Renegade Public Forums
C&C: Renegade --> Dying since 2003™, resurrected in 2024!
Home » General Discussions » Heated Discussions and Debates » Debate on Altruism.
Debate on Altruism. [message #371463] Tue, 10 February 2009 14:55 Go to next message
cheesesoda is currently offline  cheesesoda
Messages: 6507
Registered: March 2003
Location: Jackson, Michigan
Karma: 0
General (5 Stars)

Altruism does not and cannot exist. Period.

whoa.
Re: Racism [message #371477 is a reply to message #371463] Tue, 10 February 2009 16:07 Go to previous messageGo to next message
GEORGE ZIMMER is currently offline  GEORGE ZIMMER
Messages: 2605
Registered: March 2006
Karma: 0
General (2 Stars)
cheesesoda wrote on Tue, 10 February 2009 15:55

Altruism does not and cannot exist. Period.

I disagree. It just cannot exist amongst everyone.


Toggle Spoiler
Re: Racism [message #371483 is a reply to message #371477] Tue, 10 February 2009 16:59 Go to previous messageGo to next message
cheesesoda is currently offline  cheesesoda
Messages: 6507
Registered: March 2003
Location: Jackson, Michigan
Karma: 0
General (5 Stars)

Cabal8616 wrote on Tue, 10 February 2009 18:07

cheesesoda wrote on Tue, 10 February 2009 15:55

Altruism does not and cannot exist. Period.

I disagree. It just cannot exist amongst everyone.


1. the principle or practice of unselfish concern for or devotion to the welfare of others.

Not possible. When you get down to the bare reasoning as to why you're practicing "unselfish concern", it's purely egotistical. Even if you're doing something you HATE for someone you HATE, you aren't showing "unselfish concern". You are doing it in hopes that the favor is returned, thus having a selfish motive.

Altruism does not and cannot exist.


whoa.
Re: Racism [message #371484 is a reply to message #371483] Tue, 10 February 2009 17:09 Go to previous messageGo to next message
GEORGE ZIMMER is currently offline  GEORGE ZIMMER
Messages: 2605
Registered: March 2006
Karma: 0
General (2 Stars)
cheesesoda wrote on Tue, 10 February 2009 17:59

Cabal8616 wrote on Tue, 10 February 2009 18:07

cheesesoda wrote on Tue, 10 February 2009 15:55

Altruism does not and cannot exist. Period.

I disagree. It just cannot exist amongst everyone.


1. the principle or practice of unselfish concern for or devotion to the welfare of others.

Not possible. When you get down to the bare reasoning as to why you're practicing "unselfish concern", it's purely egotistical. Even if you're doing something you HATE for someone you HATE, you aren't showing "unselfish concern". You are doing it in hopes that the favor is returned, thus having a selfish motive.

Altruism does not and cannot exist.

It's quite possible to do it for both out of concern for others, and yes, so the favor would be returned. To sort of make a mutual trust and friendship with someone else, or atleast in hopes of it.


Toggle Spoiler
Re: Racism [message #371496 is a reply to message #371463] Tue, 10 February 2009 18:50 Go to previous messageGo to next message
cheesesoda is currently offline  cheesesoda
Messages: 6507
Registered: March 2003
Location: Jackson, Michigan
Karma: 0
General (5 Stars)

Then, you're not doing it out of altruism. You're doing it, so that it benefits you in some way.

whoa.
Re: Racism [message #371503 is a reply to message #371496] Tue, 10 February 2009 19:29 Go to previous messageGo to next message
u6795 is currently offline  u6795
Messages: 1261
Registered: March 2006
Location: Maryland
Karma: 0
General (1 Star)
cheesesoda wrote on Tue, 10 February 2009 20:50

Then, you're not doing it out of altruism. You're doing it, so that it benefits you in some way.

