Renegade Public Forums
C&C: Renegade --> Dying since 2003™, resurrected in 2024!
Home » General Discussions » Heated Discussions and Debates » pawkyfox's Another Thread  () 1 Vote
pawkyfox's Another Thread [message #353988] Fri, 10 October 2008 14:24 Go to next message
Spoony is currently offline  Spoony
Messages: 3915
Registered: January 2006
Karma: 0
General (3 Stars)
Tactics & Strategies Moderator
pawkyfox wrote on Wed, 08 October 2008 21:10

Do you believe in God?
Yes, I am Christian. A prophecy was written and Jesus came and fulfilled the prophecy; it could not have been an accident. I would like to talk more about my beliefs but maybe in another thread.

so... here's the another thread. where to begin?

let's ignore the rather awkward fact that we have no real proof jesus existed at all... take the bible as proof, if you like. so let's look at that proof.

the four gospels, which in any case were written long, long after jesus' supposed death, wildly disagree on every single major event of his life. the virgin birth, jesus' lineage, the 'flight into egypt', the sermon on the mount, judas' betrayal, peter's denial, the crucifixion and the resurrection.

it isn't hard to figure out that the new testament is full of lame attempts to make the original messiah prophecies come out right; there's a very telling sentence in Matthew where he actually says so. "All of this was done, that it might be fulfilled which was spoken by the prophet." this was referring to Jesus' travel into Jerusalem riding an ass, 'prophecied' back in the old testament. another example, Luke makes an ultimately vain attempt to make the whole business take place around the right time by giving three historical references happening at the time of Jesus' birth; the name of the king of Syria, the fact Herod ruled Judea, and the fact Emperor Augustus was running a census at the time. problem is, though, these don't even match up to the right date. nice try, but historically it falls on its face.

moving on the virgin birth itself; read the new testament and please point out a verse for me where jesus says his mother was a virgin, or her apparently having recollection at all of giving birth without first having sex (cos you'd think that was remarkable, wouldn't you...?), or being visited by angels and so on.

and where did the virgin birth take place? bethlehem, right? in John's gospel, people very specifically say how surprised they are that Jesus was not born in Bethlehem like the prophecy said he would be. the other gospels say he was born in bethlehem, but can't agree how his parents got there. again, this is your basis for believing in Christianity?

what else? well, jesus was descended from kings, wasn't he? right back to the line of David? shame the gospels wildly disagree on that too, a massive difference in the number of generations stretching back from Joseph. that's if we're assuming Joseph's lineage means a damn thing, cos I thought he had no part in the conception in any case?

I could go on; the point is obvious. the only 'evidence' for jesus' existence at all (never mind his supposed divinity and ability to redeem and so on) is a book which horribly contradicts itself at every turn, is full of historical wrongness, and quite evidently contains a bunch of usually feeble contortions to make the original prophecies look like they've come true.


Unleash the Renerageâ„¢

Renedrama [ren-i-drah-muh]
- noun
1. the inevitable criticism one receives after doing something awful
Re: pawkyfox's Another Thread [message #353989 is a reply to message #353988] Fri, 10 October 2008 14:29 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Jamie or NuneGa is currently offline  Jamie or NuneGa
Messages: 954
Registered: June 2007
Karma: 0
Colonel
my position on christianity = some people need that belief to help them get through life. Others don't.

http://img504.imageshack.us/img504/8789/avilj4.jpg

Jamie is a guys name in Europe...
Re: pawkyfox's Another Thread [message #353992 is a reply to message #353988] Fri, 10 October 2008 14:31 Go to previous messageGo to next message
cheesesoda is currently offline  cheesesoda
Messages: 6506
Registered: March 2003
Location: Jackson, Michigan
Karma: 0
General (5 Stars)

Actually, there is proof that Jesus existed and that he did consider himself to be the messiah. Problem is, he wasn't the only one, nor was he the only one to actually be crucified for it.

Oh, and you forgot to mention the part where it states, in the gospels (I forget which one, specifically), that Jesus was the only one to ever ascend into Heaven, yet in the Old Testament, Ezekiel is ascended.


