Home » Renegade Discussions » Mod Release Forum » [SKINS] SB Nod Apache
|
|
| Re: [SKINS] SB Nod Apache [message #384251 is a reply to message #384234] |
Mon, 04 May 2009 10:19   |
 |
Starbuzzz
Messages: 1637
Registered: June 2008
Karma: 0
|
General (1 Star) |
|
|
Goobers,
I will say it nicely.
In your eyes the SS was not proof. But server owners are NOT going to take a risk. You have to understand it from a server owner's perspective.
If they do what you are saying...that is, if they wait for FURTHER PROOF (like as if the SS was not enough proof already), then they stand a great risk of said player using cheats in one of their games ruining it for EVERYONE and also having a chance of escaping without getting caught.
It's like catching a well-armed suicide bomber before he even had a chance to blow himself up. Are you going to argue that there is NO PROOF he was going to blow himself up? Hey, what we are saying is, we caught a suicide bomber, he was wearing shitloads of bombs all over him and we are not going to release the fucker from our maximum security prison.
And what YOU are saying to get him released is: NO, he had the bombs all over his body BUT there was NO proof he was going to blow himself up. You gotta understand, Queen's screenshot EQUALS the suicide bomber's bombs. Server owners will not see it any other way; in other words, they are not going to agree to release the suicide bomber and WAIT for him to blow himself up. Once you see and understand this analogy, you will see why nobody is caring about what you say and why it is quite pointless of you to keep posting to get Queen unbanned from most servers.
And to make matters worse, Queen's constant story changing regarding the origins of the SS did not help AT ALL.
So, the server owners here have a more valid and legitimate cause to stick to their decisions than to listen to your argument.
|
|
|
|
| Re: [SKINS] SB Nod Apache [message #384258 is a reply to message #384251] |
Mon, 04 May 2009 11:25 |
Reaver11
Messages: 886
Registered: April 2007
Karma: 0
|
Colonel |
|
|
| Starbuck wrote on Mon, 04 May 2009 12:19 |
Goobers,
I will say it nicely.
In your eyes the SS was not proof. But server owners are NOT going to take a risk. You have to understand it from a server owner's perspective.
If they do what you are saying...that is, if they wait for FURTHER PROOF (like as if the SS was not enough proof already), then they stand a great risk of said player using cheats in one of their games ruining it for EVERYONE and also having a chance of escaping without getting caught.
It's like catching a well-armed suicide bomber before he even had a chance to blow himself up. Are you going to argue that there is NO PROOF he was going to blow himself up? Hey, what we are saying is, we caught a suicide bomber, he was wearing shitloads of bombs all over him and we are not going to release the fucker from our maximum security prison.
And what YOU are saying to get him released is: NO, he had the bombs all over his body BUT there was NO proof he was going to blow himself up. You gotta understand, Queen's screenshot EQUALS the suicide bomber's bombs. Server owners will not see it any other way; in other words, they are not going to agree to release the suicide bomber and WAIT for him to blow himself up. Once you see and understand this analogy, you will see why nobody is caring about what you say and why it is quite pointless of you to keep posting to get Queen unbanned from most servers.
And to make matters worse, Queen's constant story changing regarding the origins of the SS did not help AT ALL.
So, the server owners here have a more valid and legitimate cause to stick to their decisions than to listen to your argument.
|
To put it even more easier (@goobers and others) -> The more you discus this issue the more servers will ban him. Simply because of changing statements and this topic is kept alive.
[Updated on: Mon, 04 May 2009 11:26] Report message to a moderator |
|
|
|
| Re: [SKINS] SB Nod Apache [message #384316 is a reply to message #383677] |
Mon, 04 May 2009 22:04 |
Gohax
Messages: 738
Registered: January 2009
Karma: 0
|
Colonel |
|
|
Seriously wow. Seriously... Dude this is just plain ridiculous. He cheated on a lan game, he may have cheated in a pub game, oh well. We all know for a 100% fact he has *cheat name removed*on his computer. Shit, just 2 nights ago I was playing with Queen and not once did I suspect him of *cheat name removed*at all. We were gdi, he didn't know where the hell stanks were [someone with *cheat name removed*would either go exactly to them or sorta "edge" there way to them making it unnoticable].
