Renegade Public Forums
C&C: Renegade --> Dying since 2003™, resurrected in 2024!
Home » General Discussions » General Discussion » Windows XP-Seeing the actual specs of comp?
Windows XP-Seeing the actual specs of comp? [message #317300] Fri, 15 February 2008 14:44 Go to next message
bat66wat6
Messages: 331
Registered: September 2007
Karma: 0
Recruit
Okay.
This is closely(Closely more meaning directly)connected to a game problem.

"Windows virtual Memory minimum to low"

So the game (AVP2) needs 128MB RAM to run efficiently.
I have no idea how much RAM this thing has in it. I have looked in the Accessories>System Tools>System Information but have only found all the little nitty grities about what the thing actually has "In" it. Such as drivers, CD-ROM/DVD etc

Can someone please tell me how I can actually find out the REAL specs on my P.C?
My OS (Operating System) is Windows XP Home Edition.

P.S:
A about the AVP2 game problem. AVP2 is more than 4 years old. If not a little more/less. This computer never had problems running it before. Why problems such as lag now?
Re: Windows XP-Seeing the actual specs of comp? [message #317303 is a reply to message #317300] Fri, 15 February 2008 14:50 Go to previous messageGo to next message
havoc9826 is currently offline  havoc9826
Messages: 562
Registered: April 2006
Location: California, USA
Karma: 0
Colonel
Belarc Advisor
CPU-Z
System Requirements Lab (online only, uses Javascript)


http://img82.imageshack.us/img82/8886/CommandoSig.jpg
Re: Windows XP-Seeing the actual specs of comp? [message #317304 is a reply to message #317300] Fri, 15 February 2008 14:51 Go to previous messageGo to next message
JPNOD is currently offline  JPNOD
Messages: 807
Registered: April 2004
Location: Area 51
Karma: 0
Colonel
Get Everest Home edition
Or Sisoft Sandra, to see whats inside your PC.

http://www.starfix.nl/download


WOL nick: JPNOD
Re: Windows XP-Seeing the actual specs of comp? [message #317305 is a reply to message #317300] Fri, 15 February 2008 14:51 Go to previous messageGo to next message
cheesesoda is currently offline  cheesesoda
Messages: 6506
Registered: March 2003
Location: Jackson, Michigan
Karma: 0
General (5 Stars)

Why don't you JUST FUCKING GOOGLE IT?

Seriously, I'm getting tired of everybody coming in here and posting questions to shit that can be so EASILY found by simply using a search engine. Let alone that this is the WRONG SECTION to be posting these TECHNICAL issues in.


[Updated on: Fri, 15 February 2008 14:52]

Report message to a moderator

Re: Windows XP-Seeing the actual specs of comp? [message #317308 is a reply to message #317300] Fri, 15 February 2008 14:58 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Lone0001 is currently offline  Lone0001
Messages: 2112
Registered: August 2006
Location: Ontario, Canada
Karma: 0
General (2 Stars)

http://freshdevices.com/ has a number of useful programs Fresh Diagnose I believe is the one that tells you information about your computer, and Fresh UI lets you change hidden settings on your computer, and all these programs are FREE you just have to enter a key that you will get via email.

[Updated on: Fri, 15 February 2008 14:59]

Report message to a moderator

Re: Windows XP-Seeing the actual specs of comp? [message #317315 is a reply to message #317300] Fri, 15 February 2008 15:11 Go to previous messageGo to next message
cnc95fan is currently offline  cnc95fan
Messages: 1260
Registered: July 2007
Karma: 0
General (1 Star)
Start > Run > Dxdiag.
In future, use Google..


Cabal8616 wrote on Sun, 27 April 2008 15:50

I say a personal fanning of the genitals would be awesome.