[Updated on: Fri, 10 October 2008 14:32]

Report message to a moderator

Re: pawkyfox's Another Thread [message #354015 is a reply to message #353988] Fri, 10 October 2008 20:13 Go to previous messageGo to next message
KIRBY-098 is currently offline  KIRBY-098
Messages: 338
Registered: July 2006
Karma: 0
Recruit
Apparently you've never heard of the Roman historian Josephus.
Re: pawkyfox's Another Thread [message #354016 is a reply to message #353988] Fri, 10 October 2008 20:18 Go to previous messageGo to next message
R315r4z0r is currently offline  R315r4z0r
Messages: 3836
Registered: March 2005
Location: New York
Karma: 0
General (3 Stars)
Actually Jesus did exist and was a major contributer to the spread of Christianity in his time. The fact he actually considered himself as the messiah is a totally separate matter.. but he existed none the less.
Re: pawkyfox's Another Thread [message #354019 is a reply to message #353988] Fri, 10 October 2008 22:06 Go to previous messageGo to next message
NukeIt15 is currently offline  NukeIt15
Messages: 987
Registered: February 2003
Location: Out to lunch
Karma: 0
Colonel
Quote:

Actually Jesus did exist and was a major contributer to the spread of Christianity in his time. The fact he actually considered himself as the messiah is a totally separate matter.. but he existed none the less.


I'd normally not poke my head into somebody else's religion like this, but Jesus could not have contributed to the spread of Christianity in his own time. Certainly, his legacy contributed to the spread of Christianity, but the religion simply didn't exist before Saul of Tarsus (better known as Paul) came along. Until that time, "Christianity" was nothing more nor less than a reformist movement within Judaism. That is what Jesus contributed to the spread of during his lifetime. The fact that his movement took root and later split with Judaism to become its own faith was not the result of any action he took before being crucified.

Whether or not he made any direct contribution after being crucified depends greatly on your sources and beliefs, but it is an incontrovertible fact that there were no Christians while Jesus was alive. His followers and their followers neither called nor considered themselves such until long afterwards.


"Arms discourage and keep the invader and plunderer in awe, and preserve order in the world as well as property. Horrid mischief would ensue were (the law-abiding) deprived of the use of them." - Thomas Paine

Remember, kids: illiteracy is cool. If you took the time to read this, you are clearly a loser who will never get laid. You've been warned.
Re: pawkyfox's Another Thread [message #354033 is a reply to message #353988] Sat, 11 October 2008 02:15 Go to previous messageGo to next message
liquidv2 is currently offline  liquidv2
Messages: 3407
Registered: February 2007
Karma: 0
General (3 Stars)
jesus christ
he might cry when he reads this


liquidv2
Re: pawkyfox's Another Thread [message #354538 is a reply to message #353992] Wed, 15 October 2008 18:21 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Quackpunk is currently offline  Quackpunk
Messages: 128
Registered: March 2006
Karma: 0
Recruit
cheesesoda wrote on Fri, 10 October 2008 16:31

Actually, there is proof that Jesus existed and that he did consider himself to be the messiah. Problem is, he wasn't the only one, nor was he the only one to actually be crucified for it.

Oh, and you forgot to mention the part where it states, in the gospels (I forget which one, specifically), that Jesus was the only one to ever ascend into Heaven, yet in the Old Testament, Ezekiel is ascended.

Jesus ascended into heaven to sit at the right hand of God, and begin his messianic kingdom through active-love. Elijah and Ezekiel (was it Ezekiel?.. I think it was Enoch) both ascended to heaven in physically human form.


Spectator
Re: pawkyfox's Another Thread [message #354596 is a reply to message #353988] Thu, 16 October 2008 06:27 Go to previous messageGo to next message
cheesesoda is currently offline  cheesesoda
Messages: 6506
Registered: March 2003
Location: Jackson, Michigan
Karma: 0
General (5 Stars)

So they all had their physical bodies ascend into heaven. Funny how that doesn't change what I said.

Re: pawkyfox's Another Thread [message #355478 is a reply to message #354596] Wed, 22 October 2008 22:06 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Quackpunk is currently offline  Quackpunk
Messages: 128
Registered: March 2006
Karma: 0
Recruit
cheesesoda wrote on Thu, 16 October 2008 08:27

So they all had their physical bodies ascend into heaven. Funny how that doesn't change what I said.

It is not the physical aspect that the gospel is talking about. It's the spiritual nature of the ascension. I hate when people make this ridiculous arguments against the Bible, and they really have no evidence other than what they read on another I-Hate-Christianity thread.


Spectator
Re: pawkyfox's Another Thread [message #355482 is a reply to message #353988] Wed, 22 October 2008 22:23 Go to previous messageGo to next message
cheesesoda is currently offline  cheesesoda
Messages: 6506
Registered: March 2003
Location: Jackson, Michigan
Karma: 0
General (5 Stars)

Jesus' physical body ascended into Heaven. I went to Catholic elementary and fundamentalist Christian high school. I used to be a Christian until the past few months. Trust me, I am not just pulling shit out of my ass from some random Christian-bashing site.

