|
|
| Do You Think Fighting For President Bush Is Worth Your Life? [message #156200] |
Tue, 24 May 2005 13:32   |
 |
glyde51
Messages: 1827
Registered: August 2004
Location: Winnipeg
Karma: 0
|
General (1 Star) |
|
|
No, we want to see Osama dead, who carried out attacks on the US. We went into Saddam for WMDs, but did we get them? I think not. Afganistan was a cover for going into Iraq, the reasons we went to Iraq were not humanitarian based, the US likes it money.
No. Seriously. No.
|
|
|
|
| Do You Think Fighting For President Bush Is Worth Your Life? [message #156204] |
Tue, 24 May 2005 13:49 |
|
|
How the fuck do you get money from a war? If I'm not mistaken, wars COST money. If we were greedy, we'd just export to other nations, refuse to import, and keep ourselves locked into an Isolationistic way of life. Obviously, this isn't the case.
Sure, there's always something to gain. We're expanding the free world. Giving more people the ability to have the freedoms that we have. How would you like to disagree with your government, and then be put to death because even one of your own family members snitched on you? I'm sure you would just love that. :rolleyes:
Where else would we go to get Osama? Oh yes, let's hunt down Osama in China! He's obviously not in Afghanistan where we originally thought. :rolleyes:
Libertarian Party | The King's Throne | The Soda Shop
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Do You Think Fighting For President Bush Is Worth Your Life? [message #156206] |
Tue, 24 May 2005 13:55 |
|
glyde51
Messages: 1827
Registered: August 2004
Location: Winnipeg
Karma: 0
|
General (1 Star) |
|
|
| j_ball430 |
How the fuck do you get money from a war? If I'm not mistaken, wars COST money. If we were greedy, we'd just export to other nations, refuse to import, and keep ourselves locked into an Isolationistic way of life. Obviously, this isn't the case.
Sure, there's always something to gain. We're expanding the free world. Giving more people the ability to have the freedoms that we have. How would you like to disagree with your government, and then be put to death because even one of your own family members snitched on you? I'm sure you would just love that. :rolleyes:
Where else would we go to get Osama? Oh yes, let's hunt down Osama in China! He's obviously not in Afghanistan where we originally thought. :rolleyes:
|
He's in Canadian Parlament! HELP US!
No. Seriously. No.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Do You Think Fighting For President Bush Is Worth Your Life? [message #156208] |
Tue, 24 May 2005 14:00 |
 |
warranto
Messages: 2584
Registered: February 2003
Location: Alberta, Canada
Karma: 0
|
General (2 Stars) |
|
|
| cowmisfit |
| warranto |
lol, nice try. "It doesn't deserve an answer", or would that be better stated "I have no answer to supply"?
Saddam did not carry out or order the attack on the World Trade Center. Yet, you seem to want to use this as a reason for fighting in Iraq...
|
I think this sums your comment up pretty good
"ReyDeLaGuerra: he's just a liberal"
That would be your an idiot. Ossama Bin Ladan ordered the murder and had those below him plan details and carry it out. I edited it and re-stated what i said. We are after ALL inloved. Those who carried it out, defended those who plotted it those who harbor them and those who support them in they're attack on innocentce.
Its the war on terrorisim, not the war on Ossama. You liberals tend to forget that,
|
Correct, Osama did. So I fail to see why you stated that Iraq had something to do with 9/11 when, even by your own admission, they didn't? The topic had been started to deal with the war in Iraq, so the only reason to bring in 9/11 as a defence for it would be that you think Saddam had something to do with 9/11.
Interesting how you seem to lable me a "liberal" as some sort of insult. Perhaps you should learn hat liberal means first. Of course, if you want to throw words-as-insults around, you seem to be the one whose mind is broad enough to encompass open ideas of what constitutes participation, with ideals of reform and progress on the terrorist front for the betterment of all. I'd say if anyone qualifies to be called "liberal", it would be you.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Do You Think Fighting For President Bush Is Worth Your Life? [message #156232] |
Tue, 24 May 2005 16:05 |
 |
SuperFlyingEngi
Messages: 1756
Registered: November 2003
Karma: 0
|
General (1 Star) |
|
|
| Doitle |
Civil war is inevitable if fucks like Newsweek keep screwing everything up. It's damn hard to try to help a country when every liberal world wide is trying his damndest to get us blown up! You don't want to see that 20 more american soldiers died in a suicide TP-ing attack, stop giving them a reason. They get coverage world wide attacking what all the fucking news channels portay as Satanerica. "The Associated Press has received reports tuesday that President Bush actually flayed several Iraqi babies while he was on vacation there making poor people fight to their deaths for the right to be punched in the face." For gods sake why do you think they hate us?
|
Please. That Newsweek story has been circulating for a year and a half in the Middle East. Their running of that story in no way caused a riot.
