Home » General Discussions » Heated Discussions and Debates » HIJACK
| Re: HIJACK [message #171602 is a reply to message #171371] |
Thu, 15 September 2005 15:22   |
|
|
Oh my God, you idiots don't stop, do you? You have absolutely no clue what the fuck "E-Terrorists" was created for, but because you're too fucking stupid to try and figure out and use some reasoning, you flame it and have even gone as far as to make signatures AND a mock logo for the "E-Terrorists" in a poor attempt to get your digs in. Jesus Christ, kids, grow the fuck up already.
Libertarian Party | The King's Throne | The Soda Shop
|
|
|
|
| Re: HIJACK [message #171603 is a reply to message #171371] |
Thu, 15 September 2005 15:23 |
 |
Dave Mason
Messages: 2357
Registered: April 2004
Location: Shropshire, England
Karma: 0
|
General (2 Stars) |
|
|
| Ma1kel wrote on Thu, 15 September 2005 18:41 |
Go Oblivion!
|
| DJM wrote on Thu, 15 September 2005 18:51 |
Do you ever post anything more than 1 sentence?
|
Oblivion:
| Quote: |
You Sir, are an idiot
|
www.myspace.com/midas
|
|
|
|
| Re: HIJACK [message #171606 is a reply to message #171371] |
Thu, 15 September 2005 15:30 |
|
|
Dave, they're children and their obsession with the "E-Terrorists" is quite pathetic. They're calling us stupid, immature, and pathetic, yet they're taking time out of their days to create signatures and continue to flame our "group". If they're going to tell us to grow up, then they might want to first.
Libertarian Party | The King's Throne | The Soda Shop
|
|
|
|
| Re: HIJACK [message #171607 is a reply to message #171593] |
Thu, 15 September 2005 15:45 |
 |
Jecht
Messages: 3156
Registered: September 2004
Karma: 0
|
General (3 Stars) |
|
|
| Oblivion165 wrote on Thu, 15 September 2005 15:25 |
| gbull wrote on Thu, 15 September 2005 15:47 |
| Oblivion165 wrote on Thu, 15 September 2005 14:25 |
| gbull wrote on Thu, 15 September 2005 14:51 |
I am skeptical of that.
|
Well usually someone who's name reflects a bull's orgasm would.
So i dont blame you for that.
|
Because ghuman is a human orgasm right? Your insult sucks, and has nothing to do with what I said at all. I don't know what makes you this stupid, but at least you know its working.
|
who the fuck said ghuman. Wha? Wha? thats right, no one. We're talking "G" spots, and feeling the g's. Maybe you should think about that while your out there raping those bulls.
|
Im going to type this clearly and as dumbed down as possible so that even you can understand it. You(oblivion or "oblivious"<--I can mock names too) are stating that the name gbull(Me) is somehow correlated with the orgasm of a bull. However, calling the g-spot of a bull "gbull" would be the same as calling the g-spot of a human "ghuman". I would also like to point out that your thinking about people raping bulls. You might want to see a phsyciatrist you sicko.
|
|
|
|
| Re: HIJACK [message #171609 is a reply to message #171371] |
Thu, 15 September 2005 15:56 |
|
Dave Mason
Messages: 2357
Registered: April 2004
Location: Shropshire, England
Karma: 0
|
General (2 Stars) |
|
|
meh, I'm not getting worked up by this. I just think it's funny.
I wouldn't be suprised if Nopic comes in this topic any second and asks for pm access.
But anyway. I also find it quite ammusing how he can tell us to grow up when posting ridiculously inane "insults" such as "go rape a bull".
www.myspace.com/midas
[Updated on: Thu, 15 September 2005 15:57] Report message to a moderator |
|
|
|
| Re: HIJACK [message #171611 is a reply to message #171607] |
Thu, 15 September 2005 16:14 |
 |
Lijitsu
Messages: 1575
Registered: April 2005
Location: Georgia, USA
Karma: 0
|
General (1 Star) |
|
|
| gbull wrote on Thu, 15 September 2005 18:45 |
| Oblivion165 wrote on Thu, 15 September 2005 15:25 |
| gbull wrote on Thu, 15 September 2005 15:47 |
| Oblivion165 wrote on Thu, 15 September 2005 14:25 |
| gbull wrote on Thu, 15 September 2005 14:51 |
I am skeptical of that.
|
Well usually someone who's name reflects a bull's orgasm would.