BUT LOL JEEZUS DIDN WANT NUTHIN IN RETURN!


yeah
Re: Racism [message #371505 is a reply to message #371503] Tue, 10 February 2009 19:43 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Ethenal is currently offline  Ethenal
Messages: 2532
Registered: January 2007
Location: US of A
Karma: 0
General (2 Stars)

u6795 wrote on Tue, 10 February 2009 20:29

cheesesoda wrote on Tue, 10 February 2009 20:50

Then, you're not doing it out of altruism. You're doing it, so that it benefits you in some way.

BUT LOL JEEZUS DIDN WANT NUTHIN IN RETURN!

You sir, are and idiot =)


-TLS-DJ-EYE-K wrote on Mon, 18 March 2013 07:29

Instead of showing us that u aren't more inteligent than a Toast, maybe you should start becomming good in renegade Thumbs Up

Re: Racism [message #371515 is a reply to message #371483] Tue, 10 February 2009 20:42 Go to previous messageGo to next message
R315r4z0r is currently offline  R315r4z0r
Messages: 3836
Registered: March 2005
Location: New York
Karma: 0
General (3 Stars)
cheesesoda wrote on Tue, 10 February 2009 18:59

Cabal8616 wrote on Tue, 10 February 2009 18:07

cheesesoda wrote on Tue, 10 February 2009 15:55

Altruism does not and cannot exist. Period.

I disagree. It just cannot exist amongst everyone.


1. the principle or practice of unselfish concern for or devotion to the welfare of others.

Not possible. When you get down to the bare reasoning as to why you're practicing "unselfish concern", it's purely egotistical. Even if you're doing something you HATE for someone you HATE, you aren't showing "unselfish concern". You are doing it in hopes that the favor is returned, thus having a selfish motive.

Altruism does not and cannot exist.

I can't agree with this. Although I somewhat agree with your statement, your point is easily contradicted.

I actually spent like 20 min writing a post explaining why I think that, but it turned out making it seem like I was promoting myself too much (and no, I don't think I'm a selfless person). I ended up turning it into a personal assessment of myself... and as such I didn't think anyone would be interested in reading it. :V
Re: Racism [message #371523 is a reply to message #371515] Tue, 10 February 2009 23:26 Go to previous messageGo to next message
z310
Messages: 2459
Registered: July 2003
Karma: 0
General (2 Stars)
Say you unselfishly help others. Is that rational? Does it make sense to help somebody with no personal gain? If you deny altruism's impossibility, can you justify regarding action?

[Updated on: Wed, 11 February 2009 04:21]

Report message to a moderator

Re: Racism [message #371530 is a reply to message #371463] Wed, 11 February 2009 01:37 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Ma1kel is currently offline  Ma1kel
Messages: 956
Registered: July 2005
Location: Kingdom of the Netherland...
Karma: 0
Colonel
its common decency bro

Re: Racism [message #371535 is a reply to message #371463] Wed, 11 February 2009 02:45 Go to previous messageGo to next message
SSADMVR is currently offline  SSADMVR
Messages: 274
Registered: June 2006
Karma: 0
Recruit
Humans naturally do not care about the wellbeing of people they don´t know. Therefore, everyone is selfish. Wether it´s doing volunteers work to calm your conscious, give you some self fulfillment or even bragging rights. Even simply expressing compassion for people you don´t know because society says it´s the right thing to do. You´re always doing it for yourself. Even when I´m typing this post to deliver you all some truth, I´m doing it so I can feel superior to all you dumbasses.
Re: Racism [message #371537 is a reply to message #371463] Wed, 11 February 2009 03:12 Go to previous messageGo to next message
z310
Messages: 2459
Registered: July 2003
Karma: 0
General (2 Stars)
By partaking in such common decency, one can fit in, gain respect, gain reputation, and feel good about him- or herself. Performing an action for those selfish reasons, with or without being aware of it, makes sense. Performing an action with no personal satisfaction and thus no reasonings does not make sense.
Re: Racism [message #371544 is a reply to message #371537] Wed, 11 February 2009 04:26 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Goztow is currently offline  Goztow
Messages: 9729
Registered: March 2005
Location: Belgium
Karma: 13
General (5 Stars)
Goztoe
z310 wrote on Wed, 11 February 2009 11:12

By partaking in such common decency, one can fit in, gain respect, gain reputation, and feel good about him- or herself. Performing an action for those selfish reasons, with or without being aware of it, makes sense. Performing an action with no personal satisfaction and thus no reasonings does not make sense.


