Command and Conquer: Renegade Official Forums: Spam Fest

Home » General Discussions » Spam Fest » @ Carrier

Show: Today's Messages :: Polls :: Message Navigator

@ Carrier [message #439643]

Tue, 16 November 2010 20:33

R315r4z0r
Messages: 3836
Registered: March 2005
Location: New York

Karma: 0

General (3 Stars)

Quote:

Yay mods that lock threads for failing to meet the minimum standards of spam.

I keep seeing you say this.

What exactly are the minimum standards of spam?

Report message to a moderator

Re: @ Carrier [message #439740 is a reply to message #439643]

Fri, 19 November 2010 09:53

CarrierII
Messages: 3804
Registered: February 2006
Location: England

Karma: 0

General (3 Stars)

R315r4z0r wrote on Wed, 17 November 2010 03:33

Quote:

Yay mods that lock threads for failing to meet the minimum standards of spam.

I keep seeing you say this.

What exactly are the minimum standards of spam?

Let me put it this way, the best spam doesn't exist. Wink

Renguard is a wonderful initiative

Toggle Spoiler

Report message to a moderator

Re: @ Carrier [message #439774 is a reply to message #439740]

Fri, 19 November 2010 22:08

Altzan
Messages: 1586
Registered: September 2008
Location: Tennessee

Karma: 0

General (1 Star)

CarrierII wrote on Fri, 19 November 2010 10:53

R315r4z0r wrote on Wed, 17 November 2010 03:33

Quote:

Yay mods that lock threads for failing to meet the minimum standards of spam.

I keep seeing you say this.

What exactly are the minimum standards of spam?

Let me put it this way, the best spam doesn't exist. Wink

I can tell that answer's not going to cut it for R315r4z0r Razz

I cannot imagine how the clockwork of the universe can exist without a clockmaker. ~Voltaire

Report message to a moderator

Re: @ Carrier [message #439795 is a reply to message #439740]

Sat, 20 November 2010 11:13

sadukar09
Messages: 2812
Registered: May 2007
Location: Ottawa,Canada

Karma: 0

General (2 Stars)

CarrierII wrote on Fri, 19 November 2010 10:53

R315r4z0r wrote on Wed, 17 November 2010 03:33

Quote:

Yay mods that lock threads for failing to meet the minimum standards of spam.

I keep seeing you say this.

What exactly are the minimum standards of spam?

Let me put it this way, the best spam doesn't exist. Wink

http://www.sembeo.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/06/spam.jpg

Quote:

[19:16:48] <APBBR> @ryan3k: THE ENFIELD DEFIES THE LAWS OF PHYSICS BECAUSE THE BULLETS INSTANTLY HIT THEIR TARGETS LOL
[19:16:52] <APBBR> @ryan3k: CHRONO TECHNOLOGY IN TEH BULLETS

Quote:

[22:48]<APBBR> @V0LK0V: AOL COMING UR WAI K
[22:48] <APBBR> Host: Quitting due to Westwood Online connection loss.

Report message to a moderator

Re: @ Carrier [message #439801 is a reply to message #439643]

Sat, 20 November 2010 14:28

slosha
Messages: 1540
Registered: September 2008
Location: North Dakota FTW

Karma: 0

General (1 Star)

I thought we took a vote and the results were that all spam would be allowed.

>:(

The road I cruise is a bitch now, baby.

Report message to a moderator

Re: @ Carrier [message #439847 is a reply to message #439643]

Sun, 21 November 2010 14:36

CarrierII
Messages: 3804
Registered: February 2006
Location: England

Karma: 0

General (3 Stars)

If you want an unrestricted forum, the moderators demand equal unrestriction (within reason, thus you can't post content that violates the rules, and we can't ban you unless you do).

Doesn't mean we can't troll-edit, lock topics, and generally be pests.

Or: "HA! Now you know how it feels!".

Renguard is a wonderful initiative

Toggle Spoiler

Report message to a moderator

Previous Topic:	Funny pictures thread
Next Topic:	HELICOPTERS!!!

Goto Forum:

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Fri May 03 02:36:43 MST 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.01093 seconds