So i dont blame you for that.
|
Because ghuman is a human orgasm right? Your insult sucks, and has nothing to do with what I said at all. I don't know what makes you this stupid, but at least you know its working.
|
who the fuck said ghuman. Wha? Wha? thats right, no one. We're talking "G" spots, and feeling the g's. Maybe you should think about that while your out there raping those bulls.
|
Im going to type this clearly and as dumbed down as possible so that even you can understand it. You(oblivion or "oblivious"<--I can mock names too) are stating that the name gbull(Me) is somehow correlated with the orgasm of a bull. However, calling the g-spot of a bull "gbull" would be the same as calling the g-spot of a human "ghuman". I would also like to point out that your thinking about people raping bulls. You might want to see a phsyciatrist you sicko.
|
Gbull, the real play on names here, would be to change Oblivion's numbers in his name into "1337" letters, like so: Oblivion165. We all know the letters in Oblivion, since they are in the English language, as is said word "Oblivion" however, not everyone knows the "1337" language, compiled of nothing but numbers. If we considered Oblivion a "1337157" or "Leetist" then his name would instead be "Oblivionigs" which would be translated from slang to "Oblivion Ni***rs". Now, since we have discovered this, we can now officially mark the Oblivion Ni***r as a Leetist, thereby lowering his IQ dramatically, down to an astonishing 4.2. Since this IQ is not possible, because there is a percentage in it, it is immediately lowered by half, and the percentage making it a very low number of: 2. Thus, we have just called the Oblivion Ni***r an idiot.
| Aircraftkiller wrote on Wed, 31 May 2006 22:30 |
I've been Nodbuggered. =( =( =(
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: HIJACK [message #171612 is a reply to message #171602] |
Thu, 15 September 2005 16:26 |
bisen11
Messages: 797
Registered: December 2004
Karma: 0
|
Colonel |
|
|
| j_ball430 wrote on Thu, 15 September 2005 18:22 |
Oh my God, you idiots don't stop, do you? You have absolutely no clue what the fuck "E-Terrorists" was created for, but because you're too fucking stupid to try and figure out and use some reasoning, you flame it and have even gone as far as to make signatures AND a mock logo for the "E-Terrorists" in a poor attempt to get your digs in. Jesus Christ, kids, grow the fuck up already.
|
Since when does throwing a rug on the dirty floor qualify as cleaning it?
|
|
|
|
| Re: HIJACK [message #171613 is a reply to message #171611] |
Thu, 15 September 2005 16:27 |
 |
Oblivion165
Messages: 3468
Registered: June 2003
Location: Hendersonville, North Car...
Karma: 0
|
General (3 Stars) |
|
|
| Lijitsu wrote on Thu, 15 September 2005 19:14 |
| gbull wrote on Thu, 15 September 2005 18:45 |
| Oblivion165 wrote on Thu, 15 September 2005 15:25 |
| gbull wrote on Thu, 15 September 2005 15:47 |
| Oblivion165 wrote on Thu, 15 September 2005 14:25 |
| gbull wrote on Thu, 15 September 2005 14:51 |
I am skeptical of that.
|
Well usually someone who's name reflects a bull's orgasm would.
