from and the subtle arrogant undertones in everything you write is really pathetic; you have nothing to be proud of. I can't even bother rebutting what you say because you'll just try to Spoony me but it fails so hard. I am proud of you for finding a girlfriend and doing something with your life, I hope it all works out in the long run. I'd much rather hang out with derfcow than your awkward ass though.
|
i'm no more awkward than you are; even if i wasn't, it doesn't change what i said
i don't expect you to reply to what i said (i know you couldn't, and dodging is nothing new to you) ((HaTe 1v1 ringing any bells?))
i've lasted longer than two years in college - i did stop going for a while, but it was because i ran out of money and didn't want to take out loans (what's the point in racking up a large amount of debt when you're still unsure what you want to do? unlike you my mother and father didn't entirely pay for my education, but you can hold that against me if you want to)
if i recall correctly, you're the one that didn't last two years in college (even though it was entirely paid for) - i'm not going to hold that against you, even though you tried to do the exact same to me just now
here's the topic in a nutshell: Spoony asked you to back up your statements, and you didn't (but you refuse to retract them, which basically removes your validity and shows you're an indecent person)
not sure why you expect Spoony to answer a question after the above statement has been brought to light
the only other person to accuse me of being egotistical or arrogant is shaitard; i'm really not in the slightest (he mistakes blunt honesty for arrogance)
i'm merely pointing out the error in your ways, and you're not understanding it and becoming frustrated (you can believe i'm wrong, but you're not going to be able to show or prove it, which in my mind should raise a red flag for you)
if DJ wasn't so damn retarded i'd think he was actually trolling because he described himself to a tee in his own post
i'm sure you'd get along with derfcow just fine
enjoy your spring break
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: fredcow logic [message #479904 is a reply to message #479899] |
Fri, 15 March 2013 22:09 |
 |
Starbuzz
Messages: 2487
Registered: May 2007
Karma: 2
|
General (2 Stars) |
|
|
| Jesse wrote on Fri, 15 March 2013 21:58 |
I'm still not seeing where I accused him of manipulation and lies
|
re-read one of your posts on page two.
| Jesse wrote on Fri, 15 March 2013 21:58 |
The fact he keeps dodging
|
he didn't dodge jackshit. You asked him a question:
| Jesse wrote on Wed, 13 March 2013 09:54 |
Tell me Spoony, off the top of your head, what's one thing in your 10 year existence in the renegade community that you've ever admitted to being wrong about?
|
he answered it:
| Spoony wrote on Wed, 13 March 2013 11:31 |
- unbanning robo
- letting people AR games when warrior names didn't match if someone on the losing team said it was ok
|
you moved the goalposts:
| Jesse wrote on Wed, 13 March 2013 11:37 |
No both those things aren't relevant, I'm talking about an actual debate.. not something you did and later regretted ..
|
then, liquid precisely summarized what has happened to every opponent who has ever debated Spoony:
| liquidv2 wrote on Thu, 14 March 2013 00:49 |
Spoony reasons people into a corner, and they can accept it or pretend it never happened and/or ignore it
|
and we are now in page three because you are a mentally obese illiterate who is still in raging denial.
Enjoy:
| Spoony wrote on Fri, 15 March 2013 05:44 |
Why aren't you posting these debates where I lost and did some form of debate cheating to get myself out of it? We all know why - because you can't. You were lying.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: fredcow logic [message #479909 is a reply to message #479891] |
Sat, 16 March 2013 05:56 |
|
Spoony
Messages: 3915
Registered: January 2006
Karma: 0
|
General (3 Stars)
Tactics & Strategies Moderator |
|
|
| Jesse wrote on Fri, 15 March 2013 10:36 |
All this and you still are avoiding the initial question? Really? Haha too funny. Why are you more entitled to having your questions answered than I am?
|
two reasons
1. I already answered your question. you can lie about what happened all you like, but the thing about forums is people can see what you said and what I said.
2. your question was inane and pointless, whereas my question was challenging you to back up some accusations you made
| Quote: |
We're both playing the same game, only difference is you've yet to respond to the question that I asked you first. Really this whole debate could have been avoided if you'd just answer it.
|
it could also be avoided if you weren't obsessed with whether or not I've lost internet arguments or not; you certainly care about it much more than I do
| Quote: |
It was a matter of opinion on your side so I don't really see how there can be evidence for it.
|
any old excuse eh? if I really was guilty of these underhand debate tactics you've accused me of, if I do it all the time as you keep saying, why can't you prove it? I haven't gone back and deleted posts from old arguments, so why can't you prove I did what you said I did? This would be A LOT easier to prove than someone was in-game cheating, because all the posts are still there; it's like you have the whole game on fraps.
so why can't you? everybody knows why you can't... because you were lying
| Quote: |
It's funny though all these years you've been accusing people of not having lives, now that's it's turned on you you couldn't give a shit apparently? Funny how the stance has changed when you take a second to look in the mirror.
|
What? Are you confusing me with someone else? I don't care whether someone else "has a life" or not. I don't even recognise that as a coherent accusation. In my mind, having a life means doing what you want to do, it's that simple. I've been saying that for years, actually...
| Quote: |
Liquid just shut up because anything you say is ad hominem trying to insult my intelligence and it just fails
|
Nobody needs to insult your intelligence. Since you're quite happy to attempt to diagnose complex mental issues over the internet, you won't mind my observation that you are not only thoroughly obnoxious, you also are clearly not very intelligent. One doesn't need qualifications in psychology to see that.
