Renegade Public Forums
C&C: Renegade --> Dying since 2003™, resurrected in 2024!
Home » General Discussions » General Discussion » how dangerous is a 'Win32.SillyDl.NM' virus?
how dangerous is a 'Win32.SillyDl.NM' virus? [message #216901] Sat, 02 September 2006 12:39 Go to next message
futura83
Messages: 1285
Registered: July 2006
Location: England
Karma: 0
General (1 Star)
Viva la Resistance!
ive just done a scan with Zone alarm, and the results show that i had one of these(had, as in the fact ZA deleted it Very Happy)

anyway, how dangerous is this virus to a pc, and what sorts of things does it do?


This is a signature. Reading this is wasting your time.
Re: how dangerous is a 'Win32.SillyDl.NM' virus? [message #216911 is a reply to message #216901] Sat, 02 September 2006 13:42 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Ma1kel is currently offline  Ma1kel
Messages: 956
Registered: July 2005
Location: Kingdom of the Netherland...
Karma: 0
Colonel
The question is, how dangerous is Win32?

Re: how dangerous is a 'Win32.SillyDl.NM' virus? [message #216933 is a reply to message #216901] Sat, 02 September 2006 16:03 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Dave Anderson is currently offline  Dave Anderson
Messages: 1953
Registered: December 2004
Location: United States
Karma: 0
General (1 Star)
Google my friend, Google.

David Anderson
Founder, Software Consultant
DCOM Productions
Microsoft Partner (MSP)
Re: how dangerous is a 'Win32.SillyDl.NM' virus? [message #216935 is a reply to message #216901] Sat, 02 September 2006 16:33 Go to previous messageGo to next message
z310
Messages: 2459
Registered: July 2003
Karma: 0
General (2 Stars)
Here's the information you need, mate.

[Updated on: Sat, 02 September 2006 16:33]

Report message to a moderator

Re: how dangerous is a 'Win32.SillyDl.NM' virus? [message #216937 is a reply to message #216901] Sat, 02 September 2006 17:02 Go to previous messageGo to next message
futura83
Messages: 1285
Registered: July 2006
Location: England
Karma: 0
General (1 Star)
Viva la Resistance!
why have you linked me to that? is that useful(!?)


no.

so if you dont have anything useful to say i suggest you STFU


This is a signature. Reading this is wasting your time.

[Updated on: Sat, 02 September 2006 17:05]

Report message to a moderator

Re: how dangerous is a 'Win32.SillyDl.NM' virus? [message #216938 is a reply to message #216901] Sat, 02 September 2006 17:15 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Kamuix is currently offline  Kamuix
Messages: 1247
Registered: May 2005
Location: Ontario, Canada
Karma: 0
General (1 Star)
In this case it would probably be a good idea though Rocked Over
Re: how dangerous is a 'Win32.SillyDl.NM' virus? [message #216942 is a reply to message #216937] Sat, 02 September 2006 17:45 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Dave Mason is currently offline  Dave Mason
Messages: 2357
Registered: April 2004
Location: Shropshire, England
Karma: 0
General (2 Stars)
the17doctor wrote on Sun, 03 September 2006 01:02

why have you linked me to that? is that useful(!?)


no.

so if you dont have anything useful to say i suggest you STFU


Did you google it or not?


www.myspace.com/midas
Re: how dangerous is a 'Win32.SillyDl.NM' virus? [message #216944 is a reply to message #216937] Sat, 02 September 2006 18:11 Go to previous messageGo to next message
cheesesoda is currently offline  cheesesoda
Messages: 6506
Registered: March 2003
Location: Jackson, Michigan
Karma: 0
General (5 Stars)

the17doctor wrote on Sat, 02 September 2006 20:02

why have you linked me to that? is that useful(!?)


no.

so if you dont have anything useful to say i suggest you STFU

Do you not understand the idea of USING A SEARCH ENGINE? I mean, seriously. Search for the fucking virus. There'll be plenty of sites with the definition of the virus including the risk that the virus has. IT'S NOT THAT FUCKING HARD.