Re: pawkyfox's Another Thread [message #355557 is a reply to message #353988] Thu, 23 October 2008 15:54 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Quackpunk is currently offline  Quackpunk
Messages: 128
Registered: March 2006
Karma: 0
Recruit
I know his physical body ascended to heaven, but that is not the aspect the gospel is referring to that makes the ascension of Jesus a first. Read my post above. And what made you quit your faith?

Spectator

[Updated on: Thu, 23 October 2008 15:57]

Report message to a moderator

Re: pawkyfox's Another Thread [message #355561 is a reply to message #353988] Thu, 23 October 2008 16:11 Go to previous messageGo to next message
cheesesoda is currently offline  cheesesoda
Messages: 6506
Registered: March 2003
Location: Jackson, Michigan
Karma: 0
General (5 Stars)

How does one's spirit not ascend with their body, though?

As for leaving my faith... the realization that the God that is in the Bible can't possibly exist and be loving, logical, and just. Also, what kind of God would want his creation to ignore the pleasures of the world? Promises of a higher purpose that cannot possibly be proven? Pfft.


[Updated on: Thu, 23 October 2008 19:55]

Report message to a moderator

Re: pawkyfox's Another Thread [message #355580 is a reply to message #353988] Thu, 23 October 2008 19:16 Go to previous messageGo to next message
liquidv2 is currently offline  liquidv2
Messages: 3407
Registered: February 2007
Karma: 0
General (3 Stars)
don't say shit you know they're not going to understand, that's just mean Big Grin

liquidv2
Re: pawkyfox's Another Thread [message #355652 is a reply to message #353988] Fri, 24 October 2008 12:36 Go to previous messageGo to next message
cheesesoda is currently offline  cheesesoda
Messages: 6506
Registered: March 2003
Location: Jackson, Michigan
Karma: 0
General (5 Stars)

To put it another way... in the form of song lyrics...

Sure enough can't figure out
Why all that's good is sin
Why people choose to grovel at
The feet of some dreamed up king

Too scared to fight their own way
So easy to be sheep
Alive but dead inside
Holier than thou

Condemning all around them
They're the chosen ones
Now hypocrisy's king
Defiling everything
And at judgment's hour crumble, yeah
Crumble you mountain of power

Still signs of hope are many
Reason covers ground
Two thousand years of twisted lies
Soon just a burial mound

Too scared to fight their own way
So easy to be sheep
Alive but dead inside
Holier than thou

Condemning all around them
They're the chosen ones
Now hypocrisy's king
Defiling everything
And at judgment's hour crumble, yeah
Crumble you mountain of power

Now hypocrisy's king
Defiling everything
And at judgment's hour crumble, yeah
You mountain of power

Now hypocrisy's king
Defiling everything
And at judgment's hour crumble, yeah
You mountain of power
You mountain of power
Yeah
Mountain of power
Yeah, you mountain of...

I'd like to thank Grand Magus for this beauty of a song. Very Happy


Re: pawkyfox's Another Thread [message #355656 is a reply to message #355561] Fri, 24 October 2008 13:01 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Quackpunk is currently offline  Quackpunk
Messages: 128
Registered: March 2006
Karma: 0
Recruit
cheesesoda wrote on Thu, 23 October 2008 18:11

How does one's spirit not ascend with their body, though?

As for leaving my faith... the realization that the God that is in the Bible can't possibly exist and be loving, logical, and just. Also, what kind of God would want his creation to ignore the pleasures of the world? Promises of a higher purpose that cannot possibly be proven? Pfft.

Pleasures of this world? You mean sin? Sin is present to give man a choice between the temporary pleasure of this world verse the eternal gifts awaiting in heaven (God doesn't want robots following him). Have you ever read Brothers Karamazov, or any article related to the Grand Inquisitor Chapter in the book? God is loving and just, but who he is what he does is by NO means logical. In fact, the love that God displays towards us is of the most irrational sense out there. Trying to prove its existence based on sense and reason will only arouse more confusion and doubt. The only way to grasp this active love and the promise of eternity is by turning to Jesus Christ and his unconditional love.

Mystery is a evident characteristic of God, and if everything concerning him was proven, there would be no drive in people to know more, thus why he chooses to keep his promise, in an essence, unproven.


Spectator
Re: pawkyfox's Another Thread [message #355657 is a reply to message #353988] Fri, 24 October 2008 13:26 Go to previous messageGo to next message
cheesesoda is currently offline  cheesesoda
Messages: 6506
Registered: March 2003
Location: Jackson, Michigan
Karma: 0
General (5 Stars)

It's just hilarious that everything that IS pleasurable is deemed as sin in the Bible. That sounds more like it's nothing more than a way to control the masses. It just fits well with the human psyche that always wants more. Like on a game show, the person can either walk with the $5000 or jeopardize that money for more money or a better prize. Of course, you're going to get people to follow that way.