So i dont blame you for that.
|
Because ghuman is a human orgasm right? Your insult sucks, and has nothing to do with what I said at all. I don't know what makes you this stupid, but at least you know its working.
|
who the fuck said ghuman. Wha? Wha? thats right, no one. We're talking "G" spots, and feeling the g's. Maybe you should think about that while your out there raping those bulls.
|
Im going to type this clearly and as dumbed down as possible so that even you can understand it. You(oblivion or "oblivious"<--I can mock names too) are stating that the name gbull(Me) is somehow correlated with the orgasm of a bull. However, calling the g-spot of a bull "gbull" would be the same as calling the g-spot of a human "ghuman". I would also like to point out that your thinking about people raping bulls. You might want to see a phsyciatrist you sicko.
|
Gbull, the real play on names here, would be to change Oblivion's numbers in his name into "1337" letters, like so: Oblivion165. We all know the letters in Oblivion, since they are in the English language, as is said word "Oblivion" however, not everyone knows the "1337" language, compiled of nothing but numbers. If we considered Oblivion a "1337157" or "Leetist" then his name would instead be "Oblivionigs" which would be translated from slang to "Oblivion Ni***rs". Now, since we have discovered this, we can now officially mark the Oblivion Ni***r as a Leetist, thereby lowering his IQ dramatically, down to an astonishing 4.2. Since this IQ is not possible, because there is a percentage in it, it is immediately lowered by half, and the percentage making it a very low number of: 2. Thus, we have just called the Oblivion Ni***r an idiot.
|
Wow, ebonics. Do you know klingon as well? 165 has nothing to do with leet speak or any other form of lower-class communication.
All things being done, we all have been here ALONG time. We generally agree on most things, some we dont. I think its best that we just say "I agree" "I disagree"
We are putting on a bad show for the newer members.
WOL: Ob165ion Skype: Oblivion165 Yahoo Instant Messenger: CaptainJohn165
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: HIJACK [message #171624 is a reply to message #171371] |
Thu, 15 September 2005 18:09 |
CPUKiller
Messages: 17
Registered: June 2005
Karma: 0
|
Recruit |
|
|
I know the "real" purpose of E-Terrorists:
1. To annoy people who post something by completely redirecting the thread from their intended topic. If you want a thread about penguins, just make one.
2. To act like a bunch of elitest who want only their ideas expressed and to repress all others.
3. To generally act like 12 year olds who think they know everything but don't.
RyuKishen: Your "idle threats" I refer to are in another thread where you were bothering ben for putting an E-Terrorist logo in his sig. If you think you are all bad or know some great hackers (or whatever else you were talking about), I invite you to try them on me, they won't get far. And hopefully, you won't resort to script kiddie DDoS junk either, as I can change my IP at will.
[Updated on: Thu, 15 September 2005 18:14] Report message to a moderator |
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: HIJACK [message #171626 is a reply to message #171371] |
Thu, 15 September 2005 18:17 |
 |
RyuKishen
Messages: 87
Registered: July 2005
Karma: 0
|
Recruit |
|
|
What we do is we take totally pointless and annoying topics, and we make them into something entertaining until it gets locked. We gladly let people express their ideas. It's just when people post stuff that is pointless or offensive, we decide that we want to take the focus off of that topic. When we take offensive topics off-topic, we actually save them from the amount of flames that they would receive.
About my "idle threat" to ben, it wasn't about getting any hackers or anything. It was about filing a law suit against him for using copyrighted material without the consent of the owner. And that is VERY possible. Besides, he took the picture out of his signature before we had to do anything about it 
Chaos is the cure for the plague known as mankind ...
[Updated on: Thu, 15 September 2005 18:19] Report message to a moderator |
|
|
|
| Re: HIJACK [message #171628 is a reply to message #171625] |
Thu, 15 September 2005 18:25 |
CPUKiller
Messages: 17
Registered: June 2005
Karma: 0
|
Recruit |
|
|
| j_ball430 wrote on Thu, 15 September 2005 21:16 |
1. Redirecting pointless threads from their intended subjects. If nopic didn't insult Hurricane Katrina victims, it wouldn't have been turned into a thread about penguins.
Hmm... seems like repression of his opinions for yours to me. He had a thread about Katrina, you didn't like it, so you wanted to change it to something that fell into your own ideals.
2. We're only repressing the spammy threads. Hell, I even defended nopic's 9/11 thread, so we're not out to get any specific people. Care to try again?
"Spammy" threads are up to the mods, they can lock them if they want. No need to waste time and cause confusion by having a thread with one title but about something completely different.