Re: how dangerous is a 'Win32.SillyDl.NM' virus? [message #216945 is a reply to message #216944] Sat, 02 September 2006 18:16 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Dave Mason is currently offline  Dave Mason
Messages: 2357
Registered: April 2004
Location: Shropshire, England
Karma: 0
General (2 Stars)
j_ball430 wrote on Sun, 03 September 2006 02:11

the17doctor wrote on Sat, 02 September 2006 20:02

why have you linked me to that? is that useful(!?)


no.

so if you dont have anything useful to say i suggest you STFU

Do you not understand the idea of USING A SEARCH ENGINE? I mean, seriously. Search for the fucking virus. There'll be plenty of sites with the definition of the virus including the risk that the virus has. IT'S NOT THAT FUCKING HARD.


IS DAT UZFUL? NO SO GO AWAY PLZ!!!


www.myspace.com/midas
Re: how dangerous is a 'Win32.SillyDl.NM' virus? [message #216946 is a reply to message #216901] Sat, 02 September 2006 18:19 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Kamuix is currently offline  Kamuix
Messages: 1247
Registered: May 2005
Location: Ontario, Canada
Karma: 0
General (1 Star)
Harsh!
Re: how dangerous is a 'Win32.SillyDl.NM' virus? [message #216947 is a reply to message #216901] Sat, 02 September 2006 18:21 Go to previous messageGo to next message
cheesesoda is currently offline  cheesesoda
Messages: 6506
Registered: March 2003
Location: Jackson, Michigan
Karma: 0
General (5 Stars)

It's amazing what searching the site of the program that removes the virus does! Of course, that's too difficult. Also, I refuse to paste the link of the virus definition that I found because this idiot can learn to do it on his own.

http://ivic.zonelabs.com/tmpl/body/CA/virusDetails.jsp?VId=x xxxx


Re: how dangerous is a 'Win32.SillyDl.NM' virus? [message #216948 is a reply to message #216901] Sat, 02 September 2006 18:24 Go to previous messageGo to next message
jnz is currently offline  jnz
Messages: 3396
Registered: July 2006
Location: 30th century
Karma: 0
General (3 Stars)
i know the17doctor and chances are he has google it.

AND GUESS WHAT i googled it to find nothing!

so stop being a fucking troll.



i get this virus all the time, i think it is a downloader so the quicker you get it off your computer the less viruses you will have afterwards.

lol i left it one once and windows wouldn't even boot! not even into safe mode.
Re: how dangerous is a 'Win32.SillyDl.NM' virus? [message #216952 is a reply to message #216901] Sat, 02 September 2006 18:29 Go to previous messageGo to next message
xptek is currently offline  xptek
Messages: 1410
Registered: August 2004
Location: USSA
Karma: 0
General (1 Star)
Do you not know how to use Google?

For.
The.
Google.
Impaired.
Fucktards.


cause = time

[Updated on: Sat, 02 September 2006 18:30]

Report message to a moderator

Re: how dangerous is a 'Win32.SillyDl.NM' virus? [message #216953 is a reply to message #216901] Sat, 02 September 2006 18:31 Go to previous messageGo to next message
jnz is currently offline  jnz
Messages: 3396
Registered: July 2006
Location: 30th century
Karma: 0
General (3 Stars)
i put in what i know andy would of put in.
Re: how dangerous is a 'Win32.SillyDl.NM' virus? [message #216954 is a reply to message #216901] Sat, 02 September 2006 18:32 Go to previous messageGo to next message
xptek is currently offline  xptek
Messages: 1410
Registered: August 2004
Location: USSA
Karma: 0
General (1 Star)
That's why stupid people shouldn't use the Internet.

cause = time
Re: how dangerous is a 'Win32.SillyDl.NM' virus? [message #216956 is a reply to message #216901] Sat, 02 September 2006 18:33 Go to previous messageGo to next message
jnz is currently offline  jnz
Messages: 3396
Registered: July 2006
Location: 30th century
Karma: 0
General (3 Stars)
andy is not stupid, he just doen't think as logicly as we do.

you dont even know andy so why call him stupid?
Re: how dangerous is a 'Win32.SillyDl.NM' virus? [message #216958 is a reply to message #216901] Sat, 02 September 2006 18:38 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Dave Mason is currently offline  Dave Mason
Messages: 2357
Registered: April 2004
Location: Shropshire, England
Karma: 0
General (2 Stars)
Because he's stupid.

www.myspace.com/midas
Re: how dangerous is a 'Win32.SillyDl.NM' virus? [message #216959 is a reply to message #216956] Sat, 02 September 2006 18:42 Go to previous messageGo to next message
cheesesoda is currently offline  cheesesoda
Messages: 6506
Registered: March 2003
Location: Jackson, Michigan
Karma: 0
General (5 Stars)

help-linux wrote on Sat, 02 September 2006 21:33

andy is not stupid, he just doen't think as logicly as we do.

you dont even know andy so why call him stupid?

