|
|
| Should ACK be banned? [message #152583] |
Mon, 02 May 2005 21:17   |
 |
Crimson
Messages: 7427
Registered: February 2003
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Karma: 0
|
General (5 Stars)
ADMINISTRATOR |
|
|
| Sir Phoenixx |
| Quote: |
but this is so blatant favouritism that I couldn't resist trying to draw out this thread as long as possible.
|
Not in any way, shape, or form. For it to be favoritism she/them would have had to ban others or delete stuff from others while not doing the same to Aircraftkiller when he did something similar, and that has not happened.
| Quote: |
What do you have to do to get your self banned? What line do you have to cross?
|
Attacking the forum, flooding (new accounts, posts, etc.), bypassing security features and trying to do stuff that's not intended to be done (one was banned recently for including some html in his post that changed the background image of the forum for that thread), etc.
|
I'm glad someone is paying attention.
| IRON FART |
Does that mean I can come here, try to piss people off and be a menace?
|
Haven't you done that before? Or am I confusing you with someone else.
I'm the bawss.
|
|
|
|
| Should ACK be banned? [message #152588] |
Mon, 02 May 2005 21:33 |
 |
IRON FART
Messages: 1989
Registered: September 2003
Location: LOS ANGELES
Karma: 0
|
General (1 Star) |
|
|
Well at the time I was being a menace....Just like ACK....And do you remember what you did? You banned me.
But was I being a menace just because I felt like pissing people off? Not even. I downloaded cheats off a website whose domain was linked to you. THAT is why I was being a menace - and I got punished for voicing it out here. Wether there was any truth to it or not, I guess I will never know, but I apologized since for being a menace the way I was.
HOWEVER if you can't plainly see (or refuse to) that ACK is coming here only to be disruptive and be a menace, then that is favouritism because you refuse to do anything about it.
| Quote: |
Quote from IRC
<[Digital]> get man_fucking_a_car.mpg
<[Digital]> ah fuck wrong window
|
|
|
|
|
| Should ACK be banned? [message #152589] |
Mon, 02 May 2005 21:34 |
|
Crimson
Messages: 7427
Registered: February 2003
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Karma: 0
|
General (5 Stars)
ADMINISTRATOR |
|
|
Or maybe it's because once upon a time he WAS helpful and created more maps than anyone, and the most popular maps still played today?
I'm the bawss.
[Updated on: Mon, 02 May 2005 21:48] Report message to a moderator |
|
|
|
| Should ACK be banned? [message #152590] |
Mon, 02 May 2005 21:39 |
®
Messages: 26
Registered: April 2005
Karma: 0
|
Recruit |
|
|
Than*
Most popular maps played today? Maybe that's because he always shot down anything anyone else tried to do and told people their maps were crap. Who knows what some of those modders could have come up with had they not given up after the harrassment ack gave them. As for the most popular maps played today, of course the factory maps are the most popular played today. I'm afraid we'll never get any modded maps to trump them due to ack having been the only one to keep producing maps for the reasons stated above.
|
|
|
|
| Should ACK be banned? [message #152591] |
Mon, 02 May 2005 21:45 |
 |
Oblivion165
Messages: 3468
Registered: June 2003
Location: Hendersonville, North Car...
Karma: 0
|
General (3 Stars) |
|
|
| Crimson |
Or maybe it's because once upon a time he WAS helpful and created more maps that anyone, and the most popular maps still played today?
|
Once upon a time people admired Micheal Jackson.
Once upon a time before 1941, there were several million more jews.
Once upon a time Lucas was a good film maker.
Once upon a time "Hip-Hop" was (for the best) looked down upon.
Just because something used to be good, doesnt mean it should be allowed to happen/change.
EDIT: and no i dont mean MJ should be admired.
WOL: Ob165ion Skype: Oblivion165 Yahoo Instant Messenger: CaptainJohn165
|
|
|
|
| Should ACK be banned? [message #152593] |
Mon, 02 May 2005 22:03 |
|
Crimson
Messages: 7427
Registered: February 2003
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Karma: 0
|
General (5 Stars)
ADMINISTRATOR |
|
|
That's a horrible analogy... I don't think the way ACK acts is anything close to any of those.
I'm the bawss.
|
|
|
|
| Should ACK be banned? [message #152597] |
Mon, 02 May 2005 22:09 |
|
Oblivion165
Messages: 3468
Registered: June 2003
Location: Hendersonville, North Car...
Karma: 0
|
General (3 Stars) |
|
|
| Crimson |
That's a horrible analogy... I don't think the way ACK acts is anything close to any of those.
|
......that was not the point.
The point was that things change. Better or worse.
WOL: Ob165ion Skype: Oblivion165 Yahoo Instant Messenger: CaptainJohn165
|
|
|
|
| Should ACK be banned? [message #152599] |
Mon, 02 May 2005 22:10 |
|
Crimson
Messages: 7427
Registered: February 2003
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Karma: 0
|
General (5 Stars)
ADMINISTRATOR |
|
|
Well, whatever your point is, you still fail to convince me.
