Home » General Discussions » Heated Discussions and Debates » Fanboy Thread #7 - Internet Browser
|
|
| Re: Fanboy Thread #7 - Internet Browser [message #410359 is a reply to message #410342] |
Wed, 11 November 2009 22:48   |
 |
Dover
Messages: 2547
Registered: March 2006
Location: Monterey, California
Karma: 0
|
General (2 Stars) |
|
|
| IAmFenix wrote on Wed, 11 November 2009 17:38 |
| Dover wrote on Tue, 10 November 2009 00:39 |
Google Chrome, because Opera started sucking after Opera 10.
FaggotFox is for people who need 500 plugins to browse the web, or are hipster faggots and are just using it because their hipster faggot friends are.
|
I use Opera because it is faster than Firefox,(what I used before), and that was used because IE was unsecure(what I started using).
Firefox LIED. They are not the fastest!
|
FaggotFox are nowhere near the fastest. It's a fat, bloated browser that eats your RAM for a snack. Opera 10 (The current version as far as I know) might be faster than FaggotFox, but it's sort of hard not to be faster. In any case, Opera 10 isn't as good as Opera 9, and isn't nearly as good as Chrome.
| DarkDemin wrote on Thu, 03 August 2006 19:19 |
Remember kids the internet is serious business.
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Fanboy Thread #7 - Internet Browser [message #410369 is a reply to message #410337] |
Thu, 12 November 2009 02:18 |
 |
JohnDoe
Messages: 1416
Registered: May 2006
Karma: 0
|
General (1 Star) |
|
|
| Saberhawk wrote on Wed, 11 November 2009 18:24 |
Chrome, because it's damn fast while being largely immune to browser-wide crashes and maintains proper operating system integration. Safari might be fast and based off the same layout engine, but using MacOS X widgets and font rendering under Windows is retarded.
|
I've never used it under Windows - I doubt it's as useful (not being able to take advantage of "Preview", widgets) and it's a bit slower.
What I miss in both Chrome and Safari is the universal mouse scroll...I used to literally abuse that feature in Firefox.
lol
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Fanboy Thread #7 - Internet Browser [message #410387 is a reply to message #410383] |
Thu, 12 November 2009 07:37 |
|
JohnDoe
Messages: 1416
Registered: May 2006
Karma: 0
|
General (1 Star) |
|
|
| so say we all. wrote on Thu, 12 November 2009 07:03 |
| JohnDoe wrote on Thu, 12 November 2009 03:18 |
| Saberhawk wrote on Wed, 11 November 2009 18:24 |
Chrome, because it's damn fast while being largely immune to browser-wide crashes and maintains proper operating system integration. Safari might be fast and based off the same layout engine, but using MacOS X widgets and font rendering under Windows is retarded.
|
I've never used it under Windows - I doubt it's as useful (not being able to take advantage of "Preview", widgets) and it's a bit slower.
What I miss in both Chrome and Safari is the universal mouse scroll...I used to literally abuse that feature in Firefox.
|
is universal mouse scroll the one you use by clicking your middle mousebutton? if it is, I can confirm that it is amazingly awesomely important.
|
Ya, I used it at a lot for hands-free reading of threads/wikipedia articles/ebay listings/whatever...no idea why Chrome and Safari don't implement that. Apple might not because of their silly mice, but I have no idea what google is thinking..
lol
|
|
|
|
| Re: Fanboy Thread #7 - Internet Browser [message #410408 is a reply to message #410387] |
Thu, 12 November 2009 15:14 |
|
Dover
Messages: 2547
Registered: March 2006
Location: Monterey, California
Karma: 0
|
General (2 Stars) |
|
|
| JohnDoe wrote on Thu, 12 November 2009 06:37 |
| so say we all. wrote on Thu, 12 November 2009 07:03 |
| JohnDoe wrote on Thu, 12 November 2009 03:18 |
| Saberhawk wrote on Wed, 11 November 2009 18:24 |
Chrome, because it's damn fast while being largely immune to browser-wide crashes and maintains proper operating system integration. Safari might be fast and based off the same layout engine, but using MacOS X widgets and font rendering under Windows is retarded.
|
I've never used it under Windows - I doubt it's as useful (not being able to take advantage of "Preview", widgets) and it's a bit slower.
