Home » General Discussions » General Discussion » Damn Counter Strike Source Hacker
|
|
| Damn Counter Strike Source Hacker [message #144564] |
Sat, 19 March 2005 15:52   |
 |
warranto
Messages: 2584
Registered: February 2003
Location: Alberta, Canada
Karma: 0
|
General (2 Stars) |
|
|
Kept this topic open: http://www.renforums.com/viewtopic.php?t=14204
Stated that aircraftkiller's continual correction of people's grammar, spelling, whatever was annoying. http://www.renforums.com/viewtopic.php?t=13936&postdays=0&postorder=asc&start=0
Remember, just because something seems to be in support of someone doesn't mean a biasedness towards them. As I said, I agre on the side of people who are in the right.
In regards to things like this, aircraftlkiller IS in the right. The correct way to spell Nod, is Nod and not NOD as it is not an accroym. The correct term IS texture and not skin, though skin is an acceptable SLANG term.
Calling someone on a one-time keyboarding error by attempting to use the same sort of imporper spelling arguement Aircraftkiller uses on people who do it continuously IS pathetic and laughable.
And just a little "for your information" bit to all here;
| Quote: |
The transition from World Wide Web site to Web site to website seems to have progressed as rapidly as the technology itself. The development of website as a single uncapitalized word mirrors the development of other technological expressions which have tended to evolve into unhyphenated forms as they become more familiar. Thus email has recently been gaining ground over the forms E-mail and e-mail, especially in texts that are more technologically oriented. Similarly, there has been an increasing preference for closed forms like homepage, online, and printout.
|
This is an instance where both terms have become acceptable as referring to the same thing, both being defined as a noun, with neither one being deemed a slang term. While it is true that Web site is more correct, unlike "texture" and "skin", website is considered to be a proper noun.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Damn Counter Strike Source Hacker [message #144598] |
Sat, 19 March 2005 17:16 |
z310
Messages: 2459
Registered: July 2003
Karma: 0
|
General (2 Stars) |
|
|
| msgtpain |
| z310 |
| warranto |
Come on people, digging this far down to find ammunition to use against him is pathetic and laughable.
|
|
Actually, what's "laughable" in my opinion is that some folks (forum moderators included, obviously) will look a blind eye as Ack pulls this exact same sort of topic derailing and flaming in 80% of the threads he posts in; then come jump to his defense when anyone does it back..
Bias? me thinks so..
|
That's who AK is. The other people only do it, you can say, to get even.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Damn Counter Strike Source Hacker [message #144616] |
Sat, 19 March 2005 19:31 |
msgtpain
Messages: 663
Registered: March 2003
Location: Montana
Karma: 0
|
Colonel |
|
|
| Javaxcx |
I'm not sure why you'd pick on Warranto for taking the side of someone who is technically correct (the best kind) over someone who is technically incorrect-- possibly because this person just so happens to be Aircraftkiller..
|
I'm not "picking" on warranto, I'm simply pointing out an observation which I've made and one that quite possibly, no one shares; but that doesn't mean I can't point it out, right?
| warranto |
simple solution. Ignore the derailment and continue with the topic.
I'm, perhaps the least biased person here. I simply argue in agreement with who's "in the right".
Amazing how in a forum based on the written word, people haven't gotten use to the idea of ignoring someone. It's completely simple. The post is there, but no one is demanding that you comment on it.
|
See here, I just have to wonder, if this is the solution, why was the person condemned as being "laughable and pathetic"? Why wasn't he simply ignored, and the main topic continued? But this is my point.. in most threads where Ack does this himself, the post is simply ignored. So, we either simply ignore it when others do it also, or risk appearing biased.
| Javaxcx |
Oh, and you're right. The proper term IS web site, not any variant thereof.
|
If we're talking "technically correct", than warranto didn't side with the correct person. Hasn't that always been the main consensus here? Sure it may be "accepted".. but that doesn't mean it's "correct".. Just because people have shortened it in to understandable slang, doesn't mean I can't correct them, or is that argument only valid when it supports specific people? More bias?
It's a Web site, running on a Web server, on the World Wide Web....
|
|
|
|
| Damn Counter Strike Source Hacker [message #144618] |
Sat, 19 March 2005 19:44 |
 |
Javaxcx
Messages: 1943
Registered: February 2003
Location: Canada, eh?
Karma: 0
|
General (1 Star) |
|
|
| msgtpain |
I'm not "picking" on warranto, I'm simply pointing out an observation which I've made and one that quite possibly, no one shares; but that doesn't mean I can't point it out, right?
|
As long it's only an observation and not something "biased".
| Quote: |
If we're talking "technically correct", than warranto didn't side with the correct person. Hasn't that always been the main consensus here? Sure it may be "accepted".. but that doesn't mean it's "correct".. Just because people have shortened it in to understandable slang, doesn't mean I can't correct them, or is that argument only valid when it supports specific people? More bias?
It's a Web site, running on a Web server, on the World Wide Web....
|
He should probably rephrase then. Siding with who he believes is correct and in the right, wouldn't you agree?
Sniper Extraordinaire
Read the FUD Rules before you come in and make an ass of yourself.
All your base are belong to us.