What love? The fact that he's using us as pawns in a game with Satan over our souls? What about the horrible things he's done to mankind, apparently "His" greatest and most prized creation (ie. Flood, Sodom & Gomorrah, Job, etc...)? "I love my car, so let me hit it with a brick."

Plus, I can't possibly imagine that a just God would allow billions of people to suffer for eternity because they failed to believe in the correct faith. I'm supposed to believe that a collection of books, written by man, is somehow the absolute truth and somehow inerrant, and if I don't, I am damned for eternity? Give me a break.

Either Christians/Muslims/Jews are mistaken about the identity of their Creator or their Creator doesn't exist.


Re: pawkyfox's Another Thread [message #355661 is a reply to message #353988] Fri, 24 October 2008 14:22 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Muad Dib15 is currently offline  Muad Dib15
Messages: 839
Registered: July 2007
Location: behind a computer screen,...
Karma: 0
Colonel

Think of it as training wheels. We say that our God is a loving and caring God. You would probably be a loving and caring parent right?

Think of it this way, Us (the human race) are like a 4 year old on our bike. God would be the parent running along side and helping them. So, would you rather have him continue running along side of you to catch you incase you fall? Yes, but God knows that in order to become a proficient bike rider, we have to learn to ride without having him catch us all the time when we fall. I hope you figure out where I'm going with this, as it was explained better in the book I read.


Re: pawkyfox's Another Thread [message #355669 is a reply to message #353988] Fri, 24 October 2008 15:02 Go to previous messageGo to next message
cheesesoda is currently offline  cheesesoda
Messages: 6506
Registered: March 2003
Location: Jackson, Michigan
Karma: 0
General (5 Stars)

There's a clear difference between letting you fall off of your bike and violently PUSHING you off of the bike.

Re: pawkyfox's Another Thread [message #355672 is a reply to message #353988] Fri, 24 October 2008 15:19 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Ryan3k is currently offline  Ryan3k
Messages: 363
Registered: September 2004
Location: USA
Karma: 0
Commander
I refuse to believe that the zenith of divinity is to create a giant human ant farm with the sole purpose of separating the good from the bad.

Re: pawkyfox's Another Thread [message #355681 is a reply to message #355656] Fri, 24 October 2008 16:45 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Ryu is currently offline  Ryu
Messages: 2833
Registered: September 2006
Location: Liverpool, England.
Karma: 0
General (2 Stars)

Quackpunk wrote on Fri, 24 October 2008 21:01

cheesesoda wrote on Thu, 23 October 2008 18:11

How does one's spirit not ascend with their body, though?

As for leaving my faith... the realization that the God that is in the Bible can't possibly exist and be loving, logical, and just. Also, what kind of God would want his creation to ignore the pleasures of the world? Promises of a higher purpose that cannot possibly be proven? Pfft.

Pleasures of this world? You mean sin? Sin is present to give man a choice between the temporary pleasure of this world verse the eternal gifts awaiting in heaven (God doesn't want robots following him). Have you ever read Brothers Karamazov, or any article related to the Grand Inquisitor Chapter in the book? God is loving and just, but who he is what he does is by NO means logical. In fact, the love that God displays towards us is of the most irrational sense out there. Trying to prove its existence based on sense and reason will only arouse more confusion and doubt. The only way to grasp this active love and the promise of eternity is by turning to Jesus Christ and his unconditional love.

Mystery is a evident characteristic of God, and if everything concerning him was proven, there would be no drive in people to know more, thus why he chooses to keep his promise, in an essence, unproven.



yeah but you only get one life, not fair if we can't experience it how you want to.

Muad Dib15 wrote on Fri, 24 October 2008 22:22

Think of it as training wheels. We say that our God is a loving and caring God. You would probably be a loving and caring parent right?

Think of it this way, Us (the human race) are like a 4 year old on our bike. God would be the parent running along side and helping them. So, would you rather have him continue running along side of you to catch you incase you fall? Yes, but God knows that in order to become a proficient bike rider, we have to learn to ride without having him catch us all the time when we fall. I hope you figure out where I'm going with this, as it was explained better in the book I read.



So you're saying.. if I fall off my bike, I'm fucked? because I sinned but God doesn't come down and give me advice (Advice being a bandage for the fall)..?

flawed if you ask me.


