|
|
| What the "left" thinks of the "red states&quo [message #132976] |
Tue, 18 January 2005 19:18   |
 |
SuperFlyingEngi
Messages: 1756
Registered: November 2003
Karma: 0
|
General (1 Star) |
|
|
Good one, ACK, you found a site that hosts about 6 pictures of actual questionable demonstration signs mixed in with a bunch of filler.
"To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public." -- Theodore Roosevelt (1918)
"The danger to political dissent is acute where the Government attempts to act under so vague a concept as the power to protect "domestic security." Given the difficulty of defining the domestic security interest, the danger of abuse in acting to protect that interest becomes apparent. --U.S. Supreme Court decision (407 U.S. 297 (1972)
The Liberal Media At Work
An objective look at media partisanship
|
|
|
|
|
|
| What the "left" thinks of the "red states&quo [message #132978] |
Tue, 18 January 2005 19:29 |
 |
Aircraftkiller
Messages: 8213
Registered: February 2003
Karma: 0
|
General (5 Stars) |
|
|
You're both idiots, I'll explain why.
SuperFlyingFungus: I count at least 13 images ranging from "oil pimp," inferring that the war was for oil, to "Bush = Hitler" and "Fuck middle America." That is not six, that's at least 13. In addition to burning a President Bush effigy, attempting to start a riot, and attacking police officers. You are an idiot, please try again.
Panther: This wasn't made to impress anyone, it was meant to show exactly what was shown. I put "left" in quotation marks to signal that I wasn't sure that these people even constituted the actual left section of society. They're beyond left, they're simply retarded and cannot think for themselves using the facts that are readily available. You are also an idiot, please try again... And since both of you are too stupid to write out the proper acronym for my name, I'll say it again. My name is not ack. It never has been ack, and never will be ack.
|
|
|
|
| What the "left" thinks of the "red states&quo [message #132981] |
Tue, 18 January 2005 19:32 |
|
SuperFlyingEngi
Messages: 1756
Registered: November 2003
Karma: 0
|
General (1 Star) |
|
|
| ACK |
SuperFlyingEngi: I count at least 13 images ranging from "oil pimp," inferring that the war was for oil, to "Bush = Hitler" and "Fuck middle America." That is not six, that's at least 13. In addition to burning a President Bush effigy, attempting to start a riot, and attacking police officers. You are an idiot, please try again.
|
Okay, 13. You win. 13 questionable signs. Out of what, thousands? And this cameraman was obviously hunting for the most controversial signs he could find.
And the site itself states that the group that started a riot and attacked the cops hated liberals just as much as Bush. The "black bloq" or something.
"To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public." -- Theodore Roosevelt (1918)
"The danger to political dissent is acute where the Government attempts to act under so vague a concept as the power to protect "domestic security." Given the difficulty of defining the domestic security interest, the danger of abuse in acting to protect that interest becomes apparent. --U.S. Supreme Court decision (407 U.S. 297 (1972)
The Liberal Media At Work
An objective look at media partisanship
|
|
|
|
| What the "left" thinks of the "red states&quo [message #132985] |
Tue, 18 January 2005 19:44 |
|
Aircraftkiller
Messages: 8213
Registered: February 2003
Karma: 0
|
General (5 Stars) |
|
|
Isn't that the point to find the most controversial thing possible and focus only on that? I mean it's only what you've done for the past year.
| Quote: |
I fell in with the "Black Bloq," a group of anarcho-fascists whose only goal is to commit violence and incite chaos. I marched with them for hours as they chanted, "Tonight, We're gonna, Fuck! Shit! Up!" and "Hey hey, Ho ho, this civilization's got to go!" and "Shoot Bush, not dope!" and "No Bush, No Kerry, Revolution's necessary."
|
Bzzt, wrong. They're anarchists, which falls on the liberal side of the fence.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| What the "left" thinks of the "red states&quo [message #132991] |
Tue, 18 January 2005 20:14 |
|
SuperFlyingEngi
Messages: 1756
Registered: November 2003
Karma: 0
|
General (1 Star) |
|
|
| Aircraftkiller |
Isn't that the point to find the most controversial thing possible and focus only on that? I mean it's only what you've done for the past year.
| Quote: |
I fell in with the "Black Bloq," a group of anarcho-fascists whose only goal is to commit violence and incite chaos. I marched with them for hours as they chanted, "Tonight, We're gonna, Fuck! Shit! Up!" and "Hey hey, Ho ho, this civilization's got to go!" and "Shoot Bush, not dope!" and "No Bush, No Kerry, Revolution's necessary."
|
Bzzt, wrong. They're anarchists, which falls on the liberal side of the fence.
|
Goldilocks, they're a group of crazed revolutionaries whose only relationship with anything Democrat is in the broadest definition of the word "liberal," namely, change.
And what's the point of this site? 13 people made rude signs? So what?
| ZomebieTime |
]The Black Bloq folks hate San Francisco's touchy-feely leftists as much as they hate George Bush.
|
They're probably on the Democratic payroll.
And do us all a favor and go see a barber.
"To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public." -- Theodore Roosevelt (1918)
"The danger to political dissent is acute where the Government attempts to act under so vague a concept as the power to protect "domestic security." Given the difficulty of defining the domestic security interest, the danger of abuse in acting to protect that interest becomes apparent. --U.S. Supreme Court decision (407 U.S. 297 (1972)
The Liberal Media At Work
An objective look at media partisanship
|
|
|
|
|
|
| What the "left" thinks of the "red states&quo [message #132993] |
Tue, 18 January 2005 20:21 |
|
SuperFlyingEngi
Messages: 1756
Registered: November 2003
Karma: 0
|
General (1 Star) |
|
|
You mean those 13 signs are prostrated by people like you who find the logical route of attack against an entire core of beliefs the personal thoughts of 13 different people? It's not like any of them are in positions of any political importance. They don't represent anyone else.
