|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Should ACK be banned? [message #151518] |
Tue, 26 April 2005 06:53   |
genetix
Messages: 392
Registered: July 2003
Location: Saskatchewan Canada
Karma: 0
|
Commander |
|
|
| Renx |
Aircraftkiller replied here several times, and this is still on topic. Am I missing something?
|
He doesn't wanna get banned because I then he won't be able to stay here until these forums close. I remember ACK saying that the only reason he comes here is because he's been here since the forums opened and he wants to stay here until they close.
Why not make us all happy and NOT ban him but take away his "write" privlidges on all the forums. Then he can still come to the forums just not annoy the hell out of people. And if he really wanted to say something he could still pm 
Although I think crimson's already made up here mind.
Puzzle - Petals Around the Rose
|
|
|
|
| Should ACK be banned? [message #151527] |
Tue, 26 April 2005 09:54 |
 |
warranto
Messages: 2584
Registered: February 2003
Location: Alberta, Canada
Karma: 0
|
General (2 Stars) |
|
|
| msgtpain |
| warranto |
I fail to see how criminal acts relate to someone being annoying, but lets go with it. I also fail to see how the "hearing of words vs. seeing of words" compares to the "seeing of pornography", but I can state my opinion.
Tell you what, the next time Aircraftkiller posts pornography, I'll do what I would do with the person on the street. Put a stop to it. Whether that be reporting it to the police, removing the offensive post, or recommending a ban; as the situation demands.
|
I thought you were like a legal assistant in training or something, no? So enlighten me, why is it a criminal act? is it because a society has determined that there are specific guidelines and codes of conduct that they want enforced to keep the peace? Could that be in any way shape or form applied to someone that has no purpose in a community for any reason other than tormenting the other citizens?
|
hmm.. I must have missed this one.
Exactly, Society makes the rules to ensure it's citizens are prevented from harm and/or torment. So lets look at the rules of this society (the forum) shall we?
| Quote: |
You agree not to post any abusive, obscene, vulgar, slanderous, hateful, threatening, sexually-oriented or any other material that may violate any applicable laws. Doing so may lead to you being immediately and permanently banned (and your service provider being informed). The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions.
|
I fail to see the word "annoying" among those rules people have agreed to adhere to.
As for your latest responce:
Actually, the world I live in is anything but warm and fuzzy. Simply because I acknowledge when things are my fault, I realize that a fight needs two people to begin (one to entice, the other to follow through), and I realize that perhaps other people don't like to accept any sort of blame for anything they do.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Should ACK be banned? [message #151530] |
Tue, 26 April 2005 10:27 |
 |
Toolstyle
Messages: 215
Registered: May 2004
Location: Manchester
Karma: 0
|
Recruit |
|
|
| Quote: |
You agree not to post any abusive, obscene, vulgar, slanderous, hateful, threatening, sexually-oriented or any other material that may violate any applicable laws. Doing so may lead to you being immediately and permanently banned (and your service provider being informed). The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions.
|
True the rules don't say anything about annoying, however I've highlighted the rules he has broken...
| Aircraftkiller |
That's irrelevant to this thread.
Common fallacies of logic and rhetoric:
Ad hominem - attacking the arguer and not the argument.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Should ACK be banned? [message #151553] |
Tue, 26 April 2005 12:18 |
Spoony_old
Messages: 1105
Registered: December 2004
Karma: 0
|
General (1 Star) |
|
|
| Renx |
Aircraftkiller replied here several times, and this is still on topic. Am I missing something?
|
That's because it's a thread about Aircraftkiller...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Should ACK be banned? [message #151565] |
Tue, 26 April 2005 13:21 |
|
Toolstyle
Messages: 215
Registered: May 2004
Location: Manchester
Karma: 0
|
Recruit |
|
|
| warranto |
As have most other people.
So, unless you want complete censorship from me, find something else to verify your position.
|
I don't actually want him banned, he's funny in his idiocy, I just wanted to point out that fact.
| Aircraftkiller |
That's irrelevant to this thread.
