| Good site for those of you against mindless slaughter [message #7948] |
Wed, 19 March 2003 18:32   |
KIRBY098
Messages: 1546
Registered: February 2003
Karma: 0
|
General (1 Star) |
|
|
| Duke of Nukes |
Clinton did nothing worthy of being kicked out of office...and people knew that. Clinton was never in any danger. So long as he stays fit to run the office, he could not have been convicted. Was Clinton going off on every little thing threatening to bomb everyone? no...and unless he started doing stuff that showed him as an irresponsible leader, he would not have been kicked out of office
Nothing you can say can convince me that Clinton wasn't fit to run the country...notice how there was good economy while he was in office...
|
Spoken like a true , NEA spoon fed, democrat wannabee. Think for yourself, don't just spout off what your teachers tell you. You are starting to sound like a broken record.
Deleted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Good site for those of you against mindless slaughter [message #8006] |
Wed, 19 March 2003 20:37 |
KIRBY098
Messages: 1546
Registered: February 2003
Karma: 0
|
General (1 Star) |
|
|
| Duke of Nukes |
that's not how stuff works in my school district...There's a reason why it's one of the top 5 public school districts in the nation...and it's not due to spreading any kind of war propaganda...for or against it.
|
Judging by how well educated you are, the fact that you think South Vietnam still exists, and the poor debating, and aimless rantings, I won't take your word for it, mmmkk? :rolleyes:
Deleted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Good site for those of you against mindless slaughter [message #8140] |
Thu, 20 March 2003 07:47 |
spotelmo
Messages: 273
Registered: February 2003
Location: nebraska
Karma: 0
|
Recruit |
|
|
| Duke of Nukes |
Clinton did nothing worthy of being kicked out of office...and people knew that. Clinton was never in any danger. So long as he stays fit to run the office, he could not have been convicted. Was Clinton going off on every little thing threatening to bomb everyone? no...and unless he started doing stuff that showed him as an irresponsible leader, he would not have been kicked out of office
Nothing you can say can convince me that Clinton wasn't fit to run the country...notice how there was good economy while he was in office...
|
perjury, obstruction of justice are both crimes which the president was guilty of. they are good reasons to be convicted. the circumstances under which he was guilty of those are not important. he cost this country millions of dollars and jeopardized a civilian's legitimate court case against him due to his actions.
as for the economy, that was due to reagan tax cuts in the 80's which allowed businesses to invest in new technologies(internet, e commerce etc.) the economy was a direct result of bill gates, not bill clinton. interesting how microsoft was pretty much singlehandedly responsible for the great economy by making the computer and internet such popular world wide items and yet the clinton justice department saw fit to punish microsoft with anti trust lawsuits.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Good site for those of you against mindless slaughter [message #8150] |
Thu, 20 March 2003 09:28 |
 |
Crimson
Messages: 7427
Registered: February 2003
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Karma: 0
|
General (5 Stars)
ADMINISTRATOR |
|
|
Don't EVEN get started on Clinton. That man was a fucking bastard who is unfit to run a family, let alone a country. Duke of Nukes sounds SO "spoon-fed" it's not even funny.
My dad spent over a year compiling facts (yes, facts) on Clinton. If you read what he'd compiled... you'd wonder how he lasted 8 years in office, too.
I'm the bawss.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Good site for those of you against mindless slaughter [message #8199] |
Thu, 20 March 2003 11:28 |
Carl
Messages: 165
Registered: March 2003
Location: Washington, US
Karma: 0
|
Recruit |
|
|
| [sg |
the0ne]| Carl |
| Aircraftkiller |
Iraq hasn't done anything, right? That's why they've defied the United Nations for twelve years?
|
Yea, well we never really decided that the UN could rule the world now did we?
|
No but after the U.N./Allied forces *handed* Saddam his ass in the Gulf War he kinda had to agree to play ball by OUR rules. Or at least that was what was supose to happen.
|
Correction. 99% of those forces were US. UN troops never wen't in until AFTER. and they never have. Look at the US rangers in 98. UN troops didn't go in until AFTER those guys were already out.
y0
http://www.dead6.net
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Good site for those of you against mindless slaughter [message #8265] |
Thu, 20 March 2003 14:50 |
 |
K9Trooper
Messages: 821
Registered: February 2003
Karma: 0
|
Colonel |
|
|
| Carl |
| [sg |
the0ne]| Carl |
| Aircraftkiller |
Iraq hasn't done anything, right? That's why they've defied the United Nations for twelve years?
|
Yea, well we never really decided that the UN could rule the world now did we?
|
No but after the U.N./Allied forces *handed* Saddam his ass in the Gulf War he kinda had to agree to play ball by OUR rules. Or at least that was what was supose to happen.
|
Correction. 99% of those forces were US. UN troops never wen't in until AFTER. and they never have. Look at the US rangers in 98. UN troops didn't go in until AFTER those guys were already out.
|
Ummm. wrong on the 99%. That would mean that there were ony 200 Arabic troops. Get your facts right. The US/British troops were about 65-70%. Notice that I said US/British.
| Quote: |
carl: Yea, well we never really decided that the UN could rule the world now did we?
|
Then why do they try to rule what the US can do or not do?
R.I.P. TreyD. You will be missed, but not forgotten.
|
|
|
|
Search
Help
Members
Register
Login
Home