What I miss in both Chrome and Safari is the universal mouse scroll...I used to literally abuse that feature in Firefox.
|
is universal mouse scroll the one you use by clicking your middle mousebutton? if it is, I can confirm that it is amazingly awesomely important.
|
Ya, I used it at a lot for hands-free reading of threads/wikipedia articles/ebay listings/whatever...no idea why Chrome and Safari don't implement that. Apple might not because of their silly mice, but I have no idea what google is thinking..
|
How strange. I use Chrome, and I use such mouse scrolling all the time.
| DarkDemin wrote on Thu, 03 August 2006 19:19 |
Remember kids the internet is serious business.
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Fanboy Thread #7 - Internet Browser [message #410455 is a reply to message #410408] |
Thu, 12 November 2009 21:22 |
 |
saberhawk
Messages: 1068
Registered: January 2006
Location: ::1
Karma: 0
|
General (1 Star) |
|
|
| Dover wrote on Thu, 12 November 2009 17:14 |
| JohnDoe wrote on Thu, 12 November 2009 06:37 |
| so say we all. wrote on Thu, 12 November 2009 07:03 |
| JohnDoe wrote on Thu, 12 November 2009 03:18 |
| Saberhawk wrote on Wed, 11 November 2009 18:24 |
Chrome, because it's damn fast while being largely immune to browser-wide crashes and maintains proper operating system integration. Safari might be fast and based off the same layout engine, but using MacOS X widgets and font rendering under Windows is retarded.
|
I've never used it under Windows - I doubt it's as useful (not being able to take advantage of "Preview", widgets) and it's a bit slower.
What I miss in both Chrome and Safari is the universal mouse scroll...I used to literally abuse that feature in Firefox.
|
is universal mouse scroll the one you use by clicking your middle mousebutton? if it is, I can confirm that it is amazingly awesomely important.
|
Ya, I used it at a lot for hands-free reading of threads/wikipedia articles/ebay listings/whatever...no idea why Chrome and Safari don't implement that. Apple might not because of their silly mice, but I have no idea what google is thinking..
|
How strange. I use Chrome, and I use such mouse scrolling all the time.
|
I can confirm it works just fine in Chrome 3.0.195.32 *shrug*
|
|
|
|
| Re: Fanboy Thread #7 - Internet Browser [message #410456 is a reply to message #410455] |
Thu, 12 November 2009 21:37 |
|
Dover
Messages: 2547
Registered: March 2006
Location: Monterey, California
Karma: 0
|
General (2 Stars) |
|
|
| Saberhawk wrote on Thu, 12 November 2009 20:22 |
| Dover wrote on Thu, 12 November 2009 17:14 |
| JohnDoe wrote on Thu, 12 November 2009 06:37 |
| so say we all. wrote on Thu, 12 November 2009 07:03 |
| JohnDoe wrote on Thu, 12 November 2009 03:18 |
| Saberhawk wrote on Wed, 11 November 2009 18:24 |
Chrome, because it's damn fast while being largely immune to browser-wide crashes and maintains proper operating system integration. Safari might be fast and based off the same layout engine, but using MacOS X widgets and font rendering under Windows is retarded.
|
I've never used it under Windows - I doubt it's as useful (not being able to take advantage of "Preview", widgets) and it's a bit slower.
What I miss in both Chrome and Safari is the universal mouse scroll...I used to literally abuse that feature in Firefox.
|
is universal mouse scroll the one you use by clicking your middle mousebutton? if it is, I can confirm that it is amazingly awesomely important.
|
Ya, I used it at a lot for hands-free reading of threads/wikipedia articles/ebay listings/whatever...no idea why Chrome and Safari don't implement that. Apple might not because of their silly mice, but I have no idea what google is thinking..
|
How strange. I use Chrome, and I use such mouse scrolling all the time.
|
I can confirm it works just fine in Chrome 3.0.195.32 *shrug*
|
I'm using an older version, apparently; 2.0.172.37, and it still works.