You want an actual riot? Look at the 2000 protest in front of the DNC. Rage Against the Machine really got the bloodlust into those conservative eyes. So much so the police had to come in and rubber bullet everyone. Rent Live at the Grand Olympic Auditorium sometime and see for yourself. It's one of the special features.
The concert itself is quite good, as well.
"To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public." -- Theodore Roosevelt (1918)
"The danger to political dissent is acute where the Government attempts to act under so vague a concept as the power to protect "domestic security." Given the difficulty of defining the domestic security interest, the danger of abuse in acting to protect that interest becomes apparent. --U.S. Supreme Court decision (407 U.S. 297 (1972)
The Liberal Media At Work
An objective look at media partisanship
|
|
|
|
| What the "left" thinks of the "red states&quo [message #132995] |
Tue, 18 January 2005 20:23 |
|
|
I'm sure that person's extremely patriotic, eh? "IN ORDER TO SUPPORT OUR COUNTRY, LET'S ABANDON IT!" I love it how liberals say that they're patriotic and love their country, but yet no sooner than they say that, they're ready to pack their bags and get the fuck out. If you love your country, you stick with it tthrough thick and thin. Take the good with the bad. This goes to conservatives too. They'd act the same exact way, and it's just fucking pathetic. I love my country, but now I want to leave! Yes, sir, I'm proud to be a fellow American with you!
Now, I suppose you're going to quote Thomas Jefferson again, eh, Tool?
Libertarian Party | The King's Throne | The Soda Shop
|
|
|
|
| What the "left" thinks of the "red states&quo [message #132996] |
Tue, 18 January 2005 20:24 |
 |
IRON FART
Messages: 1989
Registered: September 2003
Location: LOS ANGELES
Karma: 0
|
General (1 Star) |
|
|
| Aircraftkiller |
You're both idiots, I'll explain why.
SuperFlyingFungus: I count at least 13 images ranging from "oil pimp," inferring that the war was for oil, to "Bush = Hitler" and "Fuck middle America." That is not six, that's at least 13. In addition to burning a President Bush effigy, attempting to start a riot, and attacking police officers.
|
14. You missed this one
| Quote: |
Quote from IRC
<[Digital]> get man_fucking_a_car.mpg
<[Digital]> ah fuck wrong window
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| What the "left" thinks of the "red states&quo [message #132998] |
Tue, 18 January 2005 20:29 |
|
SuperFlyingEngi
Messages: 1756
Registered: November 2003
Karma: 0
|
General (1 Star) |
|
|
| j_ball430 |
I'm sure that person's extremely patriotic, eh? "IN ORDER TO SUPPORT OUR COUNTRY, LET'S ABANDON IT!" I love it how liberals say that they're patriotic and love their country, but yet no sooner than they say that, they're ready to pack their bags and get the fuck out. If you love your country, you stick with it tthrough thick and thin. Take the good with the bad. This goes to conservatives too. They'd act the same exact way, and it's just fucking pathetic. I love my country, but now I want to leave! Yes, sir, I'm proud to be a fellow American with you!
|
You're contrasting the words of few with the thoughts of many. But then again, that's all you can do.
"To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public." -- Theodore Roosevelt (1918)
"The danger to political dissent is acute where the Government attempts to act under so vague a concept as the power to protect "domestic security." Given the difficulty of defining the domestic security interest, the danger of abuse in acting to protect that interest becomes apparent. --U.S. Supreme Court decision (407 U.S. 297 (1972)
The Liberal Media At Work
An objective look at media partisanship
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| What the "left" thinks of the "red states&quo [message #133005] |
Tue, 18 January 2005 21:20 |
|
|
| SEAL |
If most "liberals" wanted to leave, they would have been in Canada by now. Aircraftkiller, thanks for showing us Anarchist protesters and labeling them as "liberals," you really added something substantial here. :rolleyes:
|
Did you not see me mentioning Conservatives as well? Of course not, then you wouldn't have an argument. Also, I never said most. Though, I did say "liberals", that's a mistake on my part.
Libertarian Party | The King's Throne | The Soda Shop
|
|
|
|
|
|
| What the "left" thinks of the "red states&quo [message #133014] |
Tue, 18 January 2005 23:48 |
|
IRON FART
Messages: 1989
Registered: September 2003
Location: LOS ANGELES
Karma: 0
|
General (1 Star) |
|
|
Yea they aren't all anarchists. It began as a peaceful protest, and then the american Nazi party decided to show up.
I'm going to keep an eye on Bush's inauguration. My sister thinks there are going to be big protests.
| Quote: |
Quote from IRC
<[Digital]> get man_fucking_a_car.mpg
<[Digital]> ah fuck wrong window
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| What the "left" thinks of the "red states&quo [message #133087] |
Wed, 19 January 2005 16:07 |
|
IRON FART
Messages: 1989
Registered: September 2003
Location: LOS ANGELES
Karma: 0
|
General (1 Star) |
|
|
I should really give you a slapping just for saying that, moron.
All of the protests supporting th Civil Rights movement were "just a bunch of people in denial."
May I ask when the last time you saw protests at an inauguration was? I want to see if there are going to be any protests even. I want to observe whats going on. According to the forefathers, a good American citizen will try to educate themselves about politics and national affairs. Does that sound like entertainment?
Shove your assumptions that I want to watch the inauguration for entertainment purposes up your ass, where they belong and where they came from.
| Quote: |
Quote from IRC
<[Digital]> get man_fucking_a_car.mpg
<[Digital]> ah fuck wrong window
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Search
Help
Members
Register
Login
Home
