Renegade Public Forums
C&C: Renegade --> Dying since 2003™, resurrected in 2024!
Home » General Discussions » General Discussion » SC2
Re: SC2 [message #388871 is a reply to message #388020] Mon, 01 June 2009 21:25 Go to previous messageGo to next message
zeratul is currently offline  zeratul
Messages: 1715
Registered: January 2009
Location: Texas
Karma: -1
General (1 Star)
He be correct no one even cares anymore

Re: SC2 [message #397141 is a reply to message #387403] Wed, 05 August 2009 18:02 Go to previous messageGo to next message
nikki6ixx is currently offline  nikki6ixx
Messages: 2545
Registered: August 2007
Karma: 0
General (2 Stars)
http://www.techspot.com/news/35729-starcraft-2-release-pushed-back-until-2010.ht ml

lol.

And I still don't understand how on Earth they're getting away with releasing each campaign separately. I have no interest in the game myself, but if I was a fan, I wouldn't stand for it at all.


Renegade:
Aircraftkiller wrote on Fri, 10 January 2014 16:56

The only game where everyone competes to be an e-janitor.
Re: SC2 [message #397142 is a reply to message #387403] Wed, 05 August 2009 18:13 Go to previous messageGo to next message
kill is currently offline  kill
Messages: 190
Registered: January 2009
Karma: 0
Recruit
any1 know when it comes out

http://i283.photobucket.com/albums/kk307/100ivan/siggy.png
Re: SC2 [message #397582 is a reply to message #397142] Tue, 11 August 2009 07:44 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Dover is currently offline  Dover
Messages: 2547
Registered: March 2006
Location: Monterey, California
Karma: 0
General (2 Stars)
kill wrote on Wed, 05 August 2009 18:13

any1 know when it comes out


I pre-ordered a few days after the annoucement came, and the date then was 10/1/08.

So...uh...about ten months ago.


DarkDemin wrote on Thu, 03 August 2006 19:19

Remember kids the internet is serious business.
Re: SC2 [message #398603 is a reply to message #397582] Wed, 19 August 2009 20:54 Go to previous messageGo to next message
zeratul is currently offline  zeratul
Messages: 1715
Registered: January 2009
Location: Texas
Karma: -1
General (1 Star)
Dover wrote on Tue, 11 August 2009 09:44

kill wrote on Wed, 05 August 2009 18:13

any1 know when it comes out


I pre-ordered a few days after the annoucement came, and the date then was 10/1/08.

So...uh...about ten months ago.

Laughing


Re: SC2 [message #398724 is a reply to message #387970] Thu, 20 August 2009 17:52 Go to previous messageGo to next message
GEORGE ZIMMER is currently offline  GEORGE ZIMMER
Messages: 2605
Registered: March 2006
Karma: 0
General (2 Stars)
Zeratul wrote on Tue, 26 May 2009 11:12

Well ea games keeps ruining and cancelling good games and people jsut look for reasons to complain about them... Blizzard on the other hand are completly awesome and are practicly worshiped... kinda liek Bungie

Yeah, thank GOD for them releasing Starcraft: Ghost, never delaying Starcraft II on account of World of Warcraft, and releasing Diablo III on a timely manner

oh wait


Toggle Spoiler
Re: SC2 [message #398727 is a reply to message #398724] Thu, 20 August 2009 18:07 Go to previous messageGo to next message
nikki6ixx is currently offline  nikki6ixx
Messages: 2545
Registered: August 2007
Karma: 0
General (2 Stars)
GEORGE ZIMMER wrote on Thu, 20 August 2009 19:52

Zeratul wrote on Tue, 26 May 2009 11:12

Well ea games keeps ruining and cancelling good games and people jsut look for reasons to complain about them... Blizzard on the other hand are completly awesome and are practicly worshiped... kinda liek Bungie

Yeah, thank GOD for them releasing Starcraft: Ghost, never delaying Starcraft II on account of World of Warcraft, and releasing Diablo III on a timely manner

oh wait


Not to mention that they'll likely be charging maybe 40 bucks a pop for each single player expansion making SC2 an investment of at least one hundred-twenty plus bucks, as well as suspending LAN play.

If EA did what Blizzard is doing with SC2, they'd have fucking Molotov's thrown through their window's, but hey, since it's Blizzard, people will shill out tons of money!!


Renegade:
Aircraftkiller wrote on Fri, 10 January 2014 16:56

The only game where everyone competes to be an e-janitor.