Common fallacies of logic and rhetoric:
Ad hominem - attacking the arguer and not the argument.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Should ACK be banned? [message #151585] |
Tue, 26 April 2005 15:13 |
Naamloos
Messages: 771
Registered: April 2004
Location: The Netherlands
Karma: 0
|
Colonel |
|
|
Sometimes i wonder why and how ACK became such an asshole. If you look in some old topics you can see a big difference in the way he acts.
Tell us ACK, did you one day just woke up and thought, "Hey! Let's be an asshole!"?
Beter known as "raapnaap".
www.apathbeyond.com
|
|
|
|
| Should ACK be banned? [message #151598] |
Tue, 26 April 2005 15:32 |
 |
IRON FART
Messages: 1989
Registered: September 2003
Location: LOS ANGELES
Karma: 0
|
General (1 Star) |
|
|
| Quote: |
Lord knows he's made it his personal goal in life to annoy people on these forums. The problem is, if I banned him and told him not to post here anymore, then within a week there would be a topic and long discussion about banning deadfive, then spoony, and so on.
|
I don't see a problem with Spoony. As for deadfive, he pissed off some people at first, but that was completely unintentional, and he learned to have some respect for the forums by not making a million topics a day.
Unlike Spoony or deadfive, ACK is the only person who comes here to piss people off INTENTIONALLY. He only comes here to be a menace. If that isn't banworthy, then nothing is.
| Quote: |
Quote from IRC
<[Digital]> get man_fucking_a_car.mpg
<[Digital]> ah fuck wrong window
|
|
|
|
|
| Should ACK be banned? [message #151619] |
Tue, 26 April 2005 17:06 |
 |
Crimson
Messages: 7428
Registered: February 2003
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Karma: 0
|
General (5 Stars)
ADMINISTRATOR |
|
|
Technically, he's not the one who takes the threads off-topic. His correction of grammar/spelling/whatever, IS in fact related to the topic that was posted. The following post "Fuck you ACK don't correct people" is the post that takes it off-topic.
I'm the bawss.
|
|
|
|
| Should ACK be banned? [message #151622] |
Tue, 26 April 2005 17:28 |
EatMyCar
Messages: 90
Registered: January 2005
Karma: 0
|
Recruit |
|
|
|
Correcting things should not be considered a problem,i find it nice that somebody takes the liberty to correct errors. but what i dislike is when he posts random garbage. remember the skik(TEXTURE) thread i made? he posted a picture of a bear skin,see,that is pointless....and that is what he should be ignored for,not for corecting spelling....
|
|
|
|
| Should ACK be banned? [message #151623] |
Tue, 26 April 2005 17:32 |
|
IRON FART
Messages: 1989
Registered: September 2003
Location: LOS ANGELES
Karma: 0
|
General (1 Star) |
|
|
WOW This is really pathetic. A forum with no rules or authority. And to think you are blatantly defending someone who is an obvious troublemaker.
I'm not gonna waste more time with this thread.
| Quote: |
Quote from IRC
<[Digital]> get man_fucking_a_car.mpg
<[Digital]> ah fuck wrong window
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Should ACK be banned? [message #151926] |
Wed, 27 April 2005 21:16 |
 |
Lijitsu
Messages: 1575
Registered: April 2005
Location: Georgia, USA
Karma: 0
|
General (1 Star) |
|
|
Now, i know many of you would probly hate me for this, but, i like ACK. Hes brought us some very good maps, and, despite the fact that he doesnt play Renegade anymore, and he constantly puts it down (Only going on what other people have said, ive only been here for a very short time.), he shouldnt be banned. Like many people have said, just ignore him. I dont care if he tries to correct my grammar, im from the south, and this is how we talk down here, damnit! And, yes, its Nod, not NOD. Brotherhood of Nod, Global Defense Intiative/GDI. Nod doesnt stand for a damn thing, its just a faction. Like Clan Jade Falcon in Battletech, its just a faction. Also, Nod rules!
| Aircraftkiller wrote on Wed, 31 May 2006 22:30 |
I've been Nodbuggered. =( =( =(
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Search
Help
Members
Register
Login
Home