RA3 AUTOMATICLY SUCKS
www.battlefordune.co.uk
Re: Windows XP-Seeing the actual specs of comp? [message #317320 is a reply to message #317315] Fri, 15 February 2008 15:29 Go to previous messageGo to next message
bat66wat6
Messages: 331
Registered: September 2007
Karma: 0
Recruit
Thank you. I now have the Information I was after & more. That Start>Run dxdiag is really good! Is that on all Windows comps?
----------------------------------------------------------------
------------------
System Information
------------------
Time of this report: 2/15/2008, 22:23:43
Machine name: {Edited Out Sneaky }
Operating System: Windows XP Home Edition (5.1, Build 2600) Service Pack 1 (2600.xpsp2.050301-1526)
Language: English (Regional Setting: English)
System Manufacturer: Notebook
System Model: MID2020
BIOS: Insyde Software MobilePRO BIOS Version 4.00.01
Processor: Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz
Memory: 224MB RAM
Page File: 277MB used, 343MB available
Windows Dir: C:\WINDOWS
DirectX Version: DirectX 9.0b (4.09.0000.0902)
DX Setup Parameters: Not found
DxDiag Version: 5.03.0001.0902 32bit Unicode
----------------------------------------------------------------
Okay so the RAM is enough by far. The game(AVP2) requires 128MB of RAM in order to run efficiently. This thing has 224MB RAM.
Why is my Computer making a Paging file and bitching about there not being enough memory? The graphics sound card is all up to scratch for the game. If not higher than what it needs to be!

What the hell's going on?
Oh and, I do shut off all programmes except necessary ones needed when playing AVP2.

[Updated on: Fri, 15 February 2008 15:31]

Report message to a moderator

Re: Windows XP-Seeing the actual specs of comp? [message #317328 is a reply to message #317300] Fri, 15 February 2008 16:49 Go to previous messageGo to next message
danpaul88 is currently offline  danpaul88
Messages: 5795
Registered: June 2004
Location: England
Karma: 0
General (5 Stars)
Don't forget that Windows XP itself also needs some RAM to run. That machine barely qualifies to run XP decently tbh, you might be better off using Windows 98 on there. It has a fairly decent processor but severely limited RAM.

http://steamsignature.com/card/1/76561197975867233.png
Re: Windows XP-Seeing the actual specs of comp? [message #317332 is a reply to message #317328] Fri, 15 February 2008 16:55 Go to previous messageGo to next message
bat66wat6
Messages: 331
Registered: September 2007
Karma: 0
Recruit
So basically this computer is a peice of shit and can't run a game above 128MB mark properly?

That's it then?

Another. Go out and get a new computer matter?
Ah man...That sucks!

I wont be able to afford my own proper computer(One that needs loads of space and a Desk, P.C Chair etc)until im like 22!
That's one long ass wait! Huh
Re: Windows XP-Seeing the actual specs of comp? [message #317333 is a reply to message #317300] Fri, 15 February 2008 16:56 Go to previous messageGo to next message
havoc9826 is currently offline  havoc9826
Messages: 562
Registered: April 2006
Location: California, USA
Karma: 0
Colonel
Though danpaul88 is probably correct, AVP might also be asking for a graphics card that has a minimum of 128 MB of its own VRAM. What kind of graphics card does dxdiag say you have?

http://img82.imageshack.us/img82/8886/CommandoSig.jpg
Re: Windows XP-Seeing the actual specs of comp? [message #317334 is a reply to message #317300] Fri, 15 February 2008 16:57 Go to previous messageGo to next message
cnc95fan is currently offline  cnc95fan
Messages: 1260
Registered: July 2007
Karma: 0
General (1 Star)
It's not just programs that take up ram, or page file, it's processes too.
Ctrl + Alt + Del "Processes" then take a look. You'll be amazed at the amount of ram some things need. My version of XP usually uses 512mb of RAM on its own, never mind other things. Like dan said, you should go to 98 or 2000. But your processor, being a P4, means the motherboard should be fairly decent, so you could cheaply upgrade it.


Cabal8616 wrote on Sun, 27 April 2008 15:50

I say a personal fanning of the genitals would be awesome.


RA3 AUTOMATICLY SUCKS
www.battlefordune.co.uk
Re: Windows XP-Seeing the actual specs of comp? [message #317336 is a reply to message #317334] Fri, 15 February 2008 17:11 Go to previous messageGo to next message
bat66wat6
Messages: 331
Registered: September 2007
Karma: 0
Recruit
Yeah. That's what I meant.
I turned all the stuff off.

