| FOX News ... [message #109906] |
Tue, 24 August 2004 17:22   |
 |
SuperFlyingEngi
Messages: 1756
Registered: November 2003
Karma: 0
|
General (1 Star) |
|
|
| cowmisfit |
lol, no no no, he's cutting off morons who go off subject and dodge questions, no dodging questions number 1 rule in the no spin zone 
|
Ok, if dodging questions counts as answering them in a logical way, I can see where you're coming from. When someone is throwing stuff in Bill O' Reilly's face [Side note: You know that "57% of all statistics are made up on the spot" thing? Well, most of 'em came from Bill 'O Lielly.] he starts shouting them down, and won't even let them speak. Then he just cuts them off. It's not then they go off topic, it's when they stay on topic that it bothers O'Lielly.
"To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public." -- Theodore Roosevelt (1918)
"The danger to political dissent is acute where the Government attempts to act under so vague a concept as the power to protect "domestic security." Given the difficulty of defining the domestic security interest, the danger of abuse in acting to protect that interest becomes apparent. --U.S. Supreme Court decision (407 U.S. 297 (1972)
The Liberal Media At Work
An objective look at media partisanship
|
|
|
|
|
|
| FOX News ... [message #109910] |
Tue, 24 August 2004 17:32 |
|
SuperFlyingEngi
Messages: 1756
Registered: November 2003
Karma: 0
|
General (1 Star) |
|
|
http://www.commondreams.org/views03/0318-11.htm
Just one example. There are a lot of them.
"To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public." -- Theodore Roosevelt (1918)
"The danger to political dissent is acute where the Government attempts to act under so vague a concept as the power to protect "domestic security." Given the difficulty of defining the domestic security interest, the danger of abuse in acting to protect that interest becomes apparent. --U.S. Supreme Court decision (407 U.S. 297 (1972)
The Liberal Media At Work
An objective look at media partisanship
|
|
|
|
|
|
| FOX News ... [message #109916] |
Tue, 24 August 2004 17:44 |
|
SuperFlyingEngi
Messages: 1756
Registered: November 2003
Karma: 0
|
General (1 Star) |
|
|
No, but you can't find audio for most Bill O' Reilly shows, and the transcript just doesn't do him justice.
However, read this: http://www.jimgilliam.com/2004/08/krugman_vs_oreilly_full_transcript.php
If you saw the show on Meet the Press somewhere other than FOX News, you would have seen the whole thing, and seen O'Reilly be destroyed. But the transcript is almost as good.
"To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public." -- Theodore Roosevelt (1918)
"The danger to political dissent is acute where the Government attempts to act under so vague a concept as the power to protect "domestic security." Given the difficulty of defining the domestic security interest, the danger of abuse in acting to protect that interest becomes apparent. --U.S. Supreme Court decision (407 U.S. 297 (1972)
The Liberal Media At Work
An objective look at media partisanship
|
|
|
|
|
|
| FOX News ... [message #109927] |
Tue, 24 August 2004 18:55 |
|
SuperFlyingEngi
Messages: 1756
Registered: November 2003
Karma: 0
|
General (1 Star) |
|
|
Just like you.
"To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public." -- Theodore Roosevelt (1918)
"The danger to political dissent is acute where the Government attempts to act under so vague a concept as the power to protect "domestic security." Given the difficulty of defining the domestic security interest, the danger of abuse in acting to protect that interest becomes apparent. --U.S. Supreme Court decision (407 U.S. 297 (1972)
The Liberal Media At Work
An objective look at media partisanship
|
|
|
|
Search
Help
Members
Register
Login
Home
