Renegade Public Forums
C&C: Renegade --> Dying since 2003™, resurrected in 2024!
Home » General Discussions » Heated Discussions and Debates » Jarhead Sucks
Jarhead Sucks [message #178403] Tue, 08 November 2005 15:36 Go to next message
bigejoe14 is currently offline  bigejoe14
Messages: 1302
Registered: February 2003
Karma: 0
General (1 Star)
An overdramatic, peice of crap, crybaby movie. Thanks again, Hollywood!

WHATEVER, FAGGOT

[Updated on: Tue, 08 November 2005 15:36]

Report message to a moderator

Re: Jarhead Sucks [message #178405 is a reply to message #178403] Tue, 08 November 2005 15:42 Go to previous messageGo to next message
SuperFlyingEngi is currently offline  SuperFlyingEngi
Messages: 1756
Registered: November 2003
Karma: 0
General (1 Star)
I can't believe someone tried to portray war again. How unpatriotic can Hollywood get?

"To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public." -- Theodore Roosevelt (1918)

"The danger to political dissent is acute where the Government attempts to act under so vague a concept as the power to protect "domestic security." Given the difficulty of defining the domestic security interest, the danger of abuse in acting to protect that interest becomes apparent. --U.S. Supreme Court decision (407 U.S. 297 (1972)

The Liberal Media At Work
An objective look at media partisanship
Re: Jarhead Sucks [message #178409 is a reply to message #178403] Tue, 08 November 2005 15:46 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Jecht is currently offline  Jecht
Messages: 3156
Registered: September 2004
Karma: 0
General (3 Stars)
haven't seen it. Won't bash it until I do.

http://img148.imageshack.us/img148/9146/hartyn4.png
Re: Jarhead Sucks [message #178474 is a reply to message #178403] Tue, 08 November 2005 23:28 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Dishman is currently offline  Dishman
Messages: 158
Registered: February 2003
Location: Chicago
Karma: 0
Recruit

i thought it was pretty cool, but just from an entertainment standpoint. They ripped a ton from full metal jacket (partly because it's the same corps) and a certain amount of surrealism from the likes of Apocalypse Now, though I like the way they changed the atmosphere near the oil wells. They also completely played off on the surplus of anti war crap being thrown all over the place. i'm definitely not saying that the thoughts and ideas of the transposed characters weren't legitimate and respectively truthful, but the whole marketing scheme was to attract that demographic of anti george bush people (i could tell that each young adult's hair on their neck stood up when that character said something about 'George Bush', but meaning senior, during a monologue about the government's motive). don't get me wrong, i don't like the war from a moral standpoint any more than the yuppy standing next to me, but i got respect for those men, and i don't like people tryin to fuck around with me and my position through big buck movies.

"God isn't on our side either, cuz he hates idiots also."

[Updated on: Tue, 08 November 2005 23:34]

Report message to a moderator

Re: Jarhead Sucks [message #179124 is a reply to message #178403] Mon, 14 November 2005 13:38 Go to previous messageGo to next message
SuperMidget is currently offline  SuperMidget
Messages: 465
Registered: November 2004
Location: Barrie, ON
Karma: 0
Commander
I've heard it's great.



Meh the world can never decide on anything.


http://img222.imageshack.us/img222/3971/knockknockboo4iy.gif
Wanna fight? www.hobowars.com
Bring it on...
Re: Jarhead Sucks [message #179130 is a reply to message #178403] Mon, 14 November 2005 13:52 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Hydra is currently offline  Hydra
Messages: 827
Registered: September 2003
Location: Atlanta, GA
Karma: 0
Colonel
I heard it was good; haven't seen it; I suspect that the entire thing is little more than an anti-war political message, though I still might see it.

Walter Keith Koester: September 22, 1962 - March 15, 2005
God be with you, Uncle Wally.
http://www.warriorforums.net/forums/images/warriorsforchrist/statusicon/forum_new.gif(<---New(ish) Prayer Group Forums)
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v632/venompawz/cross.gif(<---Archived Prayer Group Forums)
Re: Jarhead Sucks [message #179147 is a reply to message #178403] Mon, 14 November 2005 15:59 Go to previous messageGo to next message
warranto is currently offline  warranto
Messages: 2584
Registered: February 2003
Location: Alberta, Canada
Karma: 0
General (2 Stars)
the only concern I have is how accuate a portrayal of the military it is.
Re: Jarhead Sucks [message #179203 is a reply to message #179147] Mon, 14 November 2005 21:10 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Nodbugger is currently offline  Nodbugger
Messages: 976
Registered: February 2003
Karma: 0
Colonel
warranto wrote on Mon, 14 November 2005 17:59

the only concern I have is how accuate a portrayal of the military it is.



There aren't very many accurate portrayals.


http://www.n00bstories.com/image.fetch.php?id=1129285834
Re: Jarhead Sucks [message #179299 is a reply to message #178403] Tue, 15 November 2005 16:14 Go to previous messageGo to next message
SuperFlyingEngi is currently offline  SuperFlyingEngi
Messages: 1756
Registered: November 2003
Karma: 0
General (1 Star)
And we all know what Nodbugger means when he says accurate!

http://alcoreien.blogs.sapo.pt/arquivo/laughing.gif


"To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public." -- Theodore Roosevelt (1918)

"The danger to political dissent is acute where the Government attempts to act under so vague a concept as the power to protect "domestic security." Given the difficulty of defining the domestic security interest, the danger of abuse in acting to protect that interest becomes apparent. --U.S. Supreme Court decision (407 U.S. 297 (1972)

The Liberal Media At Work
An objective look at media partisanship

[Updated on: Tue, 15 November 2005 16:16]

Report message to a moderator

Re: Jarhead Sucks [message #179942 is a reply to message #178403] Sun, 20 November 2005 20:29 Go to previous message
luv2pb is currently offline  luv2pb
Messages: 1488
Registered: February 2004
Karma: 0
General (1 Star)
Not everything is as it appears
Untouchable
Ok, just got back from seeing the movie and I have to agree that it was "the suck".

N00bstories Director Of Operations
Previous Topic: Abortion [split]
Next Topic: Sylvia browne's predictions
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Mon Apr 29 02:14:18 MST 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.00803 seconds