| bigjoe |
Still refuse to believe that all terrorist activities are coming from outside of Iraq and not inside? I see. I didn't know the Iraqi's enjoyed killing themselves.
|
The concept of rival clans vying for internal power seems entirely foreign to you. Have you never taken a high school history course?
| bigjoe |
Is it even possible for you to not discuss complications that are nearly a year old? If any of the RDx is used it will be from terrorists coming from the surrounding areas outside of Iraq, not inside. Being "U.N" regulated" never made the RDx any more safer than it was after we secured Iraq.
|
Well, actually it was safer, because all the RDx was under IAEA seal and frequently inspected. After the U.N. left Iraq preceding the U.S. invasion, al Qaqaa was not guarded. And the U.S. never came back and guarded it. The entire facility has since been stripped to the ground, and everything inside taken. Now there's so much RDx around Iraq that anyone can make a roadside bomb of devastating force. RDx is give or take the most powerful conventional explosive known to man. And Bush took no steps AT ALL to protect it.
| bigjoe |
You keep using the same dumbfounded excuses you used well over a year ago. Care to think of something new?
|
RDx won't go away if we give it time.
| cowmisfit |
That you idiot, is worth dying for.
|
I take it you'll be enlisting in the army as soon as you're legally able to?
| Doitle |
It's an allegory Kinghigh. I am the US, Nodbugger is the Iraqi people, and SFE is the liberal media. How could you miss that?
|
Actually, it was a bit spastic, if you didn't notice.
Cowmisfit - Saddam is not Osama
| cowmisfit |
A) Harbor , its clear he harbors terrorist. (No i won't give you proof, no its nto because i don't have an answer i just don't think you deserve my time to look it up and prove something thats right there for all the world to see and something anyone with any sense would confirm.)
|
Can't run with the big kids if you don't have any proof. [applies for B&C, too, although I won't directly contest the gassing of the Kurds.] [Because that's what UN sanctions are for]
| cowmisfit |
Its the war on terrorisim, not the war on Ossama.
|
If it were the "War on terrorism", you could use that justification to attack any Asian country. Why Iraq?
| jball |
How the fuck do you get money from a war?
|
By cutting taxes. Duuuuuuuuuuuuh.
"To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public." -- Theodore Roosevelt (1918)
"The danger to political dissent is acute where the Government attempts to act under so vague a concept as the power to protect "domestic security." Given the difficulty of defining the domestic security interest, the danger of abuse in acting to protect that interest becomes apparent. --U.S. Supreme Court decision (407 U.S. 297 (1972)
The Liberal Media At Work
An objective look at media partisanship
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Do You Think Fighting For President Bush Is Worth Your Life? [message #156248] |
Tue, 24 May 2005 16:49 |
|
SuperFlyingEngi
Messages: 1756
Registered: November 2003
Karma: 0
|
General (1 Star) |
|
|
You didn't really miss my sarcasm, did you?
And if unless I'm mistaken, he [you] was referring to running a profit during a war.
"To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public." -- Theodore Roosevelt (1918)
"The danger to political dissent is acute where the Government attempts to act under so vague a concept as the power to protect "domestic security." Given the difficulty of defining the domestic security interest, the danger of abuse in acting to protect that interest becomes apparent. --U.S. Supreme Court decision (407 U.S. 297 (1972)
The Liberal Media At Work
An objective look at media partisanship
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Do You Think Fighting For President Bush Is Worth Your Life? [message #156308] |
Wed, 25 May 2005 00:29 |
 |
bigejoe14
Messages: 1302
Registered: February 2003
Karma: 0
|
General (1 Star) |
|
|
| Quote: |
The concept of rival clans vying for internal power seems entirely foreign to you. Have you never taken a high school history course?
|
If any "rival clans" try to fight for the control of Iraq, they will come from the surrounding countries around Iraq. That's not really Civil War. Everything has been pretty damn nice within Iraq and it's citizens. The terrorist from the outside are the ones mucking it up for everyone else.
| Quote: |
Now there's so much RDx around Iraq that anyone can make a roadside bomb of devastating force.
|
How would you know it's in Iraq? It could be inside Iran, Cuba, or Russia for all you know.
| Quote: |
And Bush took no steps AT ALL to protect it.
|
Sorta like how Clinton sold U.S. Military intelligence to China to get campaign funds?
| Quote: |
RDx won't go away if we give it time.
|
Another excuse. If you're so worried about some crappy explosives, care to tell how you would like to take care of it?
| Quote: |
Please. That Newsweek story has been circulating for a year and a half in the Middle East. Their running of that story in no way caused a riot.
|
Bullshit, You know that story caused all that violence. You're just trying to defend your liberal spin machine. Who cares if it's been running for a year? It still caused all kinds of problems. Newsweek published that story with no conformation whatsoever. A stupid move that cost innocent lives. I cannot believe you're trying to defend that peice of crap.
WHATEVER, FAGGOT
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Search
Help
Members
Register
Login
Home
