|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Best Article EVAR! [message #359605 is a reply to message #359590] |
Sun, 23 November 2008 20:34   |
 |
nikki6ixx
Messages: 2545
Registered: August 2007
Karma: 0
|
General (2 Stars) |
|
|
Who came first? The Chicken or the ...
Renegade:
| Aircraftkiller wrote on Fri, 10 January 2014 16:56 |
The only game where everyone competes to be an e-janitor.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Best Article EVAR! [message #359611 is a reply to message #359602] |
Sun, 23 November 2008 21:36 |
 |
cmatt42
Messages: 2057
Registered: July 2004
Karma: 0
|
General (2 Stars) |
|
|
| R315r4z0r wrote on Sun, 23 November 2008 21:25 |
It's one thing to actually DO it but to view it?! Doesn't that go against the constitution or some law or something?
|
I guess it's kind of "supporting" it in a way, which can be about as bad as the actual act.
GunKataGaming.net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Best Article EVAR! [message #359649 is a reply to message #359592] |
Mon, 24 November 2008 04:38 |
 |
Goztow
Messages: 9727
Registered: March 2005
Location: Belgium
Karma: 13
|
General (5 Stars)
Goztoe |
|
|
| SSnipe wrote on Mon, 24 November 2008 01:45 |
That poor poor chicken..........
|
I have to agree with this.
You can find me in The KOSs2 (TK2) discord while I'm playing. Feel free to come and say hi! TK2 discord
|
|
|
|
| Re: Best Article EVAR! [message #359655 is a reply to message #359590] |
Mon, 24 November 2008 04:48 |
 |
luv2pb
Messages: 1488
Registered: February 2004
Karma: 0
|
General (1 Star)
Not everything is as it appears
Untouchable |
|
|
I'm outraged by this! How's a chicken supposed to get his game on these days?!? Chickens need lovin too 'ya know.
N00bstories Director Of Operations
|
|
|
|
| Re: Best Article EVAR! [message #359783 is a reply to message #359634] |
Mon, 24 November 2008 21:30 |
 |
R315r4z0r
Messages: 3836
Registered: March 2005
Location: New York
Karma: 0
|
General (3 Stars) |
|
|
| djlaptop wrote on Mon, 24 November 2008 04:22 |
By viewing it you're helping to propagate the demand for such content. And as long as there's demand, horrible people will do horrible things to create a supply to meet that demand.
|
Understandable but besides the point, none the less.
If someone out there enjoys such.. strange.. things, they should have to ability and the approval to stimulate that joy as long as he/she isn't physically and directly involved in the crime.
Seriously, if it's a crime to look at animal porn or child porn or what be it, then it should also be a crime to play violent, murderous games, watch movies that involve killing innocent people, reading books about the mafia, or listen to music that talks about raping women...
[Updated on: Mon, 24 November 2008 21:31] Report message to a moderator |
|
|
|
| Re: Best Article EVAR! [message #359813 is a reply to message #359783] |
Tue, 25 November 2008 06:54 |
 |
Starbuzzz
Messages: 1637
Registered: June 2008
Karma: 0
|
General (1 Star) |
|
|
R3, I am sick of your liberalism. You don't get it do you? Child porn requires REAL children to perfom the hideous acts. Think man.
---
About the article, I grinned at the sicko's turmoils at the hands of the government.
[Updated on: Tue, 25 November 2008 07:01] Report message to a moderator |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Best Article EVAR! [message #359831 is a reply to message #359813] |
Tue, 25 November 2008 10:33 |
|
|
| pawkyfox wrote on Tue, 25 November 2008 08:54 |
R3, I am sick of your liberalism. You don't get it do you? Child porn requires REAL children to perfom the hideous acts. Think man.
|
No, you don't get it. All he's saying is that he doesn't see why the viewer should be punished for an act that does NOT affect anyone else but him. Murder is illegal, but there are surveillance videos of people murdering others. Should watching these videos be illegal as it perpetuates a demand for such videos? Yes, I realize that the purpose of child porn and surveillance videos are distinctly different, but the act (not purpose) of watching said videos isn't.
While, I do agree that watching such videos is essentially condoning the act, it is still not COMMITTING the act. I would argue that the viewer of child pornography is just as fucked up as the person creating it, but the actions are what separate it from being a crime and an immoral perversion.
Libertarian Party | The King's Throne | The Soda Shop
[Updated on: Wed, 26 November 2008 07:30] Report message to a moderator |
|
|
|
| Re: Best Article EVAR! [message #359885 is a reply to message #359828] |
Tue, 25 November 2008 14:51 |
|
nikki6ixx
Messages: 2545
Registered: August 2007
Karma: 0
|
General (2 Stars) |
|
|
| Ryu wrote on Tue, 25 November 2008 11:00 |
| Ma1kel wrote on Tue, 25 November 2008 15:35 |
Wait he got convicted for fucking a chicken, a chicken? Why is that even illigal.
|
well I don't want to eat a chicken that some guy spunked in... do you?
|
That's one thing that confuses me... why didn't he fry it up? He obviously battered it.