You have no chance to survive make your time.
|
|
|
|
| Damn Counter Strike Source Hacker [message #144624] |
Sat, 19 March 2005 20:40 |
|
warranto
Messages: 2584
Registered: February 2003
Location: Alberta, Canada
Karma: 0
|
General (2 Stars) |
|
|
| msgtpain |
| Javaxcx |
I'm not sure why you'd pick on Warranto for taking the side of someone who is technically correct (the best kind) over someone who is technically incorrect-- possibly because this person just so happens to be Aircraftkiller..
|
I'm not "picking" on warranto, I'm simply pointing out an observation which I've made and one that quite possibly, no one shares; but that doesn't mean I can't point it out, right?
| warranto |
simple solution. Ignore the derailment and continue with the topic.
I'm, perhaps the least biased person here. I simply argue in agreement with who's "in the right".
Amazing how in a forum based on the written word, people haven't gotten use to the idea of ignoring someone. It's completely simple. The post is there, but no one is demanding that you comment on it.
|
See here, I just have to wonder, if this is the solution, why was the person condemned as being "laughable and pathetic"? Why wasn't he simply ignored, and the main topic continued? But this is my point.. in most threads where Ack does this himself, the post is simply ignored. So, we either simply ignore it when others do it also, or risk appearing biased.
| Javaxcx |
Oh, and you're right. The proper term IS web site, not any variant thereof.
|
If we're talking "technically correct", than warranto didn't side with the correct person. Hasn't that always been the main consensus here? Sure it may be "accepted".. but that doesn't mean it's "correct".. Just because people have shortened it in to understandable slang, doesn't mean I can't correct them, or is that argument only valid when it supports specific people? More bias?
It's a Web site, running on a Web server, on the World Wide Web....
|
I concur; I don't believe you're picking on me either (just so this issue is cleared). Hence why I'm attempting to explain why I do what I do, rather than completely ignore it altogether.
Perhaps this "ignoring the post" idea should be explained better. Being able to ignore it doesn't mean it has to be ignored. completely ignorant posts such as the one that I commented on initially is one that I chose not to ignore, simply because of it's stupidity. The same goes for Aircraftkiller's idea that cheating on one game has no implication on being labeled a cheater if the initial accusation was based on a different game, and the subsequent irrelevant post to my comment later (more on that in a bit).
If someone does something that I feel is worthy of a response to correct it (in this type of circumstance, and not posting in general), I'll do it. I've completey stopped posting in regards to the generic Reborn insults, and most subsequent insults against Aircraftkiller simply because the entire thing has become old and predictable.
"Reborn sucks"
"random insult to Aircraftkiller"
rinse, wash and repeat.
The only time I've done it recently (I think) was when people started attacking the idea of texture being the proper word, which I then posted regarding only that.
In relation to who siding with whom, what I corrected was the idea of insulting someone based on a simple keyboarding error of missing the "b", not on whether it was one word or two (though as I pointed out earlier, both are now acceptable and interchangeable, etc.)
And Aircraftkiller: I never once said cheating in one game would lead to cheating in another. What I said was cheating in one game makes you as much of a cheater as cheating in another. Even more so when it occures on-line. And as such, makes DaveGmm's comment legitimate.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Damn Counter Strike Source Hacker [message #144645] |
Sat, 19 March 2005 22:26 |
 |
csskiller
Messages: 522
Registered: April 2004
Karma: 0
|
Colonel |
|
|
| Renx |
Go to the console and type status. Find the cheater, get steamID, ban.
I thought you could only change names once per round anyway, so it shouldn't be that hard.
I'm assuming you're using the mani admin mod too. If that's the case the admin menu isn't the only way to use its commands. Go into the console and type ma_help.
|
Yeah ok I'll try doing that.
Also I can't believe how a topic like this can go to shit so fast....... :rolleyes:
When history witnesses a great change, Razgriz reveals itself,
First as a dark demon,
As a demon it uses its power to reign death upon the land;
and then it dies.
However, after a period of slumber, Razgriz returns.
This time as a great hero...
|
|
|
|
| Damn Counter Strike Source Hacker [message #144674] |
Sun, 20 March 2005 04:35 |
 |
DaveGMM
Messages: 484
Registered: February 2003
Location: England, UK
Karma: 0
|
Commander |
|
|
| Aircraftkiller a.k.a. ACK |
So cheating in a Sega game on the Genesis as a kid means you're going to be prone to cheating forever? Some of us enjoy cheating in games we've already beaten.
|
I don't have an issue with people cheating on Sega games. You can Up-Select-Left-Right-Start-Down all you like on them, because that doesn't interfere with other people's playing. You're simply indicating that you can't beat the game without them.
Going onto Blackcell, whatever people's thinking of them was at the time, and cheating - something you (I believe) were vehemently opposed to - was not only pathetic, but crass.
Cheating in Renegade has everything to do with cheating in Counterstrike, but it's refreshing to see you on the defensive side for a change. You did something you thought was incredibly funny.. I daresay you really think you "assrammed" the BC servers with your little PT antics, but you've proved you're willing to cheat in one online game, and I'm only left to wonder which game'll be next.
So, who's it going to be, Jon? Who are you going to ruin the gaming experiance for now?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Sat May 11 00:26:13 MST 2024
Total time taken to generate the page: 0.01218 seconds
|
Search
Help
Members
Register
Login
Home