This doesn't make it less noble. The very fact that you value respect enough to do things to gain it, seems a very noble way of living IMO.


You can find me in The KOSs2 (TK2) discord while I'm playing. Feel free to come and say hi! TK2 discord
Re: Debate on Altruism. [message #371559 is a reply to message #371463] Wed, 11 February 2009 06:30 Go to previous messageGo to next message
cheesesoda is currently offline  cheesesoda
Messages: 6507
Registered: March 2003
Location: Jackson, Michigan
Karma: 0
General (5 Stars)

Nobody's saying that egoism can't be noble. Egoism isn't saying, "everybody is selfish and evil". All egoism says is that people do things for their own benefit and nothing can be done altruistically.

Egoism is far from a bad thing. It's a good thing. It's why humans have developed it. It's not a flaw like a lot of idiots like to think. The entire reason why animals survive.


whoa.
Re: Racism [message #371568 is a reply to message #371483] Wed, 11 February 2009 07:24 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Spoony is currently offline  Spoony
Messages: 3915
Registered: January 2006
Karma: 0
General (3 Stars)
Tactics & Strategies Moderator
cheesesoda wrote on Tue, 10 February 2009 17:59

Cabal8616 wrote on Tue, 10 February 2009 18:07

cheesesoda wrote on Tue, 10 February 2009 15:55

Altruism does not and cannot exist. Period.

I disagree. It just cannot exist amongst everyone.


1. the principle or practice of unselfish concern for or devotion to the welfare of others.

Not possible. When you get down to the bare reasoning as to why you're practicing "unselfish concern", it's purely egotistical. Even if you're doing something you HATE for someone you HATE, you aren't showing "unselfish concern". You are doing it in hopes that the favor is returned, thus having a selfish motive.

Altruism does not and cannot exist.

What about charitable donations that are done anonymously? For example, my father made a pretty substantial donation to a charity after the Boxing Day tsunami a few years back. It can't have been to show what a nice guy he was because he didn't tell anybody about it - including our family (I just found the thankyou letter when I was helping him clear out the garage recently). The only plausible argument that that could've been 'selfish' was that it might have made him feel good, but he could've spent the money doing something which he certainly would've enjoyed more.

Another example, my league admin work. I'm not really talking about Renegade here, but at CW I was the admin of quite a few leagues and I didn't tell anybody about it. That wasn't to feel good either, it was pretty damn annoying sometimes.


Unleash the Renerageâ„¢

Renedrama [ren-i-drah-muh]
- noun
1. the inevitable criticism one receives after doing something awful
Re: Debate on Altruism. [message #371571 is a reply to message #371463] Wed, 11 February 2009 07:30 Go to previous messageGo to next message
cheesesoda is currently offline  cheesesoda
Messages: 6507
Registered: March 2003
Location: Jackson, Michigan
Karma: 0
General (5 Stars)

Oh, give me a break. You cannot possibly think those are two examples of altruism.

Doing something for the good of others and not expecting anything in return still gives someone something in return. A sense of accomplishment, a civic duty fulfilled, or just the joy of giving.

Just because something could have been done instead doesn't change the fact that some benefit was gained. It makes it less practical, maybe, but not altruistic.


whoa.
Re: Debate on Altruism. [message #371577 is a reply to message #371463] Wed, 11 February 2009 08:04 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Herr Surth is currently offline  Herr Surth
Messages: 1684
Registered: July 2007
Karma: 0
General (1 Star)
you're wrong.

