Renegade Public Forums
C&C: Renegade --> Dying since 2003™, resurrected in 2024!
Home » General Discussions » General Discussion » Foobar2000
Foobar2000 [message #157721] Tue, 31 May 2005 13:58 Go to next message
Doitle is currently offline  Doitle
Messages: 1723
Registered: February 2003
Location: Chicago, IL
Karma: 0
General (1 Star)
Moderator/Captain

This is a media player that Aurora showed me. I was wondering if any of you used it or knew anything about it. I'm looking for good "components" to mod it out with. It seems really expandable. If you don't know what it is maybe check into it here: http://www.foobar2000.com It's kinda a replacement for Winamp. It uses less processor time so I figure it might be good for me to listen to my tuneskis during Source or World of Warcraft.

http://www.n00bstories.com/image.fetch.php?id=1285726594
Foobar2000 [message #157827] Tue, 31 May 2005 23:28 Go to previous messageGo to next message
YSLMuffins is currently offline  YSLMuffins
Messages: 1144
Registered: February 2003
Location: Moved a long time ago (it...
Karma: 0
General (1 Star)
Moderator - Mod Forum
I use it. It's great. :thumbsup:

-YSLMuffins
The goddess of all (bread products)
See me online as yslcheeze
Foobar2000 [message #157831] Wed, 01 June 2005 00:03 Go to previous messageGo to next message
icedog90 is currently offline  icedog90
Messages: 3483
Registered: April 2003
Karma: 0
General (3 Stars)
It uses 6mb of memory when Winamp uses 7mb. The difference is extremely small, so I'm sticking with Winamp. It doesn't even matter anyways since I have 1gb of memory.
Foobar2000 [message #157832] Wed, 01 June 2005 00:14 Go to previous messageGo to next message
xptek is currently offline  xptek
Messages: 1410
Registered: August 2004
Location: USSA
Karma: 0
General (1 Star)
I'll stick with Winamp. It has all the lovely little plugins.

cause = time
Foobar2000 [message #157847] Wed, 01 June 2005 05:15 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Doitle is currently offline  Doitle
Messages: 1723
Registered: February 2003
Location: Chicago, IL
Karma: 0
General (1 Star)
Moderator/Captain

Foobar has a rediculous amount of plugins too but, they are kinda complicated. There's also a bridge so any winamp plugin works in Foobar2000.

http://www.n00bstories.com/image.fetch.php?id=1285726594
Foobar2000 [message #157850] Wed, 01 June 2005 05:23 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Doitle is currently offline  Doitle
Messages: 1723
Registered: February 2003
Location: Chicago, IL
Karma: 0
General (1 Star)
Moderator/Captain

Actually with big lists of songs Foobar is way more efficient. I put in about a thousand songs in Foobar2000 and had a memory usage of 10-12K, then I put 500 songs in Winamp and had a usage of 17-20K.

http://www.n00bstories.com/image.fetch.php?id=1285373010


http://www.n00bstories.com/image.fetch.php?id=1285726594
Foobar2000 [message #157858] Wed, 01 June 2005 07:45 Go to previous messageGo to next message
cheesesoda is currently offline  cheesesoda
Messages: 6506
Registered: March 2003
Location: Jackson, Michigan
Karma: 0
General (5 Stars)

Yeah, I'll stick with WinAmp -- 1200 songs, 8-9MB of RAM.

Foobar2000 [message #157869] Wed, 01 June 2005 14:23 Go to previous messageGo to next message
icedog90 is currently offline  icedog90
Messages: 3483
Registered: April 2003
Karma: 0
General (3 Stars)
Like I said, it doesn't even matter with the amount of memory I have.
Re: Foobar2000 [message #158051 is a reply to message #157721] Thu, 02 June 2005 07:38 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Dan
Messages: 395
Registered: August 2003
Location: UK
Karma: 0
Commander
Windows Media Player for the win!

I dont know why, but I prefer it over the rest!
Re: Foobar2000 [message #158087 is a reply to message #157721] Thu, 02 June 2005 09:38 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Dave Mason is currently offline  Dave Mason
Messages: 2357
Registered: April 2004
Location: Shropshire, England
Karma: 0
General (2 Stars)
Media Player uses as much RAM as foobar and winamp put together.

still, I have no room left on my harddrive for programs I don't need so sorry winamp, foobar. I'll stick with media player.


www.myspace.com/midas
Re: Foobar2000 [message #158305 is a reply to message #157721] Fri, 03 June 2005 14:26 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Renx is currently offline  Renx
Messages: 2321
Registered: April 2003
Location: Canada
Karma: 0
General (2 Stars)
Category Moderator
Then again WMP has more features.

~Canucck

http://www.sloganizer.net/en/style7,Espion.png

Blazer

...RG made me ugly
Re: Foobar2000 [message #158318 is a reply to message #157721] Fri, 03 June 2005 15:23 Go to previous messageGo to next message
flyingfox is currently offline  flyingfox
Messages: 1612
Registered: February 2003
Location: scotland, uk
Karma: 0
General (1 Star)
How much does realone player use?
Re: Foobar2000 [message #158328 is a reply to message #157721] Fri, 03 June 2005 17:12 Go to previous messageGo to next message
icedog90 is currently offline  icedog90
Messages: 3483
Registered: April 2003
Karma: 0
General (3 Stars)
RealOne sucks, so does RealPlayer. I'm going to reformat, install Linux, and use it full-time. I'll be using either the Linux version of Winamp here: http://software.deviantart.com/details/225/ or XMMS.

[Updated on: Fri, 03 June 2005 17:12]

Report message to a moderator

Re: Foobar2000 [message #158329 is a reply to message #157721] Fri, 03 June 2005 17:23 Go to previous message
Doitle is currently offline  Doitle
Messages: 1723
Registered: February 2003
Location: Chicago, IL
Karma: 0
General (1 Star)
Moderator/Captain

Foobar 2000 has infinate features. But they are a tad complicated. It's designed with an open component implimentation so you can make plugins for it that do whatever.

http://www.n00bstories.com/image.fetch.php?id=1285726594
Previous Topic: The Top of the Hand Of Nod
Next Topic: Command & Conquer Renegade (Reborn)
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Thu May 23 05:09:08 MST 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 3.36344 seconds