I'm the bawss.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Should ACK be banned? [message #152650] |
Tue, 03 May 2005 06:12 |
|
|
| IRON FART |
HOWEVER if you can't plainly see (or refuse to) that ACK is coming here only to be disruptive and be a menace, then that is favouritism because you refuse to do anything about it.
|
Nope, still not favoritism. Just because she's not doing anything to him, doesn't make it favoritism. Until she bans someone for being annoying, or acting similarly while Aircraftkiller is still acting the same and isn't banned, it isn't favoritism no matter how you try to spin it.
Since you're having trouble with the word, I'll explain it for you...
Favoritism: Person A, and Person B are both acting like asses, trying to start arguments, etc., but only Person B is banned because Person A is a friend of the Admin.
Not Favoritism: Person A is acting like an ass, trying to start arguments, etc., but he isn't banned.
Since there isn't another person doing the same thing that got banned, while Aircraftkiller didn't get banned, it can't be favoritism.
.:Red Alert: A Path Beyond Modeler:.
E-mail: sirphoenixx@gmail.com
AIM: Sir Phoenixx
ICQ: 339325768
MSN: sirphoenixx@hotmail.com
Yahoo: sirphoenix86
If anyone needs any help with using 3dsmax, or gmax feel free to contact me.
My Gallery: sir-phoenixx.deviantart.com/gallery
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Should ACK be banned? [message #152664] |
Tue, 03 May 2005 09:37 |
|
Crimson
Messages: 7427
Registered: February 2003
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Karma: 0
|
General (5 Stars)
ADMINISTRATOR |
|
|
I don't remember banning him. I thought he was banned once on Westwood's forums..
I'm the bawss.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Should ACK be banned? [message #152676] |
Tue, 03 May 2005 10:48 |
|
|
| Quote: |
Phoenix your definition sucks as much as ACK does
|
That's weird, because according to the dictionary, my explanation of it is completely correct.
| Dictionary.com |
fa·vor·it·ism
n.
1. A display of partiality toward a favored person or group.
2. The state of being held in special favor.
|
| Dictionary.com |
partiality
n
1: a predisposition to like something; "he had a fondness for whiskey" [syn: fondness, fancy] 2: an inclination to favor one group or view or opinion over alternatives
|
| Dictionary.com |
favored
adj 1: preferred above all others and treated with partiality; "the favored child"
|
Favoritism is to show preference of someone over someone else. Like I said, for it to be favoritism, she would have to ban others for doing what Aircraftkiller is doing while not banning him.
.:Red Alert: A Path Beyond Modeler:.
E-mail: sirphoenixx@gmail.com
AIM: Sir Phoenixx
ICQ: 339325768
MSN: sirphoenixx@hotmail.com
Yahoo: sirphoenix86
If anyone needs any help with using 3dsmax, or gmax feel free to contact me.
My Gallery: sir-phoenixx.deviantart.com/gallery
|
|
|
|
| Should ACK be banned? [message #152680] |
Tue, 03 May 2005 11:13 |
 |
bigejoe14
Messages: 1302
Registered: February 2003
Karma: 0
|
General (1 Star) |
|
|
I swear, you people are so fucking stupid. Sir Phoenixx has stated the definition of favoritism at least 5 different times, yet you still keep crying, and crying, and crying about how it's favoritism that's going on. Even though it's brutally obvious that it's not, you strive harder to get Aricraftkiller banned instead of actually trying to see past your blind rage that it's not favoritism.
WHATEVER, FAGGOT
[Updated on: Tue, 03 May 2005 11:23] Report message to a moderator |
|
|
|
| Should ACK be banned? [message #152681] |
Tue, 03 May 2005 11:16 |
|
|
| bigejoe14 |
I swear, you people are so fucking stupid. Sir Phoenixx has stated the definition of favoritism at least 5 different times, yet you still keep crying, and crying, and crying about how it's favoritism that's going on. Even though it's brutally obvious that it's not, you strive harder to get Aricraftkiller banned instead of actually trying to see past your blind rage that's it's not favoritism.
|
I agree completely. I'll also quote myself.
| j_ball430 |
This thread is completely pointless. Even if I agreed with banning him, this thread would STILL be pointless. Whether or not he should be banned, the fact is, he isn't going to be. Talking about this anymore just shows that you guy's can't drop a subject.
|
Libertarian Party | The King's Throne | The Soda Shop
|
|
|
|
| Should ACK be banned? [message #152682] |
Tue, 03 May 2005 11:35 |
The Mad Hatter
Messages: 37
Registered: March 2005
Karma: 0
|
Recruit |
|
|
| Quote: |
Renegade Alert sucks.
|
But it doesn't 
''Ah - there's nothing that makes you feel more alive than killing is there Smithers?''
|
|
|
|
|
|
Search
Help
Members
Register
Login
Home