| DarkDemin wrote on Thu, 03 August 2006 19:19 |
Remember kids the internet is serious business.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Fanboy Thread #7 - Internet Browser [message #410469 is a reply to message #410468] |
Fri, 13 November 2009 01:43 |
|
Dover
Messages: 2547
Registered: March 2006
Location: Monterey, California
Karma: 0
|
General (2 Stars) |
|
|
| JohnDoe wrote on Fri, 13 November 2009 00:27 |
gj chrome...guess I would use it if I still had windows. I remember it lacked that feature months after release, so I went back to firefox.
|
I got Chrome like the second week of it's release and haven't really bothered updating since, and I've got the feature. Either you're outright lying on can't figure out how to work the middle mouse button (From all your Mac usage, I'm sure).
| DarkDemin wrote on Thu, 03 August 2006 19:19 |
Remember kids the internet is serious business.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Fanboy Thread #7 - Internet Browser [message #410513 is a reply to message #410507] |
Fri, 13 November 2009 08:58 |
|
Dover
Messages: 2547
Registered: March 2006
Location: Monterey, California
Karma: 0
|
General (2 Stars) |
|
|
| JohnDoe wrote on Fri, 13 November 2009 07:30 |
:'( 1v1?!?!?!?!?
Nope, I was still using Windows back then. I remember others were having the same problem as well on this forum.
|
Link to aforementioned complaints?
| DarkDemin wrote on Thu, 03 August 2006 19:19 |
Remember kids the internet is serious business.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Fanboy Thread #7 - Internet Browser [message #410542 is a reply to message #410539] |
Fri, 13 November 2009 09:47 |
|
Dover
Messages: 2547
Registered: March 2006
Location: Monterey, California
Karma: 0
|
General (2 Stars) |
|
|
| JohnDoe wrote on Fri, 13 November 2009 08:43 |
It's somewhere on my to-do-list.
|
Great. I look forward to it. Till then, shut the fuck up.
| DarkDemin wrote on Thu, 03 August 2006 19:19 |
Remember kids the internet is serious business.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Fanboy Thread #7 - Internet Browser [message #410653 is a reply to message #410056] |
Fri, 13 November 2009 17:15 |
 |
nikki6ixx
Messages: 2545
Registered: August 2007
Karma: 0
|
General (2 Stars) |
|
|
Apparently that 'Chrome OS' is supposed to be out sometime next week in one form or another. However, it sounds like it's only geared for developers.
Still, I'd love to check it out: a dual boot with XP and Chrome for my netbook would be awesome!
Renegade:
| Aircraftkiller wrote on Fri, 10 January 2014 16:56 |
The only game where everyone competes to be an e-janitor.
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Fanboy Thread #7 - Internet Browser [message #410656 is a reply to message #410359] |
Fri, 13 November 2009 17:35 |
 |
IAmFenix
Messages: 447
Registered: October 2007
Karma: 0
|
Commander |
|
|
| Dover wrote on Wed, 11 November 2009 23:48 |
| IAmFenix wrote on Wed, 11 November 2009 17:38 |
| Dover wrote on Tue, 10 November 2009 00:39 |
Google Chrome, because Opera started sucking after Opera 10.
FaggotFox is for people who need 500 plugins to browse the web, or are hipster faggots and are just using it because their hipster faggot friends are.
|
I use Opera because it is faster than Firefox,(what I used before), and that was used because IE was unsecure(what I started using).
Firefox LIED. They are not the fastest!
|
FaggotFox are nowhere near the fastest. It's a fat, bloated browser that eats your RAM for a snack. Opera 10 (The current version as far as I know) might be faster than FaggotFox, but it's sort of hard not to be faster. In any case, Opera 10 isn't as good as Opera 9, and isn't nearly as good as Chrome.
|
lol, I find it funny that awhile after posting my message I was searching on the internet for CoD:MW2 multiplayer titles, got redirected to a fake virus scan site which automatically installed a trojan to my computer.
I WAS using Opera, but now I know better. I will only use Opera on trusted sites(such as this one).