It's not your fault, of course, though being so obnoxious probably is.
| Quote: |
I don't know where your ego comes from and the subtle arrogant undertones in everything you write is really pathetic; you have nothing to be proud of.
|
You're studying psychology and you don't know where a person's ego comes from? Seriously? Do you even know what ego means? You throw the word around an awful lot, but... I suspect you mean egotism, which is just not the same thing. It's a forgivable mistake for anybody who isn't throwing their weight around as a big bad psychologist making these ridiculous attempts to diagnose other people's mental illnesses; you could at least try to sound like you know the basics.
| Quote: |
I can't even bother rebutting what you say because you'll just try to Spoony me but it fails so hard.
|
Yeah, every time you can't rebut someone it's always because they're cheating, isn't it? Like I said, you're exactly the same as the guy who cries *cheat name removed*every time he loses. It is exactly the same situation. To carry the analogy over, you're doing the debate equivalent of repeatedly falling out of your apache and accusing the enemy of using some cheat that MAKES you fall out. One of these days you will figure out that you're just not very good at debating, because you're fundamentally dishonest, not very intelligent, overly obnoxious, and rarely if ever have the facts on your side.
| Quote: |
Spoony I know you read this forum at least once a day because any time your name is mentioned you respond within 24 hours (it's not a coincidence every time, and also it's hilarious how you have a 6th sense for knowing you're mentioned, clearly gotta search your name every day and make sure no one is bashing your e-rep).
|
Really? It seems like there's a simple way to check this - we can search for "spoony", look at the first batch of results - let's say the first page - and see how many of those I replied to in 24 hours. But is there any point? If it turns out you're wrong again, will you just dodge it again and go on to the next accusation, like you've done thus far?
I probably confused you a bit there when I proposed how to check it, because ljbh you do seem rather allergic to evidence; look at your abysmal failure to back up your earlier accusations, look at that healthcare thread where Aircraftkiller kept asking you for citations for what you were saying and you failed just as badly there.
| Quote: |
No and neither does liquid but they're the two biggest e-warriors around because renforums is obviously a place that gives them a sense of comfort and is very important to keep a reputation on.
|
Can you quickly just explain what an "e-warrior" is, and why you aren't one?
| Quote: |
Lol okay? Captain retard comes out of left field. I'm still not seeing where I accused him of manipulation and lies ..
|
Wow, seriously?
On page one you said something which I didn't respond to at the time because I figured you must have been joking. You said talking to me makes you forget what you were talking about. Seriously? On a FORUM, where you can go back and look at what you were talking about any time you like? I didn't think you actually meant that seriously, but now... dude. Think about this. You've already forgotten calling me a liar (which doesn't really surprise me, because you obviously don't think honesty is worth much), and accusing me of underhand debate tactics? Barely two days ago and you've already forgotten? That is worrying.
| Quote: |
I'm just asking if he's ever lost an arguement in his own mind. Should be a simple yes or no answer .. nothing to slit your wrists over.
|
You're right with the last part - because the answer is "who cares?" I certainly don't. Why do you?
| Quote: |
I know you hate to see your god be questioned but I promise its not a tough one. God damn you people are fucking weird. This is such a simple question and you're all acting like I'm accusing him of pedophilia. The fact he keeps dodging and hoping his fan base cover his ass is even funnier than the fact that you cockriders actually attempt to.
|
I don't particularly care whether or not anyone else thinks you're making a fool of yourself too.
edit: as to your fury towards starbuzz, remember what I said a few posts ago. when someone agrees with you against me, it proves you're right; when someone agrees with me against you, there must be something fishy going on
Unleash the Renerageâ„¢
Renedrama [ren-i-drah-muh]
- noun
1. the inevitable criticism one receives after doing something awful
[Updated on: Sat, 16 March 2013 06:44] Report message to a moderator |
|
|
|
| Re: fredcow logic [message #479910 is a reply to message #479909] |
Sat, 16 March 2013 08:37 |
InternetThug
Messages: 1036
Registered: October 2005
Location: vagina
Karma: 0
|
General (1 Star) |
|
|
| Spoony wrote on Sat, 16 March 2013 05:56 |
| Jesse wrote on Fri, 15 March 2013 10:36 |
All this and you still are avoiding the initial question? Really? Haha too funny. Why are you more entitled to having your questions answered than I am?
|
two reasons
1. I already answered your question. you can lie about what happened all you like, but the thing about forums is people can see what you said and what I said.
