|
|
|
|
| Re: Make the transport Helicopters more efficient? [message #344206 is a reply to message #342707] |
Fri, 01 August 2008 02:03   |
 |
Goztow
Messages: 9722
Registered: March 2005
Location: Belgium
Karma: 13
|
General (5 Stars)
Goztoe |
|
|
Parachutes makes the game too different IMO. It's like allowing the taunt bug to be used. If smth needs to change, then it'd be the armour type of the trans heli.
You can find me in The KOSs2 (TK2) discord while I'm playing. Feel free to come and say hi! TK2 discord
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Make the transport Helicopters more efficient? [message #344527 is a reply to message #344520] |
Sat, 02 August 2008 10:54 |
 |
havoc9826
Messages: 562
Registered: April 2006
Location: California, USA
Karma: 0
|
Colonel |
|
|
| CarrierII wrote on Sat, 02 August 2008 08:57 |
| havoc9826 wrote on Fri, 01 August 2008 04:57 |
| CarrierII wrote on Thu, 31 July 2008 10:39 |
How can something that has less endurance than a stank and has the purpose of an APC work or be useful?
|
|
I'm going to call out City_Flying video there. You had at least five of the damn things... that's different, half of them still DIED before you got to the PP, which clearly shows they fail at their presumed purpose - to be a flying APC.
|
You're right... although Chinooks often fare much better on Walls_Flying, that's only because there's no Obelisk, which takes off 300 of its 400 in one shot (plus that stank hit us for another 90 and triggered the <= 20 hp auto eject). Base defenses really do limit or nullify any usefulness of the transport helicopters, unless one manages to sneak by while some other vehicles are taking fire as decoys. It was extremely fun to do that rush just for the heck of it, though. Also, there were 6 piñatas in that rush 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Make the transport Helicopters more efficient? [message #344727 is a reply to message #342707] |
Sun, 03 August 2008 17:00 |
 |
sadukar09
Messages: 2812
Registered: May 2007
Location: Ottawa,Canada
Karma: 0
|
General (2 Stars) |
|
|
Being on the ground>air.
I mean really, who wants to fall to their deaths?
| Quote: |
[19:16:48] <APBBR> @ryan3k: THE ENFIELD DEFIES THE LAWS OF PHYSICS BECAUSE THE BULLETS INSTANTLY HIT THEIR TARGETS LOL
[19:16:52] <APBBR> @ryan3k: CHRONO TECHNOLOGY IN TEH BULLETS
|
| Quote: |
[22:48]<APBBR> @V0LK0V: AOL COMING UR WAI K
[22:48] <APBBR> Host: Quitting due to Westwood Online connection loss.
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Make the transport Helicopters more efficient? [message #344818 is a reply to message #342707] |
Mon, 04 August 2008 05:38 |
=HT=T-Bird
Messages: 712
Registered: June 2005
Karma: 0
|
Colonel |
|
|
As far as speed goes, the Chinook should be at least as fast as the Apache, if not fastER...(IRL, the Apache pilots keep having to ask the Chinook pilots to slow down )
HTT-Bird (IRC)
HTTBird (WOL)
Proud HazTeam Lieutenant.
BlackIntel Coder & Moderator.
If you have trouble running BIATCH on your FDS, have some questions about a BIATCH message or log entry, or think that BIATCH spit out a false positive, PLEASE contact the BlackIntel coding team and avoid wasting the time of others.
|
|
|
|
Search
Help
Members
Register
Login
Home