[Updated on: Thu, 20 August 2009 18:08]

Report message to a moderator

Re: SC2 [message #398879 is a reply to message #398727] Fri, 21 August 2009 17:20 Go to previous messageGo to next message
zeratul is currently offline  zeratul
Messages: 1715
Registered: January 2009
Location: Texas
Karma: -1
General (1 Star)
nikki6ixx wrote on Thu, 20 August 2009 20:07

GEORGE ZIMMER wrote on Thu, 20 August 2009 19:52

Zeratul wrote on Tue, 26 May 2009 11:12

Well ea games keeps ruining and cancelling good games and people jsut look for reasons to complain about them... Blizzard on the other hand are completly awesome and are practicly worshiped... kinda liek Bungie

Yeah, thank GOD for them releasing Starcraft: Ghost, never delaying Starcraft II on account of World of Warcraft, and releasing Diablo III on a timely manner

oh wait


Not to mention that they'll likely be charging maybe 40 bucks a pop for each single player expansion making SC2 an investment of at least one hundred-twenty plus bucks, as well as suspending LAN play.

If EA did what Blizzard is doing with SC2, they'd have fucking Molotov's thrown through their window's, but hey, since it's Blizzard, people will shill out tons of money!!


Exactly thats the beauty of it... Sarcasm


Re: SC2 [message #398882 is a reply to message #387403] Fri, 21 August 2009 17:26 Go to previous messageGo to next message
R315r4z0r is currently offline  R315r4z0r
Messages: 3836
Registered: March 2005
Location: New York
Karma: 0
General (3 Stars)
The thing with EA is that they had the wrong idea about games.

They bought and bought and bought out countless game companies and took over the rights to their games because they thought it would be profitable. But now they are stuck with hundreds of titles with thousands of fans in each that they have to appease.

They have so many things to do, so many people to attend to and make happy, that they don't have the time to sit down and polish their games as much as other companies... it would only cause them to lose money.
Re: SC2 [message #399199 is a reply to message #398882] Sun, 23 August 2009 09:41 Go to previous messageGo to next message
zeratul is currently offline  zeratul
Messages: 1715
Registered: January 2009
Location: Texas
Karma: -1
General (1 Star)
greedy basterds

Re: SC2 [message #399203 is a reply to message #387403] Sun, 23 August 2009 09:55 Go to previous messageGo to next message
R315r4z0r is currently offline  R315r4z0r
Messages: 3836
Registered: March 2005
Location: New York
Karma: 0
General (3 Stars)
Not necessarily, without money, they can't use more expensive tools to make the games with the current amount of quality they have.

If they spend too much money on one thing, other games will suffer.

The best thing they can do now is sell off rights to many of their games or franchises. The less games they own, the more quality can be put into others.
Re: SC2 [message #400467 is a reply to message #399203] Fri, 28 August 2009 15:20 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Dante
Messages: 1039
Registered: February 2003
Karma: 0
General (1 Star)
Blizzard's core motto is to make the most epic gaming experience ever, thus if they have to delay a game because of quality or game play they don't like, they will.

I for one am looking forward to SC2, as well as D3, especially after playing them at BlizzCon.


[Updated on: Fri, 28 August 2009 15:21]

Report message to a moderator

Re: SC2 [message #400608 is a reply to message #388020] Sat, 29 August 2009 10:22 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Kimb is currently offline  Kimb
Messages: 607
Registered: August 2009
Location: There is no greater power...
Karma: 0
Colonel

all i have to say is Diablo III Thumbs Up

What we think, or what we know, or what we believe is, in the end, of little consequence. The only consequence is what we do.
CarrierII wrote on Fri 21 May 2010 06:58

This doesn't meet the minimum standards of spam.
Re: SC2 [message #400727 is a reply to message #387403] Sat, 29 August 2009 21:19 Go to previous messageGo to next message
QoQFrost is currently offline  QoQFrost
Messages: 10
Registered: July 2007
Karma: 0
Recruit
Starcraft II will be the new DNF
Re: SC2 [message #400794 is a reply to message #400727] Sun, 30 August 2009 07:00 Go to previous messageGo to next message
cmatt42 is currently offline  cmatt42
Messages: 2057
Registered: July 2004
Karma: 0
General (2 Stars)
QoQFrost wrote on Sat, 29 August 2009 23:19

Starcraft II will be the new DNF

How? We have a target time window.


[Updated on: Sun, 30 August 2009 07:00]

Report message to a moderator

Re: SC2 [message #410189 is a reply to message #387403] Tue, 10 November 2009 21:11 Go to previous messageGo to next message
nikki6ixx is currently offline  nikki6ixx
Messages: 2545
Registered: August 2007
Karma: 0
General (2 Stars)
http://www.techspot.com/news/36894-blizzard-delays-starcraft-ii-beta-until-2010. html

HA

HA

HAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!!