3. I seem to have a much better grasp on reality than you do, and if that seems arrogant, then so be it. I don't need your approval to feel worthy.
Yeah, I'm the arrogant one.
The threats were hot air. I knew ben would relinquish the image from his signature if I had enough of a convincing threat.  It appeared to be a threat, but it was more of a manipulation.
Whether manipulation or not, it was still an idle threat.
|
Suing someone over an E-Terrorist logo is unrealistic, even while technically possible. Nobody would pay the amount it would take to prosecute such a case, let alone finding a lawyer who would do it without charging you an arm and a leg for handling such a frivolous case.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: HIJACK [message #171634 is a reply to message #171371] |
Thu, 15 September 2005 18:34 |
|
|
Are you trying to argue with me that I should have left nopic's thread alone because he, in his own twisted little way, thought it was fine? Okay, so maybe we should leave theives and murderers alone to do their buisness. I mean, afterall, they don't see it as being wrong, so how dare we inflict our opinions on them? Shame shame.
Sure, we could let the mods do their jobs, but you haven't been here long enough to realize that unless topics are expanded at great lengths, the thread usually stays open no matter how ridiculous it may become. Sure, there are exceptions, but not that many.
I'm the arrogant one because I don't need your approval? Sure...
Libertarian Party | The King's Throne | The Soda Shop
[Updated on: Thu, 15 September 2005 18:35] Report message to a moderator |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: HIJACK [message #171637 is a reply to message #171371] |
Thu, 15 September 2005 18:41 |
|
Jecht
Messages: 3156
Registered: September 2004
Karma: 0
|
General (3 Stars) |
|
|
| CPUKiller wrote on Thu, 15 September 2005 20:37 |
| gbull wrote on Thu, 15 September 2005 21:29 |
Why do you have me talking about Star Trek in your sig when I hate the show and the idea of it all together? Please, at least base your hatred of us on fact rather than assuption if you must have someone to hate.
|
If you hate ST so much, why do you have an E-Terrorist Red Alert?
Tommorrow will I see you at Yellow Alert or Green Alert? (And in case there are any nerds out there, yes there is a Green Alert, it is normal ship operating status)
|
I was making reference to the real Terrorist alert level you damn idiot. Where have you been the last 5 years.
[Updated on: Thu, 15 September 2005 18:42] Report message to a moderator |
|
|
|
| Re: HIJACK [message #171638 is a reply to message #171634] |
Thu, 15 September 2005 18:43 |
CPUKiller
Messages: 17
Registered: June 2005
Karma: 0
|
Recruit |
|
|
| j_ball430 wrote on Thu, 15 September 2005 21:34 |
Are you trying to argue with me that I should have left nopic's thread alone because he, in his own twisted little way, thought it was fine? Okay, so maybe we should leave theives and murderers alone to do their buisness. I mean, afterall, they don't see it as being wrong, so how dare we inflict our opinions on them? Shame shame.
It is fine for nopic to post things that are fine in his twisted way, he's not hurting anyone. If you are so sensitive that posts on a message board offend you, you shouldn't be on the internet. These rules don't apply to thieves and murderers because those things actually hurt someone/something. Words do not, so you and anyone else shouldn't worry about it.
Sure, we could let the mods do their jobs, but you haven't been here long enough to realize that unless topics are expanded at great lengths, the thread usually stays open no matter how ridiculous it may become. Sure, there are exceptions, but not that many.
Whether the mods choose to close them or not, that is their option and their decision. It's not up to you and the other E-Terrorists to take it upon themselves, embarrassing everyone involved.
I'm the arrogant one because I don't need your approval? Sure...
Anyone who thinks that they should be in charge of censoring other people's posts because they want to judge everyone and everything by their own morals is just being ethnocentric, which is being arrogrant. I however, try to let people do what they do, as long as they don't try to get all judgemental on someone else because they think they are the moral right.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Thu May 23 06:13:40 MST 2024
Total time taken to generate the page: 2.26388 seconds
|
Search
Help
Members
Register
Login
Home