thats about how much thought i spent onto this.
Re: Debate on Altruism. [message #371589 is a reply to message #371463] Wed, 11 February 2009 09:02 Go to previous messageGo to next message
SSADMVR is currently offline  SSADMVR
Messages: 274
Registered: June 2006
Karma: 0
Recruit
I don't normally say this, but cheesesoda is right.
Re: Racism [message #371600 is a reply to message #371535] Wed, 11 February 2009 09:36 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Starbuzz is currently offline  Starbuzz
Messages: 2487
Registered: May 2007
Karma: 2
General (2 Stars)
It is biologically impossible.

buzzsigfinal
Re: Racism [message #371604 is a reply to message #371523] Wed, 11 February 2009 09:47 Go to previous messageGo to next message
R315r4z0r is currently offline  R315r4z0r
Messages: 3836
Registered: March 2005
Location: New York
Karma: 0
General (3 Stars)
So what you are saying is that there is always a reason behind someone's actions, good or bad, beneficial to them or otherwise?

What if the only reasoning was to make it easier for someone else? Regardless if it makes it easier or harder for yourself?

[Updated on: Wed, 11 February 2009 09:57]

Report message to a moderator

Re: Debate on Altruism. [message #371610 is a reply to message #371463] Wed, 11 February 2009 10:50 Go to previous messageGo to next message
cheesesoda is currently offline  cheesesoda
Messages: 6507
Registered: March 2003
Location: Jackson, Michigan
Karma: 0
General (5 Stars)

You're still deriving pleasure from it in some form. Like I said above, it makes you feel a sense of accomplishment, you like the feeling of helping someone knowing you made their day/year/life, etc...

whoa.
Re: Debate on Altruism. [message #371611 is a reply to message #371463] Wed, 11 February 2009 10:52 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Herr Surth is currently offline  Herr Surth
Messages: 1684
Registered: July 2007
Karma: 0
General (1 Star)
What if I dont derive pleasure or accomplishment from it?

also, what are you even trying to prove with this thread?

edit@starbuzz: okay, "what are you even trying to prove with this post?" then. happy now? ;P

[Updated on: Wed, 11 February 2009 11:20]

Report message to a moderator

Re: Debate on Altruism. [message #371614 is a reply to message #371611] Wed, 11 February 2009 11:14 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Starbuzz is currently offline  Starbuzz
Messages: 2487
Registered: May 2007
Karma: 2
General (2 Stars)
Frontier Psychiatrist wrote on Wed, 11 February 2009 11:52

also, what are you even trying to prove with this thread?


AFAIK, he did not create this thread.


buzzsigfinal

[Updated on: Wed, 11 February 2009 11:16]

Report message to a moderator

Re: Debate on Altruism. [message #371615 is a reply to message #371610] Wed, 11 February 2009 11:27 Go to previous messageGo to next message
R315r4z0r is currently offline  R315r4z0r
Messages: 3836
Registered: March 2005
Location: New York
Karma: 0
General (3 Stars)
cheesesoda wrote on Wed, 11 February 2009 12:50

You're still deriving pleasure from it in some form. Like I said above, it makes you feel a sense of accomplishment, you like the feeling of helping someone knowing you made their day/year/life, etc...

No, I just said:
"Regardless if it makes your life easier or harder."

Meaning regardless of your own feelings in the matter.

To reiterate: What if you do something to make life easier for someone else, regardless of your own feelings and regardless if it makes your life easier or harder.

Like acting as if it was second nature. Having no ulterior motive to do it other than to do it? Having no intention of helping anyone nor having any intention of accomplishing anything?

Why do you keep on talking as if doing something for the sake of someone else is some chore you have to go out of your way to do?
Re: Debate on Altruism. [message #371629 is a reply to message #371463] Wed, 11 February 2009 12:56 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
Ryu is currently offline  Ryu
Messages: 2833
Registered: September 2006
Location: Liverpool, England.
Karma: 0
General (2 Stars)

cheesesoda wrote on Tue, 10 February 2009 21:55

Altruism does not and cannot exist. Period.


You just proved it existed, idiot. Razz


Presence is a curious thing, if you think you need to prove it... you probably never had it in the first place.
Previous Topic: Racism
Next Topic: What is the opposite of pain?
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Mon Jun 10 23:35:03 MST 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.01797 seconds