You just said that you couldn't find it. How do you then equate yourself to being able to think logically? YOU COULDN'T FIND IT EITHER.


Re: how dangerous is a 'Win32.SillyDl.NM' virus? [message #216960 is a reply to message #216954] Sat, 02 September 2006 18:43 Go to previous messageGo to next message
IronWarrior is currently offline  IronWarrior
Messages: 2460
Registered: November 2004
Location: England UK
Karma: 0
General (2 Stars)
xptek wrote on Sat, 02 September 2006 21:32

That's why stupid people shouldn't use the Internet.



LOL
Re: how dangerous is a 'Win32.SillyDl.NM' virus? [message #216962 is a reply to message #216956] Sat, 02 September 2006 19:05 Go to previous messageGo to next message
z310
Messages: 2459
Registered: July 2003
Karma: 0
General (2 Stars)
help-linux wrote on Sat, 02 September 2006 21:33

you dont even know andy so why call him stupid?


Because, Daniel, the stupid question he asked warranted it.
Re: how dangerous is a 'Win32.SillyDl.NM' virus? [message #217002 is a reply to message #216901] Sat, 02 September 2006 23:49 Go to previous messageGo to next message
light is currently offline  light
Messages: 988
Registered: January 2005
Karma: 0
Colonel
Threat Assessment
Overall Risk: Very Low
Wild: Low
Destructiveness: Medium
Pervasiveness: None
http://www3.ca.com/securityadvisor/virusinfo/virus.aspx?ID=5 2637

Now can we please stop flaming?


http://www.azupload.com/displayImage.php/setid2745.png
Re: how dangerous is a 'Win32.SillyDl.NM' virus? [message #217009 is a reply to message #216901] Sun, 03 September 2006 02:47 Go to previous messageGo to next message
futura83
Messages: 1285
Registered: July 2006
Location: England
Karma: 0
General (1 Star)
Viva la Resistance!
do you guys even ask anything? no you dont. i didnt google it but i did go straight to an info page zone alarm gave me.

all i wanted to do is ask a second opinion and i get a load of retards flaming me!?


This is a signature. Reading this is wasting your time.
Re: how dangerous is a 'Win32.SillyDl.NM' virus? [message #217011 is a reply to message #216901] Sun, 03 September 2006 02:58 Go to previous messageGo to next message
light is currently offline  light
Messages: 988
Registered: January 2005
Karma: 0
Colonel
You're welcome...

But if you ask a basic question without trying to find the answer yourself this is the type of response you get.

Doesn't mean it's the best response, but that's the internet for you.


http://www.azupload.com/displayImage.php/setid2745.png
Re: how dangerous is a 'Win32.SillyDl.NM' virus? [message #217012 is a reply to message #216901] Sun, 03 September 2006 03:00 Go to previous messageGo to next message
futura83
Messages: 1285
Registered: July 2006
Location: England
Karma: 0
General (1 Star)
Viva la Resistance!
they didnt have to call me stupid though did they, as they dont even know me.

oh, and thanks light for being useful.


This is a signature. Reading this is wasting your time.

[Updated on: Sun, 03 September 2006 03:03]

Report message to a moderator

Re: how dangerous is a 'Win32.SillyDl.NM' virus? [message #217013 is a reply to message #216901] Sun, 03 September 2006 03:02 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
futura83
Messages: 1285
Registered: July 2006
Location: England
Karma: 0
General (1 Star)
Viva la Resistance!
edit: sorry about the double post; my browser was going slow Blush

This is a signature. Reading this is wasting your time.

[Updated on: Sun, 03 September 2006 03:03]

Report message to a moderator

Previous Topic: C&C 3 Making a come back?
Next Topic: SW Mod Released!
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Thu May 23 08:08:09 MST 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 1.18760 seconds