| Re: the anti cheat thing [message #337788 is a reply to message #337786] |
Sat, 28 June 2008 00:36   |
_SSnipe_
Messages: 4121
Registered: May 2007
Location: Riverside Southern Califo...
Karma: 0
|
General (4 Stars) |
|
|
| Goztow wrote on Sat, 28 June 2008 00:17 |
| SSnipe wrote on Sat, 28 June 2008 03:39 |
all i know is 4 times i changed damage to my servs objects file and when i join to test it i got banned for damage hacks so did many others
|
You are beyong hope, or else you just ignored all our posts.
|
sorry but you guys mean i have to change damage client side aswell?
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: the anti cheat thing [message #337793 is a reply to message #337527] |
Sat, 28 June 2008 02:08 |
a000clown
Messages: 363
Registered: May 2005
Location: Canada
Karma: 0
|
Commander |
|
|
I think I may have phrased it wrong or I just don't know what I'm talking about lol
I understand what you said about how BIATCH works and I now know modifying damage values server-side is bad, but we also have the same problem when we add new weapons presets because the client doesn't have them; thus, false positives because of the reasons you explained.
Since the .exe is being replaced for all clients I guess I was hoping this could somehow be fixed or worked around.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: the anti cheat thing [message #337845 is a reply to message #337842] |
Sat, 28 June 2008 10:19 |
_SSnipe_
Messages: 4121
Registered: May 2007
Location: Riverside Southern Califo...
Karma: 0
|
General (4 Stars) |
|
|
| EvilWhiteDragon wrote on Sat, 28 June 2008 09:55 |
You got the idea SSnipe.
Everyone would need the modded objects file. With or without BIATCH, only modding the serverside one is useles.
|
ok thats easier for me to understand  thanks i guess i wont be changing damage lol
|
|
|
|
Search
Help
Members
Register
Login
Home