Not just the tasks in Tasmsgr but also some Processes that have no purpose.
The problem is that some of the big things that use 32,000+KB are things that XP needs to run. Like explorer.exe. etc

Anything i recognise or I don't see as Comp related I turn off before starting the game. Especially if im gonna be on it long term(+2 hours).

Not much more I can do to free RAM really. First i thought. It's all the utilities I still got from Renegade on this thing(I uninstalled Renegade to make way for AVP2 Blush ). But logic hits reminding me that RAM isn't GB space. It's whats needed for things that are actually running. Not installed...

Not fair really.
Sometimes I see computers and games as a challenge. To update it, make sure it's compatible, maintain working internet, make sure drivers/graphics are compatible, RAM ok,GB space ok.
It's alot of check boxes to tick. And sometimes seems like a big waste of time Dont Get It
Re: Windows XP-Seeing the actual specs of comp? [message #317337 is a reply to message #317300] Fri, 15 February 2008 17:14 Go to previous messageGo to next message
cnc95fan is currently offline  cnc95fan
Messages: 1260
Registered: July 2007
Karma: 0
General (1 Star)
Make your page file bigger.

Cabal8616 wrote on Sun, 27 April 2008 15:50

I say a personal fanning of the genitals would be awesome.


RA3 AUTOMATICLY SUCKS
www.battlefordune.co.uk
Re: Windows XP-Seeing the actual specs of comp? [message #317338 is a reply to message #317300] Fri, 15 February 2008 17:38 Go to previous messageGo to next message
danpaul88 is currently offline  danpaul88
Messages: 5795
Registered: June 2004
Location: England
Karma: 0
General (5 Stars)
I don't know what you are like for money, but it might be worth asking at a local computer shop to see how much they would charge you to add some more RAM, perhaps an extra 512mb or 1gb, depending on how much the motherboard can take in each socket. As I said previously, it has a good processor but is severely limited in RAM, so just adding an extra stick would probably give you a massive performance increase. If that stick was a 1gb stick you would have almost 5x the original amount of RAM, and at the moment RAM is cheap as chips. (no pun intended)

http://steamsignature.com/card/1/76561197975867233.png
Re: Windows XP-Seeing the actual specs of comp? [message #317372 is a reply to message #317338] Sat, 16 February 2008 07:28 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Caveman is currently offline  Caveman
Messages: 2476
Registered: July 2005
Location: Wales, UK
Karma: 0
General (2 Stars)

To compensate for low RAM I would highly recommend increasing the page file.

Do the following;

Windows key + pause/break > Advanced > Performance settings > Advanced > Virtual memory change > Pick the C: drive > Custom settings > Initial size : 512 > Maximum 1024 > Set > OK

Try that. Let me know if you still get problems.


CarrierII wrote

BLUEHTHEN YOU AR NOT JUST A BIG CHEATAS AND YOU THE BIG HEAD JUST YOU USE FLY H4X FUCK YOU BIG CHEATAS YOUR CHEATZ IS BAD YOU WANT I WRAUGHT THIS YOUR CHEATZ IS BAD HEY IS 1 YEAR YOUR PROMESS A FLY HAX IN MULTIPLAYER AND IS DONT JUST TROOPRM02 I TELL IT ALL WHO REPLYER IN THIS FORUM YOU CHEATZ

Please don't make me type something like that again, not using puntuation is annoying.


http://r9.fodey.com/2158/bc450f3ca15045e9bdd7651fa49f3a0a.0.gif
Re: Windows XP-Seeing the actual specs of comp? [message #317375 is a reply to message #317300] Sat, 16 February 2008 08:16 Go to previous messageGo to next message
danpaul88 is currently offline  danpaul88
Messages: 5795
Registered: June 2004
Location: England
Karma: 0
General (5 Stars)
Page file is a LOT slower than real RAM though, so you won't get anywhere near the performance gains you would get by adding real RAM.

http://steamsignature.com/card/1/76561197975867233.png
Re: Windows XP-Seeing the actual specs of comp? [message #317376 is a reply to message #317375] Sat, 16 February 2008 08:19 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Caveman is currently offline  Caveman
Messages: 2476
Registered: July 2005
Location: Wales, UK
Karma: 0
General (2 Stars)

danpaul88 wrote on Sat, 16 February 2008 15:16

Page file is a LOT slower than real RAM though, so you won't get anywhere near the performance gains you would get by adding real RAM.