Presence is a curious thing, if you think you need to prove it... you probably never had it in the first place.

[Updated on: Fri, 24 October 2008 16:49]

Report message to a moderator

Re: pawkyfox's Another Thread [message #355683 is a reply to message #355681] Fri, 24 October 2008 16:54 Go to previous messageGo to next message
cheesesoda is currently offline  cheesesoda
Messages: 6506
Registered: March 2003
Location: Jackson, Michigan
Karma: 0
General (5 Stars)

Ryu

So you're saying.. if I fall off my bike, I'm fucked? because I sinned but God doesn't come down and give me advice (Advice being a bandage for the fall)..?

flawed if you ask me.

No, that's not what he's saying. He's saying God lets bad things happen, so we learn. However, he didn't really address what I brought up. I was talking about where God actually participated rather than let it happen.


Re: pawkyfox's Another Thread [message #355686 is a reply to message #355683] Fri, 24 October 2008 16:57 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Ryu is currently offline  Ryu
Messages: 2833
Registered: September 2006
Location: Liverpool, England.
Karma: 0
General (2 Stars)

cheesesoda wrote on Sat, 25 October 2008 00:54

Ryu

So you're saying.. if I fall off my bike, I'm fucked? because I sinned but God doesn't come down and give me advice (Advice being a bandage for the fall)..?

flawed if you ask me.

No, that's not what he's saying. He's saying God lets bad things happen, so we learn. However, he didn't really address what I brought up. I was talking about where God actually participated rather than let it happen.


ahuh.. better wording is needed if you ask me.

ugh I hate religious topics, brb moving topic.


Presence is a curious thing, if you think you need to prove it... you probably never had it in the first place.
Re: pawkyfox's Another Thread [message #355758 is a reply to message #353988] Sat, 25 October 2008 12:04 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Muad Dib15 is currently offline  Muad Dib15
Messages: 839
Registered: July 2007
Location: behind a computer screen,...
Karma: 0
Colonel

As I said before, it was explained better in the book Angels and Demons, which is written by the guy who wrote The Davinci Code and is the book before it.

Re: pawkyfox's Another Thread [message #355938 is a reply to message #355657] Sun, 26 October 2008 23:20 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
Quackpunk is currently offline  Quackpunk
Messages: 128
Registered: March 2006
Karma: 0
Recruit
cheesesoda wrote on Fri, 24 October 2008 15:26

It's just hilarious that everything that IS pleasurable is deemed as sin in the Bible. That sounds more like it's nothing more than a way to control the masses. It just fits well with the human psyche that always wants more. Like on a game show, the person can either walk with the $5000 or jeopardize that money for more money or a better prize. Of course, you're going to get people to follow that way.

What love? The fact that he's using us as pawns in a game with Satan over our souls? What about the horrible things he's done to mankind, apparently "His" greatest and most prized creation (ie. Flood, Sodom & Gomorrah, Job, etc...)? "I love my car, so let me hit it with a brick."

Plus, I can't possibly imagine that a just God would allow billions of people to suffer for eternity because they failed to believe in the correct faith. I'm supposed to believe that a collection of books, written by man, is somehow the absolute truth and somehow inerrant, and if I don't, I am damned for eternity? Give me a break.

Either Christians/Muslims/Jews are mistaken about the identity of their Creator or their Creator doesn't exist.

God does not commit evil on man, the enemy does. Everyone is in a spiritual war. And the Bible says, one way or another, every man and woman has had the opportunity to accept faith of Jesus Christ, just like you have had yours.
When you say pleasures of this world do you mean sex, alcohol, and drugs, etc..? God designed sex, and he wants man to have sex, but with only one other human (your wife) of the opposite gender. Hence when people have sex with multiple humans, disease spreads and people's lives are screwed up, simply because God did not design sex to operate that way. As for alcohol and drugs, etc.., what pleasurable outcome do they result in? Sure you can live in the moment for a while, but even by earthly standards, they are destructive and life ruining
The Bible is absolute truth, it is also infallible, but I do not believe it is inerrant. I believe the human authors have made mistakes, but these mistakes do not contradict the ultimate message that God is trying to get across.
If we are meant to be controlled pawns, than why didn't God create robots? Why would he instill free choice? Have you read the story of the flood, or Soddom and Gomorrah? These people had no spiritual guidance or discernment, so God's wrath was thrown upon them. Man is not designed to sin, man is designed to worship God, and when man refuses to do so, he is bestowing punishment on himself.


Spectator
Previous Topic: Do You Like E.A. Games?. I Think.
Next Topic: Obama News
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Sun May 05 10:49:10 MST 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.01079 seconds