Renegade Public Forums
C&C: Renegade --> Dying since 2003™, resurrected in 2024!
Home » General Discussions » Heated Discussions and Debates » God responds to lawsuit
God responds to lawsuit [message #285483] Fri, 21 September 2007 07:37 Go to next message
PlastoJoe is currently offline  PlastoJoe
Messages: 647
Registered: October 2005
Karma: 0
Colonel
Here.

My question is, why would God pick that particular law office?


http://qntm.org/files/board/current.png


You may be a fundamentalist atheist if...


Toggle Spoiler

[Updated on: Fri, 21 September 2007 07:39]

Report message to a moderator

Re: God responds to lawsuit [message #285484 is a reply to message #285483] Fri, 21 September 2007 07:42 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Ryu is currently offline  Ryu
Messages: 2833
Registered: September 2006
Location: Liverpool, England.
Karma: 0
General (2 Stars)

So God is real?

Hi God! Can you buy me a great computer?

Lol.

EDIT: I believe this really happened but don't give a fuck.. Am I retarded?


Presence is a curious thing, if you think you need to prove it... you probably never had it in the first place.

[Updated on: Fri, 21 September 2007 07:43]

Report message to a moderator

Re: God responds to lawsuit [message #285485 is a reply to message #285483] Fri, 21 September 2007 07:45 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Nightma12 is currently offline  Nightma12
Messages: 2593
Registered: August 2003
Karma: 0
General (2 Stars)
Category Moderator
0.o

wtf? "it appeared on the table"

is this fake? a joke?
Re: God responds to lawsuit [message #285493 is a reply to message #285483] Fri, 21 September 2007 08:06 Go to previous messageGo to next message
DarkDemin is currently offline  DarkDemin
Messages: 1483
Registered: March 2003
Karma: 0
General (1 Star)
Quote:

Chambers, a self-proclaimed agnostic who often criticizes Christians, said his filing was triggered by a federal lawsuit he considers frivolous. He said he's trying to makes the point that anybody can sue anybody.


Quote:

a self-proclaimed agnostic who often criticizes Christians, said his filing was triggered by a federal lawsuit he considers frivolous. He said he's trying to makes the point that anybody


Quote:

who often criticizes Christians, said his filing was triggered by a federal lawsuit he considers frivolous. He said he's trying to makes the point that


Quote:

trying to makes the point that



GRAMMAR CHECK MOTHERFUCKER, DO YOU USE IT!


http://www.tiberiumforums.net/sig/tiberiumforumssig.jpg
Re: God responds to lawsuit [message #285496 is a reply to message #285493] Fri, 21 September 2007 08:17 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Ryu is currently offline  Ryu
Messages: 2833
Registered: September 2006
Location: Liverpool, England.
Karma: 0
General (2 Stars)

DarkDemin wrote on Fri, 21 September 2007 10:06



GRAMMAR CHECK MOTHERFUCKER, DO YOU USE IT!


Was that a question or a statement?

Grammar check, Mother fucker.


Presence is a curious thing, if you think you need to prove it... you probably never had it in the first place.
Re: God responds to lawsuit [message #285508 is a reply to message #285483] Fri, 21 September 2007 09:51 Go to previous messageGo to next message
KIRBY-098 is currently offline  KIRBY-098
Messages: 338
Registered: July 2006
Karma: 0
Recruit
I was kind of hoping his response would have been a meteor or the kind of lightning storms from RA2 Yuri's revenge.


Oh well.
Re: God responds to lawsuit [message #285521 is a reply to message #285484] Fri, 21 September 2007 11:42 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Starbuzz is currently offline  Starbuzz
Messages: 2487
Registered: May 2007
Karma: 2
General (2 Stars)
Ryu wrote on Fri, 21 September 2007 09:42

So God is real?

Hi God! Can you buy me a great computer?

Lol.

EDIT: I believe this really happened but don't give a fuck.. Am I retarded?


I am just LOLing man! LOL Big Grin


buzzsigfinal
Re: God responds to lawsuit [message #285544 is a reply to message #285483] Fri, 21 September 2007 13:13 Go to previous messageGo to next message
luv2pb is currently offline  luv2pb
Messages: 1488
Registered: February 2004
Karma: 0
General (1 Star)
Not everything is as it appears
Untouchable
That story is true. I read about it the other day on MSN when the senitor first filed the lawsuite.

N00bstories Director Of Operations
Re: God responds to lawsuit [message #285579 is a reply to message #285496] Fri, 21 September 2007 16:08 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Rocko
Messages: 833
Registered: January 2007
Location: Long Beach, California
Karma: 0
Colonel
Ryu wrote on Fri, 21 September 2007 10:17

DarkDemin wrote on Fri, 21 September 2007 10:06



GRAMMAR CHECK MOTHERFUCKER, DO YOU USE IT!


Was that a question or a statement?