This topic is about skins, not about him cheating. Now everyone, stfu and get back on topic. This is really ridiculous honestly..
He doesn't deserve a server ban from ever server owner that saw that ss. That's just plain ridiculous. I'm not backing him, nor am I bashing him, but if you have played with him you can tell he don't cheat.
Anyway, /end rant
Everyone else, /stfu too.
Nice skins btw.
 | Quote: |
·OTBot·Gohax killed beerfull4 (Black Hand Sniper/Sniper Rifle Vs. Deadeye/Sniper Rifle).
·OTBot·beerfull4: see that for sure a auto aim
·OTBot·beerfull4: u know how i can tell
·OTBot·Gohax: LOL
·OTBot·Gohax: how can you tell?
·OTBot·beerfull4: becuz your american and americans are like that
·OTBot·Gohax: LOL!
·OTBot·beerfull4 has left the game.
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: [SKINS] SB Nod Apache [message #384422 is a reply to message #383677] |
Tue, 05 May 2009 13:17 |
raven
Messages: 595
Registered: January 2007
Location: Toronto, Ontario
Karma: 0
|
Colonel |
|
|
Posting in epic thread.
Also, I was the person who banned Queen from our servers. I like how he can track targets through walls.. I've never met someone who can do that and they wern't cheating 
-Jelly Administrator
-Exodus Administrator
|
|
|
|
| Re: [SKINS] SB Nod Apache [message #384443 is a reply to message #383677] |
Tue, 05 May 2009 15:27 |
 |
Dover
Messages: 2547
Registered: March 2006
Location: Monterey, California
Karma: 0
|
General (2 Stars) |
|
|
First, let's get this out of the way: Queen's skins are ugly and garbage, and in no situation would I use them over vanilla Rengegade.
Secondly, because apparently some people still think "DELL" is another guy, when you start up a LAN game, the default name is the name of your computer (Mine is HOME1, or something equally retarded). Chances are, Queen is using a Dell computer and never bothered changing his name for that particular set of pictures.
So, that leaves us with what? A screenshot of Queen using *CHET NAEM REMOV* on LAN server. Harmless, right? He wasn't ruining anyone else's game. But it begs the question what *CHET NAEM REMOV* is doing on his hard drive to begin with. Did he download it just for that photo session, in an attempt to stir up drama? Probably not. Had he used it online? Probably. That's what it's designed for, and it's the only place it has any real use. Thus, through the power of logic, we can substantiate the claim that Queenhunter is a cheater faggot who should GTFO.
Also, his videos suck.
| DarkDemin wrote on Thu, 03 August 2006 19:19 |
Remember kids the internet is serious business.
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: [SKINS] SB Nod Apache [message #384460 is a reply to message #384443] |
Tue, 05 May 2009 18:29 |
 |
slosha
Messages: 1540
Registered: September 2008
Location: North Dakota FTW
Karma: 0
|
General (1 Star) |
|
|
| Dover wrote on Tue, 05 May 2009 17:27 |
First, let's get this out of the way: Queen's skins are ugly and garbage, and in no situation would I use them over vanilla Rengegade.
Secondly, because apparently some people still think "DELL" is another guy, when you start up a LAN game, the default name is the name of your computer (Mine is HOME1, or something equally retarded). Chances are, Queen is using a Dell computer and never bothered changing his name for that particular set of pictures.
So, that leaves us with what? A screenshot of Queen using *CHET NAEM REMOV* on LAN server. Harmless, right? He wasn't ruining anyone else's game. But it begs the question what *CHET NAEM REMOV* is doing on his hard drive to begin with. Did he download it just for that photo session, in an attempt to stir up drama? Probably not. Had he used it online? Probably. That's what it's designed for, and it's the only place it has any real use. Thus, through the power of logic, we can substantiate the claim that Queenhunter is a cheater faggot who should GTFO.
Also, his videos suck.
|
I always love your posts lol
The road I cruise is a bitch now, baby.
|
|
|
|
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Fri May 31 11:56:16 MST 2024
Total time taken to generate the page: 0.00886 seconds
|
Search
Help
Members
Register
Login
Home