True however its a nice and cost free way to boast performance a little due to low ram.

But yes increasing the RAM would be more beneficial.


CarrierII wrote

BLUEHTHEN YOU AR NOT JUST A BIG CHEATAS AND YOU THE BIG HEAD JUST YOU USE FLY H4X FUCK YOU BIG CHEATAS YOUR CHEATZ IS BAD YOU WANT I WRAUGHT THIS YOUR CHEATZ IS BAD HEY IS 1 YEAR YOUR PROMESS A FLY HAX IN MULTIPLAYER AND IS DONT JUST TROOPRM02 I TELL IT ALL WHO REPLYER IN THIS FORUM YOU CHEATZ

Please don't make me type something like that again, not using puntuation is annoying.


http://r9.fodey.com/2158/bc450f3ca15045e9bdd7651fa49f3a0a.0.gif
Re: Windows XP-Seeing the actual specs of comp? [message #317377 is a reply to message #317300] Sat, 16 February 2008 08:25 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Ryu is currently offline  Ryu
Messages: 2833
Registered: September 2006
Location: Liverpool, England.
Karma: 0
General (2 Stars)

You nearly have 3.0Ghz clock speed, yet so low on ram? were did you buy that computer?

Presence is a curious thing, if you think you need to prove it... you probably never had it in the first place.
Re: Windows XP-Seeing the actual specs of comp? [message #317379 is a reply to message #317300] Sat, 16 February 2008 08:40 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Jamie or NuneGa is currently offline  Jamie or NuneGa
Messages: 954
Registered: June 2007
Karma: 0
Colonel
You know both the problems you posted about could have been solved by using CCleaner...

http://img504.imageshack.us/img504/8789/avilj4.jpg

Jamie is a guys name in Europe...
Re: Windows XP-Seeing the actual specs of comp? [message #317380 is a reply to message #317336] Sat, 16 February 2008 08:40 Go to previous messageGo to next message
rm5248 is currently offline  rm5248
Messages: 1156
Registered: November 2003
Location: USA
Karma: 0
General (1 Star)
bat66wat6 wrote on Fri, 15 February 2008 18:11


The problem is that some of the big things that use 32,000+KB are things that XP needs to run. Like explorer.exe. etc


Actually, you don't really need to have explorer.exe running. You can shut it off when you play games or something, then just CTL+ALT+DEL and select 'New Task' and type in 'explorer'. It will come back up. Everything else I'm not sure about. (Basically the only thing that explorer does is allow you to have a GUI for browsing. It contains the start bar and stuff like that... )


w00t?
Re: Windows XP-Seeing the actual specs of comp? [message #317385 is a reply to message #317320] Sat, 16 February 2008 10:34 Go to previous message
JPNOD is currently offline  JPNOD
Messages: 807
Registered: April 2004
Location: Area 51
Karma: 0
Colonel
bat66wat6 wrote on Fri, 15 February 2008 17:29

Thank you. I now have the Information I was after & more. That Start>Run dxdiag is really good! Is that on all Windows comps?
----------------------------------------------------------------
------------------
System Information
------------------
Time of this report: 2/15/2008, 22:23:43
Machine name: {Edited Out Sneaky }
Operating System: Windows XP Home Edition (5.1, Build 2600) Service Pack 1 (2600.xpsp2.050301-1526)
Language: English (Regional Setting: English)
System Manufacturer: Notebook
System Model: MID2020
BIOS: Insyde Software MobilePRO BIOS Version 4.00.01
Processor: Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz
Memory: 224MB RAM






Looks to me like it has a integrated graphics card which shares the system memmory (Onboard video) That's the reason why it's saying you have 224MB ram instead of 256. The VGA is sharing 32MB.

Playing Games with onboard VGA is really doubtfull ( It's most likely an Intel GMA aswell. If I were you I wouln't spend to much on the laptop.
And just get a new PC.

And as much as been saying 256 is barely enough to run XP with all the eyecandy on.


WOL nick: JPNOD
Previous Topic: Linux
Next Topic: Internet Explorer-Deleting Web History Stuff-Plz help
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Thu May 09 20:19:48 MST 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.01039 seconds