Renegade:
| Aircraftkiller wrote on Fri, 10 January 2014 16:56 |
The only game where everyone competes to be an e-janitor.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Best Article EVAR! [message #359959 is a reply to message #359813] |
Tue, 25 November 2008 22:38 |
|
R315r4z0r
Messages: 3836
Registered: March 2005
Location: New York
Karma: 0
|
General (3 Stars) |
|
|
| pawkyfox wrote on Tue, 25 November 2008 08:54 |
R3, I am sick of your liberalism. You don't get it do you? Child porn requires REAL children to perfom the hideous acts. Think man.
|
What's funny is that I don't consider myself a Liberal... in fact I voted for McCain... lol.
Watching said things is not committing the act. Watching the video may or may not be indirectly responsible for the demand of people committing said crimes, but that in no way should be the care or concern of the person watching the video or looking at the image. As long as you aren't doing and/or somehow apart of, and/or a witness of the illegal act, you should be able to watch or view it being done by someone else.
What I mean is this.
It should be illegal to:
1. Commit said crimes physically.
2. Directly assist or aid someone else in committing said crimes. (Such as being the camera guy or simply donating to people who commit such crimes)
3. Witness said crimes (physically or through a medium) with complete undeniable knowledge that it isn't an act, and not report them, or else be held as an accomplice. (Such as being an audience member viewing the crime as it is being committed, be it through physical means or through some media like digital video. (Meaning if you tune into this crime being done live, and you know that the people aren't acting but are physically committing a crime, then you are put in a spot were you must report it to the authorities or else be held as an accomplice)
That is it. If I was to go onto google, right now, and look up bestiality porn or what have you, then save the images to my computer, I, in no way shape or form, should be liable for the acts committed in the images and/or videos that I collect because I personally did nothing to contribute to the person committing that crime. For all I know or care to know it could be faked, unreal, or even already be being investigated.
..err I'm no good at legal talk, so forgive me if you couldn't understand me through my run-on sentences...
|
|
|
|
| Re: Best Article EVAR! [message #359983 is a reply to message #359590] |
Wed, 26 November 2008 04:36 |
 |
u6795
Messages: 1261
Registered: March 2006
Location: Maryland
Karma: 0
|
General (1 Star) |
|
|
Dude, if bestiality is your thing then that's cool because I'm very accepting...
...but seriously what the fuck why would you DO THAT??!
yeah
|
|
|
|
| Re: Best Article EVAR! [message #359996 is a reply to message #359959] |
Wed, 26 November 2008 06:54 |
|
|
| R315r4z0r wrote on Wed, 26 November 2008 00:38 |
| pawkyfox wrote on Tue, 25 November 2008 08:54 |
R3, I am sick of your liberalism. You don't get it do you? Child porn requires REAL children to perfom the hideous acts. Think man.
|
What's funny is that I don't consider myself a Liberal... in fact I voted for McCain... lol.
Watching said things is not committing the act. Watching the video may or may not be indirectly responsible for the demand of people committing said crimes, but that in no way should be the care or concern of the person watching the video or looking at the image. As long as you aren't doing and/or somehow apart of, and/or a witness of the illegal act, you should be able to watch or view it being done by someone else.
What I mean is this.
It should be illegal to:
1. Commit said crimes physically.
2. Directly assist or aid someone else in committing said crimes. (Such as being the camera guy or simply donating to people who commit such crimes)
3. Witness said crimes (physically or through a medium) with complete undeniable knowledge that it isn't an act, and not report them, or else be held as an accomplice. (Such as being an audience member viewing the crime as it is being committed, be it through physical means or through some media like digital video. (Meaning if you tune into this crime being done live, and you know that the people aren't acting but are physically committing a crime, then you are put in a spot were you must report it to the authorities or else be held as an accomplice)
That is it. If I was to go onto google, right now, and look up bestiality porn or what have you, then save the images to my computer, I, in no way shape or form, should be liable for the acts committed in the images and/or videos that I collect because I personally did nothing to contribute to the person committing that crime. For all I know or care to know it could be faked, unreal, or even already be being investigated.
..err I'm no good at legal talk, so forgive me if you couldn't understand me through my run-on sentences...
|
So you said what I did, but just in a long-winded reply?
Libertarian Party | The King's Throne | The Soda Shop
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Best Article EVAR! [message #360019 is a reply to message #359997] |
Wed, 26 November 2008 10:10 |
|
u6795
Messages: 1261
Registered: March 2006
Location: Maryland
Karma: 0
|
General (1 Star) |
|
|
| Ma1kel wrote on Wed, 26 November 2008 09:16 |
Well he voted McCain, what you expect? Intelligence?
| Ryu wrote on Tue, 25 November 2008 13:00 |
well I don't want to eat a chicken that some guy spunked in... do you?
|
Yea, I would. Chickens are A LOT dirtier than that.
|
Obama zombies aren't exactly 100% scholarly folk either. On each side of the coin you'll find your brainwashed dumbasses, but judging by who won it's clear to tell who had more.
yeah
|
|
|
|
Search
Help
Members
Register
Login
Home