Grammar check, Mother fucker.


owned faggot


black and proud
Re: God responds to lawsuit [message #285593 is a reply to message #285483] Fri, 21 September 2007 17:34 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Crimson is currently offline  Crimson
Messages: 7428
Registered: February 2003
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Karma: 0
General (5 Stars)
ADMINISTRATOR
Obviously some mortal human here on earth made that happen. Believers can't handle someone trying to prove there is no god and will make every effort to interfere with it.

I'm the bawss.
Re: God responds to lawsuit [message #285595 is a reply to message #285593] Fri, 21 September 2007 17:41 Go to previous messageGo to next message
cheesesoda is currently offline  cheesesoda
Messages: 6506
Registered: March 2003
Location: Jackson, Michigan
Karma: 0
General (5 Stars)

Crimson wrote on Fri, 21 September 2007 20:34

Obviously some mortal human here on earth made that happen. Believers can't handle someone trying to prove there is no god and will make every effort to interfere with it.

Yes, it's called a belief system. If someone insults your beliefs, it makes complete sense to try and defend your beliefs. You know, the same way Republicans try and defend the Iraq War.


Re: God responds to lawsuit [message #285616 is a reply to message #285483] Fri, 21 September 2007 21:27 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Jecht is currently offline  Jecht
Messages: 3156
Registered: September 2004
Karma: 0
General (3 Stars)
Doesn't being agnostic mean that you don't fully understand God's will? If so, then why does he feel he is qualified?

http://img148.imageshack.us/img148/9146/hartyn4.png
Re: God responds to lawsuit [message #285628 is a reply to message #285483] Sat, 22 September 2007 01:40 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Tunaman
Messages: 1189
Registered: January 2005
Karma: 2
General (1 Star)
I think that Agnostic basically means you believe there is a higher power, but do not believe in any certain god or higher power; basically you don't know what the higher power is.

http://img694.imageshack.us/img694/9055/tunamanlmao.png
Re: God responds to lawsuit [message #285643 is a reply to message #285628] Sat, 22 September 2007 05:04 Go to previous messageGo to next message
cheesesoda is currently offline  cheesesoda
Messages: 6506
Registered: March 2003
Location: Jackson, Michigan
Karma: 0
General (5 Stars)

Tunaman wrote on Sat, 22 September 2007 04:40

I think that Agnostic basically means you believe there is a higher power, but do not believe in any certain god or higher power; basically you don't know what the higher power is.

I think that's deism. I think agnosticism is not denying the existence of a god, but you're not sure if there is one.


Re: God responds to lawsuit [message #285645 is a reply to message #285483] Sat, 22 September 2007 05:19 Go to previous messageGo to next message
CarrierII is currently offline  CarrierII
Messages: 3804
Registered: February 2006
Location: England
Karma: 0
General (3 Stars)

The definition I had to learn for an exam was

Agnostic - not being sure as to whether God exists.


Renguard is a wonderful initiative
Toggle Spoiler
Re: God responds to lawsuit [message #285733 is a reply to message #285483] Sat, 22 September 2007 13:36 Go to previous messageGo to next message
nikki6ixx is currently offline  nikki6ixx
Messages: 2545
Registered: August 2007
Karma: 0
General (2 Stars)
This could set one hell of a precedent.

Should the obese sue Buddha or Santa Claus for making them fat bastards?


Renegade:
Aircraftkiller wrote on Fri, 10 January 2014 16:56

The only game where everyone competes to be an e-janitor.
Re: God responds to lawsuit [message #285829 is a reply to message #285483] Sun, 23 September 2007 04:28 Go to previous messageGo to next message
=HT=T-Bird is currently offline  =HT=T-Bird
Messages: 712
Registered: June 2005
Karma: 0
Colonel
Actually, Chambers is trying to make the point that you should let the legal system do its job without legislative interference by having this lawsuit thrown out.

HTT-Bird (IRC)
HTTBird (WOL)
Proud HazTeam Lieutenant.
BlackIntel Coder & Moderator.

If you have trouble running BIATCH on your FDS, have some questions about a BIATCH message or log entry, or think that BIATCH spit out a false positive, PLEASE contact the BlackIntel coding team and avoid wasting the time of others.
Re: God responds to lawsuit [message #285840 is a reply to message #285483] Sun, 23 September 2007 06:17 Go to previous messageGo to next message
DarkDemin is currently offline  DarkDemin
Messages: 1483
Registered: March 2003
Karma: 0
General (1 Star)
It was a statement... it should never be a question.

http://www.tiberiumforums.net/sig/tiberiumforumssig.jpg
Re: God responds to lawsuit [message #285845 is a reply to message #285643] Sun, 23 September 2007 07:17 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Crimson is currently offline  Crimson
Messages: 7428
Registered: February 2003
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Karma: 0
General (5 Stars)
ADMINISTRATOR
cheesesoda wrote on Sat, 22 September 2007 05:04

Tunaman wrote on Sat, 22 September 2007 04:40

I think that Agnostic basically means you believe there is a higher power, but do not believe in any certain god or higher power; basically you don't know what the higher power is.

I think that's deism. I think agnosticism is not denying the existence of a god, but you're not sure if there is one.