Internet Searching:
Better to be safe & slow than sorry and scanning your entire computer for 20x as long as it would have been to use firefox + all my addons (which are anti-rick roll, ad-block and Stylish [used to turn white pages black for saving ATP and not annoying me], as well as no-scripts and anti-autoplay, are apparently for hipster faggots).
[Updated on: Fri, 13 November 2009 17:35] Report message to a moderator |
|
|
|
| Re: Fanboy Thread #7 - Internet Browser [message #410658 is a reply to message #410656] |
Fri, 13 November 2009 17:42 |
|
Dover
Messages: 2547
Registered: March 2006
Location: Monterey, California
Karma: 0
|
General (2 Stars) |
|
|
| IAmFenix wrote on Fri, 13 November 2009 16:35 |
| Dover wrote on Wed, 11 November 2009 23:48 |
| IAmFenix wrote on Wed, 11 November 2009 17:38 |
| Dover wrote on Tue, 10 November 2009 00:39 |
Google Chrome, because Opera started sucking after Opera 10.
FaggotFox is for people who need 500 plugins to browse the web, or are hipster faggots and are just using it because their hipster faggot friends are.
|
I use Opera because it is faster than Firefox,(what I used before), and that was used because IE was unsecure(what I started using).
Firefox LIED. They are not the fastest!
|
FaggotFox are nowhere near the fastest. It's a fat, bloated browser that eats your RAM for a snack. Opera 10 (The current version as far as I know) might be faster than FaggotFox, but it's sort of hard not to be faster. In any case, Opera 10 isn't as good as Opera 9, and isn't nearly as good as Chrome.
|
lol, I find it funny that awhile after posting my message I was searching on the internet for CoD:MW2 multiplayer titles, got redirected to a fake virus scan site which automatically installed a trojan to my computer.
I WAS using Opera, but now I know better. I will only use Opera on trusted sites(such as this one).
Internet Searching:
Better to be safe & slow than sorry and scanning your entire computer for 20x as long as it would have been to use firefox + all my addons (which are anti-rick roll, ad-block and Stylish [used to turn white pages black for saving ATP and not annoying me], as well as no-scripts and anti-autoplay, are apparently for hipster faggots).
|
We'll see how long you continue to switch off browsers. Chances are it won't last (Although if you keep it up, more power to you). In any case, you're presenting a false choice of either fast or safe, when you can have both with Chrome.
| DarkDemin wrote on Thu, 03 August 2006 19:19 |
Remember kids the internet is serious business.
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Fanboy Thread #7 - Internet Browser [message #410661 is a reply to message #410656] |
Fri, 13 November 2009 17:51 |
|
nikki6ixx
Messages: 2545
Registered: August 2007
Karma: 0
|
General (2 Stars) |
|
|
| IAmFenix wrote on Fri, 13 November 2009 18:35 |
I WAS using Opera, but now I know better. I will only use Opera on trusted sites(such as this one).
|
Then you might as well just run IE...
Or get Chrome, and have it block shit like that automatically meaning you won't have to make compromises!
Renegade:
| Aircraftkiller wrote on Fri, 10 January 2014 16:56 |
The only game where everyone competes to be an e-janitor.
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Fanboy Thread #7 - Internet Browser [message #410671 is a reply to message #410661] |
Fri, 13 November 2009 21:22 |
|
IAmFenix
Messages: 447
Registered: October 2007
Karma: 0
|
Commander |
|
|
| nikki6ixx wrote on Fri, 13 November 2009 18:51 |
| IAmFenix wrote on Fri, 13 November 2009 18:35 |
I WAS using Opera, but now I know better. I will only use Opera on trusted sites(such as this one).
|
Then you might as well just run IE...
Or get Chrome, and have it block shit like that automatically meaning you won't have to make compromises!
|
Might be a good idea...
Haven't tried chrome yet
EDIT:Chrome seems as fast as Opera, if not faster.
[Updated on: Fri, 13 November 2009 21:31] Report message to a moderator |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Mon Apr 29 10:17:06 MST 2024
Total time taken to generate the page: 0.01134 seconds
|
Search
Help
Members
Register
Login
Home