Renegade:
Aircraftkiller wrote on Fri, 10 January 2014 16:56

The only game where everyone competes to be an e-janitor.
Re: SC2 [message #410192 is a reply to message #410189] Tue, 10 November 2009 22:48 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Dover is currently offline  Dover
Messages: 2547
Registered: March 2006
Location: Monterey, California
Karma: 0
General (2 Stars)
nikki6ixx wrote on Tue, 10 November 2009 20:11

http://www.techspot.com/news/36894-blizzard-delays-starcraft-ii-beta-until-2010. html

HA

HA

HAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!!


I've come to peace with this, although I may or may not have shed a tear or two. Huh


DarkDemin wrote on Thu, 03 August 2006 19:19

Remember kids the internet is serious business.
Re: SC2 [message #410306 is a reply to message #387403] Wed, 11 November 2009 15:22 Go to previous messageGo to next message
RoCk2Star is currently offline  RoCk2Star
Messages: 141
Registered: July 2009
Karma: 0
Recruit
Sim City 2, ok.
Re: SC2 [message #410310 is a reply to message #410306] Wed, 11 November 2009 15:31 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Dover is currently offline  Dover
Messages: 2547
Registered: March 2006
Location: Monterey, California
Karma: 0
General (2 Stars)
RoCk2Star wrote on Wed, 11 November 2009 14:22

Sim City 2, ok.


Faggot.


DarkDemin wrote on Thu, 03 August 2006 19:19

Remember kids the internet is serious business.
Re: SC2 [message #410325 is a reply to message #387403] Wed, 11 November 2009 16:34 Go to previous messageGo to next message
GEORGE ZIMMER is currently offline  GEORGE ZIMMER
Messages: 2605
Registered: March 2006
Karma: 0
General (2 Stars)
IN OTHER NEWS WORLD OF WARCRAFT IS GOING TO BE UPDATED

ENTIRELY UNRELATED THOUGH, GUYS


Toggle Spoiler
Re: SC2 [message #410333 is a reply to message #387403] Wed, 11 November 2009 17:09 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Altzan is currently offline  Altzan
Messages: 1586
Registered: September 2008
Location: Tennessee
Karma: 0
General (1 Star)
I wish this thread was about Star Control II Sad

I cannot imagine how the clockwork of the universe can exist without a clockmaker. ~Voltaire
Re: SC2 [message #410502 is a reply to message #410310] Fri, 13 November 2009 08:24 Go to previous messageGo to next message
RoCk2Star is currently offline  RoCk2Star
Messages: 141
Registered: July 2009
Karma: 0
Recruit
Dover wrote on Wed, 11 November 2009 23:31

RoCk2Star wrote on Wed, 11 November 2009 14:22

Sim City 2, ok.


Faggot.


Overused, try harder bro !
Re: SC2 [message #410521 is a reply to message #387403] Fri, 13 November 2009 09:09 Go to previous messageGo to next message
GEORGE ZIMMER is currently offline  GEORGE ZIMMER
Messages: 2605
Registered: March 2006
Karma: 0
General (2 Stars)
I actually kinda wish they WOULD make more Sim City games, but they went down the same road as C&C did :[

Toggle Spoiler
Re: SC2 [message #410528 is a reply to message #410521] Fri, 13 November 2009 09:22 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Dover is currently offline  Dover
Messages: 2547
Registered: March 2006
Location: Monterey, California
Karma: 0
General (2 Stars)
GEORGE ZIMMER wrote on Fri, 13 November 2009 08:09

I actually kinda wish they WOULD make more Sim City games, but they went down the same road as C&C did :[


Sim City 4 really pretty good. It's only limiting factor was sometimes things like traffic calculation would get screwy, but that's more to keep CPU usage reasonable than anything else.


DarkDemin wrote on Thu, 03 August 2006 19:19

Remember kids the internet is serious business.
Re: SC2 [message #410566 is a reply to message #410528] Fri, 13 November 2009 10:54 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
nikki6ixx is currently offline  nikki6ixx
Messages: 2545
Registered: August 2007
Karma: 0
General (2 Stars)
Dover wrote on Fri, 13 November 2009 10:22

GEORGE ZIMMER wrote on Fri, 13 November 2009 08:09

I actually kinda wish they WOULD make more Sim City games, but they went down the same road as C&C did :[


Sim City 4 really pretty good. It's only limiting factor was sometimes things like traffic calculation would get screwy, but that's more to keep CPU usage reasonable than anything else.


There was a huge patch done by a group of volunteers that fixed many of the traffic routing problems.

However, SimCity 4 kinda sucked because it required so much micr-management that I didn't have the patience for. Sad


Renegade:
Aircraftkiller wrote on Fri, 10 January 2014 16:56

The only game where everyone competes to be an e-janitor.
Previous Topic: Promotional Video
Next Topic: msn?
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Tue May 07 21:02:37 MST 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.01138 seconds