Well if that ain't the pot calling the kettle black, I don't know what is. I have asked repeatedly for proof of God's existence and yet my "God detector" remains at "No".

http://www.yo-god.com/


I'm the bawss.
Re: God responds to lawsuit [message #285847 is a reply to message #285483] Sun, 23 September 2007 07:27 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Kamuix is currently offline  Kamuix
Messages: 1247
Registered: May 2005
Location: Ontario, Canada
Karma: 0
General (1 Star)
Crimson, PM please. Wink
Re: God responds to lawsuit [message #285852 is a reply to message #285845] Sun, 23 September 2007 07:48 Go to previous messageGo to next message
cheesesoda is currently offline  cheesesoda
Messages: 6506
Registered: March 2003
Location: Jackson, Michigan
Karma: 0
General (5 Stars)

Crimson wrote on Sun, 23 September 2007 10:17

cheesesoda wrote on Sat, 22 September 2007 05:04

Tunaman wrote on Sat, 22 September 2007 04:40

I think that Agnostic basically means you believe there is a higher power, but do not believe in any certain god or higher power; basically you don't know what the higher power is.

I think that's deism. I think agnosticism is not denying the existence of a god, but you're not sure if there is one.


Well if that ain't the pot calling the kettle black, I don't know what is. I have asked repeatedly for proof of God's existence and yet my "God detector" remains at "No".

http://www.yo-god.com/

You obviously don't know what is, then. Me correcting someone on the definition of a belief system is hardly being hypocritical.


Re: God responds to lawsuit [message #285869 is a reply to message #285593] Sun, 23 September 2007 08:43 Go to previous messageGo to next message
R315r4z0r is currently offline  R315r4z0r
Messages: 3836
Registered: March 2005
Location: New York
Karma: 0
General (3 Stars)
Crimson wrote on Fri, 21 September 2007 20:34

Obviously some mortal human here on earth made that happen. Believers can't handle someone trying to prove there is no god and will make every effort to interfere with it.

I don't think that is true. Because people who believe in God, wouldn't go impersonating him.
Re: God responds to lawsuit [message #285904 is a reply to message #285845] Sun, 23 September 2007 13:27 Go to previous messageGo to next message
BlueThen is currently offline  BlueThen
Messages: 2402
Registered: February 2006
Karma: 0
General (2 Stars)
Crimson wrote on Sun, 23 September 2007 09:17

cheesesoda wrote on Sat, 22 September 2007 05:04

Tunaman wrote on Sat, 22 September 2007 04:40

I think that Agnostic basically means you believe there is a higher power, but do not believe in any certain god or higher power; basically you don't know what the higher power is.

I think that's deism. I think agnosticism is not denying the existence of a god, but you're not sure if there is one.


Well if that ain't the pot calling the kettle black, I don't know what is. I have asked repeatedly for proof of God's existence and yet my "God detector" remains at "No".

http://www.yo-god.com/




Take it apart, it's probably just a arrow screwed onto a box or something just to turn christians into nonbelievers or something... >.>
Re: God responds to lawsuit [message #285962 is a reply to message #285845] Sun, 23 September 2007 17:51 Go to previous messageGo to next message
warranto is currently offline  warranto
Messages: 2584
Registered: February 2003
Location: Alberta, Canada
Karma: 0
General (2 Stars)
Crimson wrote on Sun, 23 September 2007 08:17

cheesesoda wrote on Sat, 22 September 2007 05:04

Tunaman wrote on Sat, 22 September 2007 04:40

I think that Agnostic basically means you believe there is a higher power, but do not believe in any certain god or higher power; basically you don't know what the higher power is.

I think that's deism. I think agnosticism is not denying the existence of a god, but you're not sure if there is one.


Well if that ain't the pot calling the kettle black, I don't know what is. I have asked repeatedly for proof of God's existence and yet my "God detector" remains at "No".

http://www.yo-god.com/


Interesting, I've also asked for proof. Though have yet to receive any kind of proof either for OR against. However, my "God detector" (no, not the kind being sold at that site) remains at yes.

I, as a believer, welcome ANY attempt to prove God doesn't exist. I have yet to see that happen, and it never will.
Re: God responds to lawsuit [message #285965 is a reply to message #285962] Sun, 23 September 2007 18:02 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
Starbuzz is currently offline  Starbuzz
Messages: 2487
Registered: May 2007
Karma: 2
General (2 Stars)
warranto wrote on Mon, 24 September 2007 01:51


I, as a believer, welcome ANY attempt to prove God doesn't exist. I have yet to see that happen, and it never will.


It never will because it is a belief. God cannot be proven to exist and God cannot be proven to not exist. Because it is a belief; you believe there is a god.

As an example in the same way, I can say that there are alien motherships out there. You cannot prove or disprove that either because it would be my stubborn belief that they (the aliens) are out there. So, I welcome ANY attempt to prove the aliens are not there.

It is a belief.


buzzsigfinal

[Updated on: Sun, 23 September 2007 18:06]

Report message to a moderator

Previous Topic: Was this right?
Next Topic: Whodunnit?!?!
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Wed May 15 09:18:33 MST 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.01237 seconds