2. your question was inane and pointless, whereas my question was challenging you to back up some accusations you made
| Quote: |
We're both playing the same game, only difference is you've yet to respond to the question that I asked you first. Really this whole debate could have been avoided if you'd just answer it.
|
it could also be avoided if you weren't obsessed with whether or not I've lost internet arguments or not; you certainly care about it much more than I do
| Quote: |
It was a matter of opinion on your side so I don't really see how there can be evidence for it.
|
any old excuse eh? if I really was guilty of these underhand debate tactics you've accused me of, if I do it all the time as you keep saying, why can't you prove it? I haven't gone back and deleted posts from old arguments, so why can't you prove I did what you said I did? This would be A LOT easier to prove than someone was in-game cheating, because all the posts are still there; it's like you have the whole game on fraps.
so why can't you? everybody knows why you can't... because you were lying
| Quote: |
It's funny though all these years you've been accusing people of not having lives, now that's it's turned on you you couldn't give a shit apparently? Funny how the stance has changed when you take a second to look in the mirror.
|
What? Are you confusing me with someone else? I don't care whether someone else "has a life" or not. I don't even recognise that as a coherent accusation. In my mind, having a life means doing what you want to do, it's that simple. I've been saying that for years, actually...
| Quote: |
Liquid just shut up because anything you say is ad hominem trying to insult my intelligence and it just fails
|
Nobody needs to insult your intelligence. Since you're quite happy to attempt to diagnose complex mental issues over the internet, you won't mind my observation that you are not only thoroughly obnoxious, you also are clearly not very intelligent. One doesn't need qualifications in psychology to see that.
It's not your fault, of course, though being so obnoxious probably is.
| Quote: |
I don't know where your ego comes from and the subtle arrogant undertones in everything you write is really pathetic; you have nothing to be proud of.
|
You're studying psychology and you don't know where a person's ego comes from? Seriously? Do you even know what ego means? You throw the word around an awful lot, but... I suspect you mean egotism, which is just not the same thing. It's a forgivable mistake for anybody who isn't throwing their weight around as a big bad psychologist making these ridiculous attempts to diagnose other people's mental illnesses; you could at least try to sound like you know the basics.
| Quote: |
I can't even bother rebutting what you say because you'll just try to Spoony me but it fails so hard.
|
Yeah, every time you can't rebut someone it's always because they're cheating, isn't it? Like I said, you're exactly the same as the guy who cries *cheat name removed*every time he loses. It is exactly the same situation. To carry the analogy over, you're doing the debate equivalent of repeatedly falling out of your apache and accusing the enemy of using some cheat that MAKES you fall out. One of these days you will figure out that you're just not very good at debating, because you're fundamentally dishonest, not very intelligent, overly obnoxious, and rarely if ever have the facts on your side.
| Quote: |
Spoony I know you read this forum at least once a day because any time your name is mentioned you respond within 24 hours (it's not a coincidence every time, and also it's hilarious how you have a 6th sense for knowing you're mentioned, clearly gotta search your name every day and make sure no one is bashing your e-rep).
|
Really? It seems like there's a simple way to check this - we can search for "spoony", look at the first batch of results - let's say the first page - and see how many of those I replied to in 24 hours. But is there any point? If it turns out you're wrong again, will you just dodge it again and go on to the next accusation, like you've done thus far?
I probably confused you a bit there when I proposed how to check it, because ljbh you do seem rather allergic to evidence; look at your abysmal failure to back up your earlier accusations, look at that healthcare thread where Aircraftkiller kept asking you for citations for what you were saying and you failed just as badly there.
| Quote: |
No and neither does liquid but they're the two biggest e-warriors around because renforums is obviously a place that gives them a sense of comfort and is very important to keep a reputation on.
|
Can you quickly just explain what an "e-warrior" is, and why you aren't one?
| Quote: |
Lol okay? Captain retard comes out of left field. I'm still not seeing where I accused him of manipulation and lies ..
|
Wow, seriously?
On page one you said something which I didn't respond to at the time because I figured you must have been joking. You said talking to me makes you forget what you were talking about. Seriously? On a FORUM, where you can go back and look at what you were talking about any time you like? I didn't think you actually meant that seriously, but now... dude. Think about this. You've already forgotten calling me a liar (which doesn't really surprise me, because you obviously don't think honesty is worth much), and accusing me of underhand debate tactics? Barely two days ago and you've already forgotten? That is worrying.
| Quote: |
I'm just asking if he's ever lost an arguement in his own mind. Should be a simple yes or no answer .. nothing to slit your wrists over.
|
You're right with the last part - because the answer is "who cares?" I certainly don't. Why do you?
| Quote: |
I know you hate to see your god be questioned but I promise its not a tough one. God damn you people are fucking weird. This is such a simple question and you're all acting like I'm accusing him of pedophilia. The fact he keeps dodging and hoping his fan base cover his ass is even funnier than the fact that you cockriders actually attempt to.
|
I don't particularly care whether or not anyone else thinks you're making a fool of yourself too.
edit: as to your fury towards starbuzz, remember what I said a few posts ago. when someone agrees with you against me, it proves you're right; when someone agrees with me against you, there must be something fishy going on
|
Ok so have you ever lost an argument or not?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Sun Apr 28 06:34:14 MST 2024
Total time taken to generate the page: 0.01210 seconds
|
Search
Help
Members
Register
Login
Home
